Musicians' and Nonmusicians' Assessment of Perceived Rubato in Musical Performance

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate musicians' and nonmusicians' assessment of perceived rubato in musical performance. Music majors (n = 48) and nonmusic majors (n = 48) listened to four different soloists' performances of the development section of Mozart's Concerto for Horn and Orchestra No. 2, movement 1. Subjects evaluated the degree of appropriateness/inappropriateness of each soloist's use of rubato using the Continuous Response Digital Interface (CRDI), an instrument that allows ongoing evaluation of specified performance variables. Using a Likert-type scale, subjects also assessed soloists with regard to musicianship, expression, tone quality, and tempo. Results indicated significant differences for musicians compared to nonmusicians regarding rubato assessments. Musicians agreed with expert assessments, whereas non-musicians' scores seemed haphazard. When musicians were separated into two groups based on musical skill level, results from the “more proficient” musicians were in direct agreement with the panel of experts' evaluations. The “less proficient” musicians were much less discriminating across all dependent measures; rubato assessments disagreed substantially with those of experts. This study suggests that rubato is an extremely subtle musical nuance. Though nonmusicians and less proficient musicians seem to be able to assess performances on somewhat more obvious variables, it seems that only the most proficient musicians can evaluate the usage of rubato in performance. Based on the data from this study, it appears that a relationship exists between musicianship and the use of rubato and that use of rubato might well be one element that separates the very finest performance from the simply ordinary.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anastasi, A . (1987). Psychological testing (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.

Bengtsson, I ., & Gabrielsson, A. (1980). Methods for analyzing performance of musical rhythm. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 21, 257–268.

Brain, D. [Swallisch directing the Philharmonia Orchestra] (1986). Strauss, R., Concerto number 1 in E-flat major, op. 11 (CD Recording No. CDC-7 47834 2). EMI Records Limited.

Brittin, R. V. (1991). The effect of overtly categorizing music on preference for popular music styles. Journal of Research in Music Education, 39, 143–151.

Capperella, D. A. (1989). Reliability of the Continuous Response Digital Interface for data collection in the study of auditory perception. Southeastern Journal of Music Education, 1, 19–32.

Capperella-Sheldon, D. A. (1992). Self-perception of aesthetic experience among musicians and nonmusicians in response to wind band music. Journal of Band Research, 28(1), 57–71.

Civil, A. [Marriner directing the Academy of St. Martin-in-the-Fields] (1971). Mozart, W. A, Concerto number 2 in E-flat major for horn and orchestra, KV. 417 (Compact Disk Recording No. 420 709-2). Philips.

Clarke, E. F. (1982). Timing in the performance of Erik Satie's “Vexations.” Acta Psychologica, 50, 1–19.

Clarke, E. F. (1989). The perception of expressive timing in music. Special Issue: Rhythm perception, rhythm production, and timing. Psychological Research, 51, 2–9.

10.

Clarke, E ., & Baker-Short, C. (1987). The imitation of perceived rubato: A preliminary study. Psychology of Music, 15, 58–75.

11.

Cooper, G. W. , & Meyer, L. B. (1960). The rhythmic structure of music. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

12.

Ducopin, J. [Lizzio directing the Mozart Festival Orchestra]. (1991). Mozart, W. A., Concerto number 2 in E-flat major for horn and orchestra, KV. 417 (CD Recording No. CDQ2080). Quintessence.

13.

Falout, J. [Lizzio directing the Mozart Festival Orchestra]. (1989). W. A. Mozart: Concerto number 2 in E-flat major for horn and orchestra, KV. 417 (CD Recording No. Vivace 568). Vivace.

14.

Fredrickson, W. E. (1992, November). Devices for recording ongoing responses to music in education and therapy. Paper presented at the National Association for Music Therapy National Conference, St. Louis, MO.

15.

Gabrielsson, A . (1974). Performance of rhythm patterns. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 15, 63–72.

16.

Gabrielsson, A . (1982). Performance and training of musical rhythm. Psychology of Music, Special Issue, 42–46.

17.

Gabrielsson, A. , Bengtsson, I. , & Gabrielsson, B. (1983). Performance of musical rhythm in 3/4 and 6/8 meter. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 24, 193–213.

18.

Gregory, D. G. (1989). Using computers to measure continuous music responses. Psychomusicology, 8, 127–134.

19.

Gregory, D. G. , & Sims, W. L. (1987). Music preference analysis with computers. Journal of Music Therapy, 24, 203–212.

20.

Johnson, C. M. (1992a, January). The ability of musicians to track rubato in ongoing musical performance. Paper presented at the state conference of the Florida State Music Educators Association.

21.

Johnson, C. M. (1992b). Use of the Continuous Response Digital Interface in the adjudication of high school band festival performances. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 20, 261–271.

22.

Lundin, R. W. (1967). An objective psychology of music. New York: Ronald Press.

23.

Madsen, C. K , Brittin, R V. , & Capperella-Sheldon, D. A. (1993). An empirical method for measuring the aesthetic experience to music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 57–69.

24.

Madsen, C. K , & Fredrickson, W. E. (1993). The experience of musical tension: A replication of Nielsen's research using the Continuous Response Digital Interface. Journal of Music Therapy, 30, 46–63.

25.

Madsen, C. K , & Geringer, J. M. (1990). Differential patterns of music listening: Focus of attention of musicians versus nonmusicians. Bulletin of the Council of Research in Music Education, no. 105, 45–57.

26.

Palmer, C . (1989). Mapping musical thought to musical performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 331–346.

27.

Povel, D. J. (1977). Temporal structure of performed music Acta Psychologica, 41, 309–320.

28.

Povel, D. J. (1985). Time, rhythms, and tension: In search of the determinants of rhythmicity. In J. A. Michon & J. L. Jackson (Eds.), Time, mind, and behavior (pp. 215–225). New York: Springer-Verlag.

29.

Radocy, R. E. , & Boyle, D. J. (1988). Psychological foundations of music behavior (2nd ed.). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

30.

Robinson, C. R. (1988). Differentiated modes of choral performance evaluation using traditional procedures and a Continuous Response Digital Interface device. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.

31.

Rose, R. F (1989). An analysis of timing in jazz rhythm section performance. Dissertation Abstracts International, 50, 3509A. (University Microfilms No. 9005520)

32.

Sachs, C . (1953). Rhythm and tempo. London: Dent Publishing.

33.

Shaffer, L. H. (1981). Performances of Chopin, Bach and Bartok: Studies in motor programming. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 327–376.

34.

Shaffer, L. H. (1983). Timing in musical performance. New York Academy of Sciences Conference on Timing and Time Perception: Rhythmic patterns and music (1983, New York, NY). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 423, 420–428.

35.

Shaffer, L. H. (1984). Timing in solo and duet piano performances. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology/Human Experimental Psychology, 36A, 577–595.

36.

Watkins, R. [Hickox directing the City of London Sinfonia] (1987). Concerto number 2 in E-flat major for horn and orchestra, KV. 417 (CD Recording No. PCD 865). Innovative Music Productions.

37.

Wilkinson, L . (1990). SYSTAT: The system for statistics [Computer program]. Evanston, IL: SYSTAT, Inc.

38.

Winer, B. J. , Brown, D. R , & Michels, K M. (1991). Statistical principles in experimental design (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.