The National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) in Germany: An Overview of Design,Research Options and Access,with a Focus on Lower-Secondary School

Abstract

This article introduces the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS). This German longitudinal study produces a vast amount of data for the scientific community, and researchers all around Europe are invited to use the data to address various research questions empirically. Therefore, the authors provide information about the purpose as well as the design of this educational study that has just released data from several starting cohorts, ranging from newborns to adults. As the authors have coordinated the starting cohort of students in lower-secondary school, this target group will be introduced in more detail, with the implementation of NEPS's design being outlined, as well as the tests and survey contents. The analytical potentials are exemplified by the authors' stage-specific research on German-language instruction, the development of orthography competence, and engagement in reading and orthography in lower-secondary school. An overview of different modes of access to the available data completes this research report.

References

Blossfeld

H.-P.

Schneider

& Doll

(2009) Methodological Advantages of Panel Studies: Designing the new National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) in Germany, Journal for Educational Research Online, 1(1), 10–32.

Blossfeld

H.-P.

& von Maurice

(2011) Education as a Lifelong Process, in Blossfeld

H.-P.

Roßbach

H.-G.

& von Maurice

(Eds) Education as a Lifelong Process. The German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS), pp. 19–34. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Blossfeld

H.-P.

von Maurice

& Schneider

(2011) The National Educational Panel Study: Need, main features, and research potential, in Blossfeld

H.-P.

Roßbach

H.-G.

& von Maurice

(Eds) Education as a Lifelong Process. The German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS), pp. 5–18. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Boekaerts

(1997) Self-regulated Learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policymakers, educators, teachers, and students, Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 161–186. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00015-1

Bolhuis

(2003) Towards Process-oriented Teaching for Self-directed Lifelong Learning: A multidimensional perspective, Learning and Instruction, 13(3), 327–347. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00008-7

Campbell

J.R.

Voelkl

K.E.

& Donahue

P.L.

(1997) NAEP 1996 Trends in Academic Progress. NCES Publication No. 97–985r. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.

Clausen

(2002) Unterrichtsqualität: Eine Frage der Perspektive? Empirische Analysen zur Übereinstimmung, Konstrukt- und Kriteriumsvalidität [Lesson Quality: A question of perspective? Empirical Analyses on Congruence, Validity of Constructs and Criteria]. Münster: Waxmann.

Eccles

& Wang

M.-T.

(2012) So What is Student Engagement Anyway? In Christenson

S.L.

Reschly

A.L.

& Wylie

(Eds) Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, pp. 133–145. New York: Springer.

Ehmke

& Jude

(2010) Soziale Herkunft und Kompetenzerwerb [Social Origin and Competence Acquisition], in Klieme

Artelt

Hartig

Jude

Köller

Prenzel

Schneider

& Stanat

(Eds) PISA 2009. Bilanz nach einem Jahrzehnt [PISA 2009. Conclusions After One Decade], pp. 231–254. Münster: Waxmann.

10.

Eisenberg

(2006) Das Wort [The Word], 3rd edn. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler.

11.

Frahm

(2013) Computerbasierte Testung der Rechtschreibleistung in Klasse fünf — Eine empirische Studie zu Mode-Effekten im Kontext des Nationalen Bildungspanels [Computer-based Testing of Orthography Competence in Grade 5 — an empirical study on mode effects in the context of the National Educational Panel Study]. Berlin: Logos.

12.

Frahm

Goy

Kowalski

(2011) Transition and Development from Lower Secondary to Upper Secondary School, in Blossfeld

H.-P.

Roßbach

H.-G.

& von Maurice

(Eds) Education as a Lifelong Process. The German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS), pp. 217–232. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

13.

Fraser

B.J.

Walberg

H.J.

Welch

W.W.

& Hattie

J.A.

(1987) Syntheses of Educational Productivity Research, International Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 147–252.

14.

Goy

Strietholt

& Bos

(2009) Reading Engagement of Fourth-grade Students. Results from PIRLS 2006 for Students From Different Socio-economic Backgrounds, in Plomp

Kupari

Bos

& Goy

(Chairpersons) Towards Explaining Achievement: Findings from international comparative achievement studies. Symposium conducted at the European Conference on Educational Research (ECER 2009), September, at University of Vienna, Austria.

15.

Guthrie

J.T.

Schafer

W.D.

& Huang

C.-W.

(2001) Benefits of Opportunity to Read and Balanced Instruction on the NAEP, Journal of Educational Research, 94(3), 145–162. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/00220670109599912

16.

Guthrie

J.T.

Wigfield

& You

(2012) Instructional Contexts for Engagement and Achievement in Reading, in Christenson

S.L.

Reschly

A.L.

& Wylie

(Eds) Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, pp. 601–634. New York: Springer.

17.

Kirsch

I.S.

de Jong

Lafontaine

McQueen

Mendelovits

& Monseur

(2002) Reading for Change. Performance and Engagement Across Countries. Results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD.

18.

Kunter

& Baumert

(2006) Who is the Expert? Construct and Criteria Validity of Student and Teacher Ratings of Instruction, Learning Environments Research, 9(3), 231–251. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1007/s10984-006-9015-7

19.

Lutz

S.L.

Guthrie

J.T.

& Davis

M.H.

(2006) Scaffolding for Engagement in Elementary School Reading Instruction, Journal of Educational Research, 100, 3–20. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.3200/JOER.100.1.3-20

20.

Mayer

K.U.

& Müller

(1986) The State and the Structure of the Life Course, in Sørensen

A.B.

Weinert

F.E.

& Sherrod

L.R.

(Eds) Human Development and the Life Course. Multidisciplinary Perspectives, pp. 217–245. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

21.

Mayer

K.U.

& Tuma

N.B.

(1990) Event History Analysis in Life Course Research. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

22.

McElvany

& Richter

(2009) Das Berliner Lesestrategie-Inventar (BLSI): Konzeption und Überprüfung der Objektivität, Reliabilität und Validität [The Berlin Reading Strategy Inventory: Development and psychometric qualities]. Unpublished manuscript, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, and University of Cologne.

23.

Möller

& Bonerad

E.-M.

(2007) Fragebogen zur habituellen Lesemotivation [Habitual Reading Motivation Questionnaire], Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 54, 259–267.

24.

Morgan

S.L.

& Winship

(2007) Counterfactuals and Causal Inference. Methods and Principles for Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1017/CBO9780511804564

25.

Murnane

R.J.

& Willett

J.B.

(2011) Methods Matter. Improving Causal Inference in Educational Research and Social Science Research. New York: Oxford University Press.

26.

National Educational Panel Study (2013) Research Projects with NEPS Data. https://www.neps-data.de/en-us/datacenter/researchprojects.aspx

27.

Rowan

Correnti

& Miller

R.J.

(2002) What Large-scale Survey Research Tells Us about Teacher Effects on Student Achievement: Insights from the ‘Prospects’ study of elementary schools, Teachers College Record, 104(8), 1525–1567. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1111/1467-9620.00212

28.

Russell

V.J.

Ainley

& Frydenberg

(2005) Schooling Issues Digest. Student Motivation and Engagement. Canberra: Australian Government, Department of Education, Service and Training.

29.

Scheerens

& Bosker

R.J.

(1997) The Foundations of Educational Effectiveness. Oxford: Pergamon.

30.

Schlotter

Schwerdt

& Wößmann

(2011) Econometric Methods for Causal Evaluation of Education Policies and Practices: A non-technical guide, Education Economics, 19(2), 109–137. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/09645292.2010.511821

31.

Schneider

Carnoy

Kilpatrick

Schmidt

W.H.

& Shavelson

R.J.

(2007) Estimating Causal Effects Using Experimental and Observational Designs. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

32.

Schneider

(2008) Entwicklung und Erfassung der Rechtschreibkompetenz im Jugend- und Erwachsenenalter, in Schneider

Marx

& Hasselhorn

(Eds) Diagnostik von Rechtschreibleistungen und –kompetenz [Diagnostics of achievement and competence in spelling], pp. 145–157. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

33.

Seidel

& Shavelson

R.J.

(2007) Teaching Effectiveness Research in the Past Decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results, Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 454–499. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.3102/0034654307310317

34.

von Maurice

Sixt

& Blossfeld

H.-P.

(2011) The German National Educational Panel Study: Surveying a cohort of 9th graders in Germany. NEPS Working Paper No. 3. Bamberg: Otto-Friedrich-Universität, Nationales Bildungspanel.

35.

Wang

M.C.

Haertel

G.D.

& Walberg

H.J.

(1993) Toward a Knowledge Base for School Learning, Review of Educational Research, 63(3), 249–294. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.3102/00346543063003249

36.

Wendt

Stubbe

T.C.

& Schwippert

(2012) Soziale Herkunft und Lesekompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern [Social Origin and Reading Competencies in Students], in Bos

Tarelli

Bremerich-Vos

& Schwippert

(Eds) IGLU 2011. Lesekompetenzen von Grundschulkindern in Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich [IGLU 2011. An International Comparison of Reading Competencies in Elementary Schoolchildren in Germany], pp. 175–190. Münster: Waxmann.