The construction of transnational and national systems for comparing qualities of universities are presented and discussed. In focus are two important university ranking lists — those produced by the Shanghai Jiao Tong University and by the Times Higher Education Supplement. A Swedish example concerning the making of a resource distribution system based on performance indicators is presented. The Swedish performance indicator system and the international university ranking lists contain similar technologies for comparing universities and are to a large extent based on services of the same multinational corporations. From this point of view ranking lists and systems of performance based governance can be conceived of as globalisation at work.
ArchambaultE.Vignola-GagnéE.CôtéG.LarivièreV. & GingrasY. (2005) Welcome to the Linguistic Warp Zone, in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Stockholm, Sweden, July 24–28, 2005, 149–158.
4.
BollenJ.van de SompelH.SmithJ.A. & LuceR. (2005) Toward Alternative Metrics of Journal Impact: A comparison of download and citation data, Information Processing and Management, 41(6), 1419–1440. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.ipm.2005.03.024
5.
BourdieuP. (1988) Homo Academicus. Oxford: Polity Press.
6.
CavallinM. & LindbladS. (2006) Världsmästerskap i vetenskap? En granskning av internationella rankinglistor och deras sätt att hantera kvaliteter hos universitetet. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg Dnr G11 530/06.
LyotardJ.-F. (1979) The Postmodern Condition. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
12.
MarginsonS. (2006) National and Global Competition in Education, in LauderH.BrownP.DillaboughJ.-A. & HalseyA.H. (Eds) Education, Globalization and Social Change, 893–908. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
MarginsonS. & van der WendeM.C. (2007) To Rank or To Be Ranked: The impact of global rankings in higher education, Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3/4), 306–329. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/1028315307303544
14.
MoedH.F. (2005) Statistical Relationships between Downloads and Citations at the Level of Individual Documents within a Single Journal, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(10), 1088–1097. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1002/asi.20200
15.
NowotnyH.GibbonsM. & ScottP. (2001) Rethinking Science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
16.
OppenheimC. (1997) The Correlation between Citation Counts and the 1992 Research Assessment Exercise Ratings for British Research in Genetics, Anatomy and Archaeology, Journal of Documentation, 53(5), 477–487. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1108/EUM0000000007207
RamirezF. (2006) The Rationalization of Universities, in DjelicM.-L. & Shalin-AnderssonK. (Eds) Transnational Governance: Institutional dynamics of regulation, 224–245. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
RothblattS. & WittrockB. (Eds) (1993) The European and American University since 1800: Historical and sociological essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
SOU/State Commission (2007) Resurser för kvalitet, p. 81. SOU.
22.
Steiner-KhamsiG. (2004) Blazing a Trail for Policy Theory and Practice, in Steiner-KhamsiG. (Ed.) The Global Politics of Educational Borrowing and Lending, 201–220. New York: Teachers College Press.
Universitetsläraren 2007 nr 18: Kvalitet och aktivitet föreslås ges pengar.
25.
UsherA. & SavinoM. (2007) A Global Survey of Rankings and League Tables, in SanoffA.P.UsherA.SavinoM. & ClarkeM., College and University Ranking Systems: Global perspectives and American challenges, 23–34. Final Report. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.
