The purpose of the study was to investigate the perceptions of music majors and nonmusic I majors concerning combined frequency and tempo changes in music across a range of musical tempi. The subjects, 200 music majors and 200 nonmusic majors, heard 10 consecutive presentations of an orchestral excerpt, each of which had been altered by changing the frequency or tempo (or both) of the original version in various combinations. The task was to compare each example to the preceding version and indicate perceived pitch and tempo changes. This comparison procedure was replicated using four different music excerpts, in which the speeds of the fastest moving voices were approximately 50, 100, 150, and 200 per minute. Each of the 400 subjects was randomly assigned to two of the four replications. Results indicated that (a) music majors and nonmusic majors responded similarly across conditions and replications; (b) changes in tempo were discriminated more accurately than frequency changes of the same magnitude; (c) tempo changes seemed to affect pitch perception to a greater extent than frequency changes affected the perception of tempo; and (d) the speed of subdivided beats apparently affected the perception of changes in frequency and tempo across replications.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Drake, A. H. (1968). An experimental study of selected variables in the performance of musical durational notation.Journal of Research in Music Education, 16, 329–338.
2.
Duke, R. A. (1987a). The effect of melodic rhythm on undergraduates' perception of relative tempo.Contributions to Music Education, 14, 19–28.
3.
Duke, R. A. (1987b, March). Melodic rhythm and tempo perception: Judgments of relative tempo by elementary children and college undergraduates. Paper presented at the Seventh National Symposium for Research in Music Behavior, Logan, UT.
4.
Duke, R. A., Madsen, C. K., & Geringer, J. M. (1986). The effect of speed alterations on high school musicians' tempo note selections.Journal of Band Research, 21, 37–46.
5.
Geringer, J. M. (1976). Tuning preferences in recorded orchestral music.Journal of Research in Music Education, 24, 169–176.
6.
Geringer, J. M. (1978). Intonational performance and perception of ascending scales.Journal of Research in Music Education, 26, 32–40.
7.
Geringer, J. M. (1983). The relationship of pitch-matching and pitch-discrimination abilities of pre-school and fourth-grade students.Journal of Research in Music Education, 31, 93–99.
8.
Geringer, J. M., & Madsen, C. K. (1984). Pitch and tempo discrimination in recorded orchestral music among musicians and nonmusicians.Journal of Research in Music Education, 32, 195–204.
9.
Geringer, J. M., & Madsen, C. K. (1987). Pitch and tempo preferences in recorded popular music. In C. K. Madsen & C. K. Prickett (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 204–212). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
10.
Geringer, J. M., & Witt, A. C. (1985). An investigation of tuning performance and perception of string instrumentalists.Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 81, 90–101.
11.
Greer, R. D. (1970). The effect of timbre on brass wind intonation. In E. Gordon (Ed.), Research in music: Studies in the psychology of music, 6 (pp. 65–94). Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
12.
Kantorski, V. J. (1986). String instrument intonation in upper and lower registers: The effects of accompaniment.Journal of Research in Music Education, 34, 200–210.
13.
Kuhn, T. L. (1974). Discrimination of modulated beat tempo by professional musicians.Journal of Research in Music Education, 22, 270–277.
14.
Kuhn, T. L. (1977). Effects of dynamics, halves of exercise, and trial sequences on tempo accuracy.Journal of Research in Music Education, 25, 222–227.
15.
Kuhn, T. L. (1987). The effect of tempo, meter, and melodic complexity on the perception of tempo. In C. K. Madsen & C. A. Prickett (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp 165–174). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
16.
Kuhn, T. L., & Booth, G. D. (1987, March). The perception of tempo: Experiment 1, effect of audible beat, melodic activity, and tempo; Experiment 2, effect of size of tempo change and melodic activity. Paper presented at the Seventh National Symposium for Research in Music Behavior, Logan, UT.
17.
Kuhn, T. L., & Gates, E. E. (1975). Effects of notational values, age and example length on tempo performance accuracy.Journal of Research in Music Education, 23, 203–210.
18.
Le Blanc, A. (1981). Effects of style, tempo, and performing medium on children's music preference.Journal of Research in Music Education, 29, 143–156.
19.
Madsen, C. K. (1966). The effect of scale direction on pitch acuity in solo vocal performance.Journal of Research in Music Education, 14, 266–275.
20.
Madsen, C. K. (1974). Sharpness and flatness in scalar vocal performance.Science de l'Art: Scientific Aesthetics, 9, 91–97.
21.
Madsen, C. K. (1979). Modulated beat discrimination among musicians and nonmusicians.Journal of Research in Music Education, 27, 57–67.
22.
Madsen, C. K., Duke, R. A., & Geringer, J. M. (1984). Pitch and tempo discrimination in recorded band music among wind and percussion musicians.Journal of Band Research, 20, 20–29.
23.
Madsen, C. K., Duke, R. A., & Geringer, J. M. (1986). The effect of speed alteration on tempo note selection.Journal of Research in Music Education, 34, 101–110.
24.
Madsen, C. K., Edmonson, F. A., & Madsen, C. H. (1969). Modulated frequency discrimination in relationship to age and musical training.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 46, 1468–1472.
25.
Madsen, C. K., & Geringer, J. M. (1976). Preferences for trumpet tone quality versus intonation.Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 46, 13–22.
26.
Madsen, C. K., & Madsen, C. H., Jr. (1972). Selection of music listening or candy as a function of contingent versus noncontingent reinforcement and scale singing.Journal of Music Therapy, 9, 190–198.
27.
Madsen, C. K., Wolfe, D. E., & Madsen, C. H. (1969). The effect of reinforcement and directional scalar methodology on intonational improvement.Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 18, 22–33.
28.
Mason, J. A. (1960). Comparison of solo and ensemble performances with reference to Pythagorean, just, and equi-tempered intonations.Journal of Research in Music Education, 8, 31–38.
29.
Salzberg, R. S. (1980). The effects of visual stimulus and instruction on intonation accuracy of string instrumentalists.Psychology of Music, 8, 42–49.
30.
Schoen, M. (1922). An experimental study of the pitch factor in artistic singing.Psychological Monographs, 31, 230–259.
31.
Small, A. M. (1937). An objective analysis of artistic violin performance.University of Iowa Studies in the Psychology of Music, 4, 172–231.
32.
Wang, C. C. (1983). Discrimination of modulated music tempo by music majors.Journal of Research in Music Education, 31, 49–55.
33.
Wang, C. C., & Salzberg, R. S. (1984). Discrimination of modulated music tempo by string students.Journal of Research in Music Education, 32, 123–131.
34.
Wapnick, J. (1980). Pitch, tempo, and timbral preferences in recorded piano music.Journal of Research in Music Education, 28, 43–58.
35.
Yarbrough, C. (1987). The effect of music excerpts on tempo discriminations and preferences of musicians and non-musicians. In C. K. Madsen & C. A. Prickett (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 175–189). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
