Equity: Policy Rhetoric or a Matter of Meaning of Knowledge? Towards a Framework for Tracing the ‘Efficiency-Equity’ Doctrine in Curriculum Documents

Abstract

In this article, the focus is on exploring the perspective of equity in curriculum. From a background of understanding curriculum as embedded in wider transnational policy movements, in this article the author suggests a framework for exploring the trajectories between equity policy and different types of curricula with implications for what counts as knowledge, drawing on the capabilities approach developed by Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum. The analysis highlights the instrumental, intrinsic and positional values in terms of actual functionings, expanding the individual's set of capabilities and a pluralistic learning environment. The results suggest that the technical form of the curriculum can have determining effects on the meaning of knowledge acquisition and that the capabilities approach offers an important frame of analysis for understanding how different aspects of equity are included or excluded in curriculum.

References

Bernstein

(2000) Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, research and critique. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Campbell

J.L.

(2004) Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Cort

(2010) Stating the Obvious: The European Qualifications Framework is not a neutral evidence-based policy tool, European Educational Research Journal, 9(3), 304–316. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2304/eerj.2010.9.3.304

European Commission (2006) Efficiency and Equity in European Education and Training Systems. Communication from the Commission to the Council and to the European Parliament. COM (2006) 481. Final. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

European Commission (2008a) Improving Competences for the 21st Century: An agenda for European cooperation on schools. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM (2008) 425. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

European Commission (2008b) Improving Competences for the 21st Century: An agenda for European cooperation on schools. Commission Staff Working Document accompanying the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. SEC (2008) 2177. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

European Commission (2012) Assessment of Key Competences in Initial Education and Training: Policy guidance. Commission Staff Working Document. SWD (2012) 371 final. Strasbourg: European Commission.

European Council (2006) Press Release. 2762nd Council Meeting: Education, Youth and Culture. Brussels, 13–14 November. 14965/06. Brussels: Council of the European Union.

Fairclough

(2010) Critical Discourse Analysis: The critical study of language. Harlow: Pearson.

10.

Fenwick

Mangez

& Ozga

(2014) World Yearbook of Education 2014. Governing Knowledge: Comparison, knowledge-based technologies and expertise in the regulation of education. London: Routledge.

11.

Gewirtz

(1998) Conceptualizing Social Justice in Education: Mapping the territory, Journal of Education Policy, 13(4), 469–484. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/0268093980130402

12.

Hartman

(2011) Slutsatser [Conclusions], in Hartman

(Ed.) Konkurrensens konsekvenser. Vad händer med svensk välfärd? [The Effects of Competition. What Happens to Swedish Welfare?] Stockholm: SNS Förlag.

13.

Kamens

D.H.

(2013) Globalization and the Emergence of an Audit Culture: PISA and the search for ‘best practices’ and magic bullets, in Meyer

H.-D.

& Benavot

(Eds) PISA, Power, and Policy: The emergence of global educational governance, pp. 117–139. Oxford: Symposium Books.

14.

Karseth

& Sivesind

(2010) Conceptualising Curriculum Knowledge within and beyond the National Context, European Journal of Education, 45(1), 103–120. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2009.01418.x

15.

Lingard

& Keddie

(2013) Redistribution, Recognition and Representation: Working against pedagogies of indifference, Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 21(3), 427–447. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/14681366.2013.809373

16.

Lingard

& Ozga

(2007) The RoutledgeFalmer Reader in Education Policy and Politics. London: Routledge.

17.

Lingard

Hayes

Mills

& Christie

(2003) Leading Learning: Making hope practical in schools. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

18.

Luke

Green

& Kelly

G.J.

(2010) Introduction. What Counts as Evidence and Equity? In Luke

Green

& Kelly

G.J.

(Eds) What Counts as Evidence in Educational Settings? Rethinking Equity, Diversity, and Reform in the 21st Century, pp. vii–xvi, Review of Research in Education, 34. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

19.

Luke

Woods

& Weir

(2013) Curriculum Design, Equity and the Technical Form of the Curriculum, in Luke

Woods

& Weir

(Eds) Curriculum, Syllabus Design and Equity, pp. 6–39. New York: Routledge.

20.

Maroy

(2012) Towards Post-bureaucratic Modes of Governance: A European perspective, in Steiner-Khamsi

& Waldow

(Eds) Policy Borrowing and Lending in Education, pp. 62–79. London: Routledge.

21.

Méhaut

& Winch

(2012) The European Qualification Framework: Skills, competences or knowledge? European Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 369–381. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.3.369

22.

Meyer

H.-D.

& Benavot

(2013) PISA and the Globalization of Education Governance: Some puzzles and problems, in Meyer

H.-D.

& Benavot

(Eds) PISA, Power and Policy: The emergence of global educational governance, pp. 9–26. Oxford: Symposium Books.

23.

Ministry of Education and Research (1994) Lpo 94. Läroplan för det obligatoriska skolväsendet, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet — Lpo 94 [Curriculum for the Compulsory School System, the Pre-School Class and the Leisure-time Centre. Lpo 94]. Stockholm: Swedish National Agency for Education.

24.

Ministry of Education and Research (2007) Official Reports 2007:28 Tydliga mål och kunskapskrav i skolan. Förslag till nytt mål- och uppföljningssystem. [Distinct Goals and Knowledge Requirements in School. Proposal for a New Goal- and Monitoring System]. Statens offentliga utredningar [Swedish Government Official Reports]. Stockholm: Fritzes.

25.

Ministry of Education and Research (2008) Bill 2008/09:87. Tydligare mål och kunskapskrav — Nya läroplaner för skolan [Clearer Goals and Knowledge Requirements in School — New curriculum for school]. Stockholm: Ministry of Education and Research.

26.

Ministry of Education and Research (2011) Lgr 11 Läroplan för grundskolan, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet 2011 [Curriculum for the Compulsory School, Preschool Class and the Recreation Centre, 2011]. Stockholm: Swedish National Agency for Education.

27.

Ministry of Education and Research (2013) Official Reports 2013:30 Det tar tid — Om effekter av skolpolitiska reformer [It Takes Time — On the Effects of School Policy Reforms]. Statens offentliga utredningar [Swedish Government Official Reports]. Stockholm: Fritzes.

28.

National Agency for Education (NAE) (2012) Likvärdig utbildning i svensk grundskola? En kvantitativ analys av likvärdighet over tid [Equivalent Education in Swedish Compulsory School? A Quantitative Analysis of Equivalence Over a Period of Time]. Report no. 374. Stockholm: Swedish National Agency for Education.

29.

National Agency for Education (NAE) (2013) Skolverkets lägesbedömning 2013 [The Swedish National Agency for Education Status Report in 2013]. Report no. 387. Stockholm: Swedish National Agency for Education.

30.

Nussbaum

Martha C.

(2000) Women and Human Development: The capabilities approach. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1017/CBO9780511841286

31.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2014) Resources, Policies and Practices in Sweden's Schooling System: An in-depth analysis of PISA 2012 Results. Paris: OECD.

32.

Priestley

(2011) Whatever Happened to Curriculum Theory? Critical Realism and Curriculum Change, Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 19(2), 221–237. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/03054980903518951

33.

Priestley

& Biesta

(2013) Introduction: The new curriculum, in Priestley

Mark

& Biesta

Gert

(Eds) Reinventing the Curriculum, pp. 1–12. London: Bloomsbury.

34.

Priestley

& Humes

(2010) The Development of Scotland's Curriculum for Excellence: Amnesia and déjà vu, Oxford Review of Education, 36(3), 345–361.

35.

Rizvi

& Lingard

(2010) Globalizing Education Policy. London: Routledge.

36.

Rosenmund

(2006) The Current Discourse on Curriculum Change: A comparative analysis of national reports on education, in Benavot

& Braslavsky

(Eds) School Knowledge in Comparative and Historical Perspective: Changing curricula in primary and secondary education, pp. 173–194. Hong Kong: Springer.

37.

Sellar

& Lingard

(2013) PISA and the Expanding Role of the OECD in Global Educational Governance, in Meyer

H.-D.

& Benavot

(Eds) PISA, Power, and Policy: The emergence of global educational governance, pp. 185–206. Oxford: Symposium Books.

38.

Sen

(1999) Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

39.

Sen

(2009) The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

40.

Sivesind

Van den Akker

& Rosenmund

(2012) The European Curriculum: Restructuring and renewal. Introduction, European Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 320–327. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.3.320

41.

Steiner-Khamsi

(2012) Understanding Policy Borrowing and Lending: Building comparative policy studies, in Steiner-Khamsi

& Waldow

(Eds) Policy Borrowing and Lending in Education, pp. 3–17. London: Routledge.

42.

Sundberg

& Wahlström

(2012) Standards-based Curricula in a Denationalized Conception of Education: The case of Sweden, European Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 342–356. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.3.342

43.

Unterhalter

& Brighouse

(2007) Distribution of What for Social Justice in Education? The Case of Education for All by 2015, in Walker

& Unterhalter

(Eds) Amartya Sen's Capability Approach and Social Justice in Education, pp. 67–86. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

44.

Wahlström

(2010) A European Space for Education Looking for its Public, European Educational Research Journal, 8(4), 432–443. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2304/eerj.2010.9.4.432

45.

Wahlström

(2011) Internationella konventioner och debatten om fristående skolor i Sverige [International conventions and the debate on independent schools in Sweden], in Englund

(Ed.) Utbildning som medborgerlig rättighet. Föräldrarätt eller barns rätt eller…? [Education as civil right. Parental rights or children's right or …?], pp. 87–127. Gothenburg: Daidalos.

46.

Wahlström

(2013) National and Transnational Conceptions of Knowledge in Swedish Curricula. Paper presented at the NERA (Nordic Educational Research Association) conference in Reykjavik, 7–9 March.

47.

Walker

& Unterhalter

(2007) Amartya Sen's Capability Approach and Social Justice in Education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1057/9780230604810

48.

Yates

(2013) Revisiting Curriculum, the Numbers Game and the Inequality Problem, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(1), 39–51. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/00220272.2012.754949

49.

Yates

& Young

(2010) Editorial. Globalisation, Knowledge and the Curriculum, European Journal of Education, 45(1), 4–10. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2009.01412.x

50.

Young

M.I.

(2006) Defining Valued Learning and Capability. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Human Development and Capability Association: ‘Freedom and Justice’, 29 August — 1 September, Groningen, the Netherlands.