The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of modeling conditions and tempo patterns on the performance of high school instrumentalists. The independent variables of this study were (a) model versus no model and (b) steady increase of tempo versus performance speed tempo versus alternating (slower and faster) tempos. Subjects (N = 60) were high school wind instrumentalists from the American Midwest and South. Subjects sight-read an étude and then practiced the same étude six times using one of six practice conditions that combined the two independent variables. Subjects then performed a posttest on the same étude. Dependent measures were pretest-posttest gain score comparisons (as percentages) of correct pitches and rhythms as well as overall percentages of tempo gains. Results demonstrated the with-model condition to be superior to the no-model condition in rhythm percentage gain and tempo percentage gain. Tempo patterns had no significant effect on results.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barry, N. H. (1990). The effects of different practice techniques upon technical accuracy and musicality in student instrumental music performance. Research Perspectives in Music Education: A Bulletin of the Florida Music Educators Association, 1, 4–8.
2.
Barry, N. H. (1991). A comparison of advanced student musicians' and professional musicians' practice attitudes and strategies. Southeastern Journal of Music Education, 3, 32–41.
3.
Barry, N. H. (1992). The effects of practice strategies, individual differences in cognitive style, and gender upon technical accuracy and musicality of student instrumental performance. Psychology of Music, 20, 112–123.
4.
Barry, N. H., & Mc Arthur, V. (1994). Teaching practice strategies in the music studio: A survey of applied music teachers. Psychology of Music, 22, 44–55.
5.
Brooks, R.W. (1995). Mental practice and the musician: A practical approach to practice. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 13 (2), 4–8.
6.
Bruser, M. (1997). The art of practicing.New York: Bell Tower.
7.
Dickey, M. R. (1992). A review of research on modeling in music teaching and learning. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 113, 27–40.
8.
Donald, L. S. (1997). The organization of rehearsal tempos and efficiency of motor skill acquisition in piano performance (Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, 1997). Ann Arbor, Michigan: UMI. Microform 9822743.
9.
Dunham, P., Jr., & Frens, G. (1983). Effect of specificity and shaping practice on the acquisition of a simple motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 57, 875–878.
10.
Dunham, P., Jr., & Kell, J. (1980). Effect of shaping on the acquisition of a simple motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 50, 98.
11.
Hallam, S. (1995). Professional musicians' orientations to practice: Implications for teaching. British Journal of Music Education, 12, 3–19.
12.
Hamman, D. L., Lucas, K. V., Mc Allister, P., & Teachout, D. (1998). An investigation into the factors contributing to individual practice. Journal of Band Research, 34 (1), 59–68.
13.
Leonard, D., Karnes, E., Oxendine, J. & Hesson, J. (1970). Effects of task difficulty on transfer performance of rotary pursuit. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 30, 731–736.
14.
Owen, J. E. (1988). Improving instrumental practice techniques through the use of motor schema theory of learning. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49(9), A2575.
15.
Pacey, F. (1993). Schema theory and the effect of variable practice in string teaching. British Journal of Music Education, 10, 91–102.
16.
Rhodes, T. C., Bierschenk, D., Lautzenheiser, T., Higgins, J., & Petersen, L. (1993). Essential technique: Intermediate to advanced studies.Milwaukee, WI: Hal Leonard Publishing Corporation.
17.
Rosenthal, R. K. (1984). The relative effects of guided model, model only, guide only, and practice only treatments on the accuracy of advanced instrumentalists' music performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32, 265–273.
18.
Rosenthal, R. K., Wilson, M., Evans, M., & Greenwalt, L. (1988). Effects of different practice conditions on advanced instrumentalists' performance accuracy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 36, 250–257.
19.
Ross, S. L. (1985). The effectiveness of mental practice in improving the performance of college trombonists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 33, 221–230.
20.
Sang, R. C. (1987). A sty of the relationship between instumental music teachers' modeling skills and pupil performance behaviors. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 91, 155–159.
21.
Sitton, M. (1992). The pedagogy of practice. American Music Teacher, 41 (5), 30–33, 89.
22.
Sloboda, J. A., & Howe, M. J. A. (1991). Early lives of musicians, 2: Teachers, practising, and performing. British Journal of Music Education, 8, 53–63.
23.
Wagner, M. J. (1975). The effect of a practice report on practice time and musical performance. In C. Madsen, R. D. Greer, and C. H. Madsen (Eds.), Research in music behavior: Modifying music behavior in the classroom (pp. 125–130). New York: Teachers College Press.
24.
Yarrison, E. (1993, December). Swimming practice applied to music. Flute Talk, 17–18.
25.
Zdzinski, S. F. (1991). Research in motor learning: Applications to instrumental music education. Southeastern Journal of Music Education, 3, 188–205.
26.
Zurcher, W. (1975). The effect of model-supportive practice on beginning brass instrumentalists. In C. Madsen, R. D. Greer, & C. H. Madsen (Eds.), Research in music behavior: Modifying music behavior in the classroom (pp. 131–138). New York: Teachers College Press.
