Teacher and Student-Focused Approaches: Influence of Learning Approach and Self-Efficacy in a Psychology Postgraduate Sample

Abstract

The current study examined approaches to teaching in a postgraduate psychology sample. This included considering teaching-focused (information transfer) and student-focused (conceptual changes in understanding) approaches to teaching. Postgraduate teachers of psychology (N = 113) completed a questionnaire measuring their use of a teacher- or student-focused approach, deep and surface approaches to learning and teaching, and research self-efficacy. Standard multiple regressions revealed that the manner in which postgraduate students approached their own studies (i.e., deep or surface learning approach) predicted the use of a teacher- or student-focused approach in their teaching practice. Specifically, postgraduates adopting a deep approach to their own learning were more likely to adopt a teaching-focused approach to their teaching practice. Those adopting a surface approach to their own studies were most likely to adopt a student-focused approach. Furthermore, postgraduates with a high level of teaching self-efficacy were more likely to adopt a student-focused approach to teaching practice. Additionally, postgraduates who had received formal teaching training scored higher on teacher self-efficacy than those who had not received such training. Taken together, the findings suggest the key role of formal training in enhancing self-efficacy in teaching, and demonstrate an association between the learning styles adopted by postgraduate teachers and their approach to teaching.

References

Astin

A. W.

, & Chang

M. J.

(1995). Colleges that emphasize research and teaching. Change, 27, 45–49. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/00091383.1995.9936447

Bandura

(1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.

Bartel

Cameron

Wiggins

, & Wiggins

(2004). Implications of generalist teachers' self-efficacy related to music. In Shand

P. M.

(Ed.), Music education entering the 21st century (pp. 85–90). Nedlands, Australia: International Society for Music Education.

Bates

A. B.

Kim

, & Latham

(2011). Linking pre-service teachers' mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics teaching self-efficacy to their mathematical performance. School Science and Mathematics, 111, 325–333. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00095.x

Biggs

Kember

, & Leung

D. Y. P.

(2001). The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133–149. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1348/000709901158433

Boyer

(1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

DeChenne

S. E.

(2011). Learning to teach effectively: Science, technology, engineering and mathematics graduate teaching assistants' teaching self-efficacy. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A, 71(7-A), 2364.

Elton

(2001). Research and teaching: Conditions for a positive link. Teaching in Higher Education, 6, 43–56. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/13562510020029590

Ghaith

, & Yaghi

(1997). Relationships among experience, teacher efficacy and attitudes towards the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 451–458. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/S0742-051X(96)00045-5

10.

Gibbs

, & Coffey

(2004). The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5, 87–100. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/1469787404040463

11.

Gilbert

, & Gibbs

(1999). A proposal for an international collaborative research programme to identify the impact of initial training on University teachers. Research and Development in Higher Education, 21, 131–143.

12.

Gow

, & Kember

(1993). Conceptions of teaching and their relationship to student learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 20–33. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01039.x

13.

Jenkins

Breen

Lindsay

, & Brew

(2003). Reshaping Higher Education: Linking teaching and research. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

14.

Kane

Sandretto

, & Heath

(2002). Telling half the story: A critical review of research on the teaching beliefs and practices of university academics. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 177–228. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.3102/00346543072002177

15.

Kember

, & Gow

(1994). Orientations to teaching and their effect on the quality of student learning. Journal of Higher Education, 65, 58–73. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2307/2943877

16.

Khorrami-Arani

(2001). Researching computer self-efficacy. International Educational Journal, 4, 17–25.

17.

Lantz

Smith

, & Branney

(2008). Psychology postgraduates' perspectives on teaching-related support and training. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 7, 37–45. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2304/plat.2008.7.1.37

18.

Lea

S. J.

Stephenson

, & Troy

(2003). Higher Education students' attitudes to student-centred learning: Beyond ‘educational bulimia’. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 321–334. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/03075070309293

19.

Lueddeke

G. R.

(1997). Training postgraduates for teaching: Considerations for programme planning and development. Teaching in Higher Education, 2, 141–151. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/1356251970020204

20.

Luft

Kurdziel

J. P.

Roehrig

, & Turner

(2004). Growing a garden without water: Graduate teaching assistants in introductory science courses at a doctoral/research institution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 211–233. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1002/tea.20004

21.

Meyer

J. H. F.

, & Eley

(2006). The approaches to teaching inventory: A critique of its development and applicability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(3), 633–649.

22.

Myers

(2000). Training in the teaching of psychology: What is done and examining the differences. Teaching of Psychology, 27, 258–261. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1207/S15328023TOP2704_03

23.

National Postgraduate Committee (2001). Postgraduate students as teachers. Retrieved 23 December, 2011, from http://www.npc.org.uk/poatgraduatefactsandissues/aboutpostgraduates/postgraduatestudentsasteachers

24.

Prosser

, & Trigwell

(1998). Teaching in Higher Education. In Dartt

& Boulton-Lewis

(Eds.), Teaching and learning in Higher Education (pp. 250–267). Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.

25.

Prosser

, & Trigwell

(1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press.

26.

Prosser

, & Trigwell

(2006). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 405–419. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1348/000709905X43571

27.

Scholz

Dona

B. G.

Sud

, & Schwarzer

(2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 242–251. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1027//1015-5759.18.3.242

28.

Schunk

D. H.

(1991). Self efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207–231.

29.

Schwarzer

, & Jerusalem

(1995). General Self-Efficacy Scale. In Weinman

Wright

, & Johnson

, Measures in health psychology: A user's portfolio: Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35–37). Windsor: NFER-Nelson.

30.

Schwarzer

Schmitz

G. S.

, & Daytner

G. T.

(1999). The Teacher Self-efficacy Scale. Retrieved 11 May, 2011, from: http://www.fu-berlin.de/gesund/skalen/t_se.htm

31.

Trigwell

, & Prosser

(1996). Congruence between intention and strategy in science teachers' approach to teaching. Higher Education, 32, 77–87. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1007/BF00139219

32.

Trigwell

, & Prosser

(2004). Development and use of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 409–424. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1007/s10648-004-0007-9

33.

Trigwell

Prosser

, & Waterhouse

(1999). Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37, 57–70. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1023/A:1003548313194

34.

Tuchman

, & Isaacs

(2011). The influence of formal and informal formative pre-service experiences on teacher self-efficacy. Educational Psychology, 31, 413–433. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/01443410.2011.560656

35.

Viel-Ruma

Houchins

Jolivette

, & Benson

(2010). Efficacy beliefs of Special Educators: The relationships among collective efficacy, teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33, 225–233. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/0888406409360129

36.

Weimer

, & Lenze

L. F.

(1997). Instructional interventions: A review of the literature on efforts to improve instruction. In Perry

R. P.

& Smart

J. C.

(Eds.), Effective teaching in Higher Education: Research and practice. New York: Agathon Press.

37.

Wertheim

, & Leyser

(2002). Efficacy beliefs, background variables, and differentiated instruction of Israeli prospective teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 68, 202–248.

38.

Zhang

(2004). Do university students' thinking styles matter in their preferred teaching approaches? Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1551–1564. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.paid.2004.02.012