Relationships Between Grades in the Components of Freshman Music Theory and Selected Background Variables

Abstract

The relative contributions of measures of academic ability, music experience, and musical aptitude in predicting grades in the written-work, ear-training, sight-singing, and keyboard-harmony components of each of two freshman music theory courses were determined by multiple regression techniques. The best predictor of grades in the written-work component of both semester courses and in the ear-training component of the first semester course was the math portion of the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT). Measures of music experience and musical aptitude were the best predictors of grades in the sight-singing and keyboard-harmony components of both semester courses and in the ear-training component of the second-semester course. The results of canonical correlation analysis of the first-semester data suggested the presence of one general dimension.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Afifi, A. A. , & Clark, V. (1984). Computer-aided multivariate analysis (169–172). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Cooley, J. C. (1961). A study of the relation between certain mental and personality traits and ratings of musical abilities. Journal of Research in Music Education, 9, 108–117.

Daniels, R. W. (1986). Relationships among selected factors and the sight-reading ability of high school mixed choirs. Journal of Research in Music Education, 34, 279–289.

Dixon, W. J. (Ed.). (1987). BMDP statistical software. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Educational Testing Service. (1948-87). College Board Scholastic Aptitude Test. Princeton, NJ: Author.

Elliott, C. A. (1982). The relationships among instrumental sight-reading ability and seven selected predictor variables. Journal of Research in Music Education, 30, 5–14.

Gordon, E. (1965). Musical Aptitude Profile. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Harrison, C. S. (1987). The validity of the Musical Aptitude Profile for predicting grades in freshman music theory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 477–482.

Harrison, C. S. (1990). Predicting music theory grades: The relative efficiency of academic ability, music experience and musical aptitude. Journal of Research in Music Education, 37, 124–137.

10.

Jones, M. S. (1979). An investigation of the difficulty levels of selected tonal patterns as perceived aurally and performed vocally by high school students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

11.

Norusis, M.J. (1986). SPSS/PC + [Computer program]. Chicago: SPSS.

12.

Pembrook, R. G. , & Taylor, J. A. (1986). Relationships between scores on a melodic discrimination test and the background variables of prospective college music students. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 88, 1–21.

13.

Rodeheaver, R. E. (1972). An investigation of the vocal sight-reading ability of college freshmen music majors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oklahoma, Norman.

14.

Salis, D. L. (1977). The identification and assessment of cognitive variables associated with reading of advanced musk at the piano. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.

15.

Schleuter, S. L. (1978). The development of a college version of the Musical Aptitude Profile. Psychology of Musk, 6, 39–42.

16.

Schleuter, S. L. (1983). A predictive study of an experimental version of the Musical Aptitude Profile with certain music achievement of college music majors. Psychology of Music, 11, 32–36.

17.

Schleuter, S. L. , & Schleuter, L. J. (1978). A predictive study of an experimental college version of the Musical Aptitude Profile with music achievement of nonmusic majors. Contributions to Musk Education, 6, 2–8.

18.

Thostenson, M. S. (1967). The study and evaluation of certain problems in ear-training related to achievement in sight-singing and music dictation. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 11, 14–35.

19.

Tucker, D. W. (1969). Factors related to musical reading ability of senior high school students partkipating in choral groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

20.

Wilkinson, L. (1987). SYSTAT: The system for statistics. Evanston, IL: SYSTAT.