We investigated different levels of age and musical training in relation to subjects' melodic perception in music by testing their ability to perceive a target melody when extremely similar melodies are interpolated between this original melody and its reoccurrence. Participants were sixth graders, eighth graders, young adults, and trained musicians who listened to 16 original melodies, each of which was followed by 8 extremely similar melodies. Two different experiments (A and B) tested different arrangements of mode and meter interpolations. We also asked the adult musicians to specify cognitive strategies for accomplishing the task. Results demonstrated greater accuracy among experienced musicians, yet results show that even young students are capable of remembering and discriminating similar melodies with high accuracy. Written analyses of strategies used by musicians indicated they considered the task extremely difficult and that their past musical training helped with the task; they also indicated that children could not do this task, which was not the case.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Attneave, R., & Olson, R. K. (1971). Pitch as a medium: A new approach to psychophysical scaling. American Journal of Psychology, 84, 147–166.
2.
Boltz, M. G. (1998). The processing of temporal and nontemporal information in the remembering of event durations and musical structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception Of Performance, 24 (4), 1087–1104.
3.
Booth, G. D., & Cutietta, R. A. (1991). The applicability of verbal processing strategies to recall of familiar songs. Journal of Research in Music Education, 39, 121–131.
4.
Burnsed, V. (2001). Differences in preference for subtle dynamic nuance between conductors, middle school music students, and elementary school students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49, 49–56.
5.
Croonen, W. (1991). Recognition of tone series containing tonic triads. Music Perception, 9 (2), 490–498.
6.
Collings, D. S. (1966). Principles of retroactive inhibition applied to melodic discrimination. Unpublished master's thesis, The Florida State University, Tallahassee.
7.
Cuddy, L. L., & Cohen, J. A. (1976). Recognition of transposed melodic sequences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 255–270.
8.
Davies, J. B. (1980). Memory for melodies and tonal sequences: A brief note. Unpublished paper, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland.
9.
Davies, J. B., & Jennings, J. (1997). Reproduction of familiar melodies and the perception of tonal sequences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61 (2), 534–541.
10.
Davies, J. B., & Yelland, A. (1977). Effects of two training procedures on the production of melodic contour in short-term memory for tonal sequences. Psychology of Music, 5 (2), 3–9.
11.
Deutsch, D. (1972). Effect of repetition of standard and comparison tones on recognition memory for pitch. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93 (1), 152–162.
12.
Deutsch, D. (1973). Octave generalization of specific interference effects in memory for tonal pitch. Perception and Psychophysics, 13 (2), 271–275.
13.
Deutsch, D. (1975). Facilitation by repetition in recognition memory for tonal pitch. Memory & Cognition, 3 (3), 263–266.
14.
Deutsch, D. (1978). Interference in pitch memory as a function of ear or input. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30 (2), 283–287.
15.
Deutsch, D. (1979). Tones and numbers: Specificity of interference in short-term memory. Science, 168, 1604–1605.
16.
Deliege, I. (2001). Similarity perception categorization cue abstraction. Music Perception, 18 (3), 233–243.
17.
Dowling, W. J. (1973). The perception of interleaved melodies. Cognitive Psychology, 5 (3), 322–337.
18.
Dowling, W.J. (1978). Scale and contour: Two components of a theory of memory for melodies. Psychological Review, 85 (4), 341–354.
19.
Dowling, W. J., & Fujitani, D. S. (1971). Contour, interval, and pitch recognition in memory for melodies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49 (2), 524–531.
20.
Halpern, A. R., Bartlett, J. C., & Dowling, W.J. (1995). Aging and experience in the recognition of musical transpositions. Psychology &f Aging, 10(5), 325–342.
21.
Holahan, J. M., Saunders, T. C., & Goldberg, M. D. (2000). Tonal cognition in pattern discrimination: Evidence from three populations. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48, 162–177.
22.
Koniari, D., Predazzer, S., & Melen, M. (2001). Categorization and schematization processes used in music perception by 10–11-year-old children. Music Perception, 18 (3), 297–324.
23.
Krumhansl, C. L. (1990). Tonal hierarchies and rare intervals in music cognition. Music Perception, 7 (3), 53–96.
24.
Large, E. W., Palmer, C., & Pollack, J. B. (1995). Reduced memory representation for music. Cognitive Science, 19 (1), 53–96.
25.
Lerdahl, A., & Jackendoff, R.J. (1983). A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
Long, P. A. (1977). Relationship between pitch memory in short melodies and selected factors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 25, 272–282.
27.
Madsen, C. K. (1999). Research in music behavior. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 33 (4), 77–92.
28.
Madsen, C. K. (2000). Discrimination and interference in recall of melodic stimuli: Musically trained and untrained adults versus children. In C. Woods, G. Luck, R. Brochard, F. Seddon, & J. A. Sloboda (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition. Keele, UK.
29.
Madsen, C. K., Collings, D., Mc Leod, B., & Madsen, C. H. Jr. (1969, March). Music and language arts. Paper presented at NAMT Regional Convention, Atlanta.
30.
Madsen, C. K., & Madsen, M. K. (2001, February). Perception and cognition in music: Trained musicians versus children. Paper presented at the Southern Division Conference of MENC: The National Association for Music Education, Louisville, KY.
31.
Madsen, C. K., & Madsen, C. H., Jr. (1998). Teaching/Discipline: Behavior principles toward a positive approach. Raleigh, NC: Contemporary Publishing Company of Raleigh, Inc.
32.
Madsen, C. K., & Staum, M.J. (1983). Discrimination and interference in the recall of melodic stimuli. Journal of Research in Music Education, 31, 15–31.
33.
Massaro, D. W. (1970). Consolidation and interference in the perceptual memory system. Perception and Psychophysics, 7 (3), 153–156.
34.
Massaro, D. W. (1971). Effect of masking tone duration on perceptual auditory images. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 87 (1), 146–148.
35.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits of our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
36.
Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1974). Human memory: Theory and data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
37.
Robertson, B.J. (1998). Discrimination and interference in the recall of melodic stimuli by Asian students and their spouses. Unpublished master's thesis, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
38.
Taylor, J. A. (1972). Perception of melodic intervals within melodic context. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, 1971). Dissertation Abstracts International, 32, 6481A–6482A.
39.
Taylor, J. A. (1989, April). Psychomusicology: Perceptual cognitive research with implications for the composer and performer. Paper presented at the annual meeting of The College Music Society, Denver, CO.
40.
Tanguiane, A. S. (1994). A principle of correlatively of perception and its application to music recognition. Music Perception, 11 (4), 39–48.
41.
Trainer, L. J., & Trehub, S. E. (1993). What mediates infants' and adults' superior processing of the major over the augmented triad. Music Perception, 11 (2), 185–196.
42.
Tsuzaki, M. (1991). Effects of the preceding scale on melodic interval judgment in terms of equality and size. Music Perception, 9 (1), 47–70.
43.
Wickelgren, W. A. (1969). Associative strength theory of recognition memory for pitch. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 6, 13–61.
