A 30-Year Follow-Up Study of Actual Applied Music Practice versus Estimated Practice

Abstract

This study was designed to determine if adults are able to remember how much time they actually spent practicing during a past time period of their lives where detailed daily records were kept of actual number of minutes practiced. It also addressed how past practice time relates to their highest level of musical performance across the 30 years on a scale of top-level expert to competent. Responses were divided into six classifications: (1) professional, (2) semiprofessional, (3) free-lance musician/college instructor, (4) music teacher, (5) community musician, and (6) jury/senior recital. Results indicated that after a 30-year period, students are not accurate in assessing past amounts of applied music practice when comparing records of actual practice time to later perceptions of this practice time. Also, there is not a strong relationship between practice time and their highest level of performance, although most participants indicate that they believe that there is.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Campbell, D. T. , & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand Mc Nally.

Ericsson, K. A. (1997). Deliberate practice and the acquisition of expert performance: An overview. In H. Jorgensen & A. C. Lehmann (Eds.), Does practice make perfect? Current theory and research on instrumental music practice (pp. 9–51). Oslo, Norway: Norges Musisikkhøgskole.

Ericsson K. A. , Krampe, R. T. , & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100 (3), 363–406.

Gagne, F. (1999). Nature or nurture? A re-examination of Sloboda and Howe's (1991) interview study on talent development in music. Psychology of Music, 27, 38–51.

Hallam, S. (1997). Approaches to instrumental music practice of experts and novices. In H. Jorgensen & A. C. Lehmann (Eds.), Does practice make perfect! Current theory and research on instrumental music practice (pp. 89–107). Oslo, Norway: Norges Musisikkhøgskole.

Howe, M J. A. , Davidson, J. W. , & Sloboda, J. A. (1998). Innate talents: Reality of myth. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 399–407.

Lehmann, A. D. , & Ericsson, K. A. (1997). Research of expert performance and deliberate practice: Implication for the education of amateur musicians and music students. Psychomusicology, 16, 40–58.

Madsen, C. K. , & Duke, R. A. (1985a). Perception of approval/disapproval in music education. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 85, 119–130.

Madsen, C. K. , & Duke, R. A. (1985b). Observation of approval/disapproval feedback in music: Perception versus actual classroom events. Journal of Research in Music Education, 33, 205–214.

10.

Madsen, C. K. , & Madsen, C. H. (1998). Teaching/Discipline: Behavioral principles toward a positive approach. Raleigh, NC: Contemporary Publishing Co.

11.

Madsen, C. K. , & Yarbrough, C. (1975). The effect of experimental design on the isolation of dependent and independent variables. In C. K. Madsen , C. H. Madsen Jr. , & R. D. Greer (Eds.), Research in music behavior: Modifying music behavior in the classroom (pp. 226–243). New York: Teachers College Press.

12.

Mc Pherson, G. E. , & Mc Cormick, J. (1999). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of musical practice. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 141, 98–102.

13.

Mc Cormick, J. , & Mc Pherson, G. (2003). The role of self-efficacy in a musical performance examination: An exploratory structural equation analysis. Psychology of Music, 31 (1), 37–51.

14.

Rohwer, D. (2002). Understanding practice: An investigation and applications. International Journal of Music Education, 40, 15–25.

15.

Wagner, M. (1975). The effect of a practice report of practice time on musical performance. In C. K. Madsen , C. H. Madsen Jr. , & R. Douglas Greer (Eds.), Research in music behavior: Modifying music behavior in the classroom (pp. 125–130). New York: Teachers College Press.