Based on definitions of coaching, coaches support their clients with their self-determination as well as their self-congruent, self-valued goals; in other words and with regard to Self-Determination Theory (SDT; Deci & Ryan, 2000), coaches support their clients’ autonomy need. In this paper, we present an overview of three research studies on the importance of the autonomy need and its support within coaching. In the first study, we explored the clients’ basic psychological needs within the context of coaching and found that coaching was expected to mainly fulfil the autonomy need. The second study showed that, if a client had a high need for autonomy, this need could be fulfilled by coaching which further increased the client's satisfaction with the coaching. In the third study, we found that the coach's empathy seemed to contribute to supporting clients in their autonomy. We conclude the paper with theoretical and practical implications regarding the importance of autonomy and its support within coaching.
References
1.
BaardP. P., DeciE. L., & RyanR. M. (2004). The relation of intrinsic need satisfaction to performance and well-being in two work settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2045–2068.
2.
BachkirovaT. (2011). Developmental coaching: working with the self. Maidenhead: Open Unversity Press.
3.
BachkirovaT., & SmithC. L. (2015). From competencies to capabilities in the assessment and accreditation of coaches. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 13(2), 123–140. doi: 10.1002/9781118326459.ch8
4.
BachmannT., JansenA. & MäthnerE. (2004). Check-the-Coach. Standardisierter Fragebogen zur Evaluation von Einzel-Coaching-Prozessen. Berlin: artop - Institut an der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
5.
BaronL., & MorinL. (2009). The coach-coachee relationship in executive coaching: A field study. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 20(1), 85–106. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.20009
6.
BarnettG., & MannR. E. (2013). Empathy deficits and sexual offending: A model of obstacles to empathy. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 228–239. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.010
7.
BaumannN. & KuhlJ. (2013). Selbstregulation und Selbstkontrolle [Self-regulation and self-control]. In SargesW. (Eds.), Management-Diagnostik (pp. 263–271). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
8.
BehrendtP. (2004). Wirkfaktoren und Psychodrama im Transfercoaching. Unpublished diploma thesis, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität of Freiburg.
9.
CuffB. M. P., BrownS. J., TaylorL., & HowatD. J. (2016). Empathy: a review of the concept. Emot. Rev., 8, 144–153. doi: 10.1177/1754073914558466
10.
DavisM. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126.
11.
DeciE. D., & RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01
12.
DeciE. D., & RyanR. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. New York: University of Rochester Press.
13.
DeciE. L. & RyanR. M. (2012). Self-determination theory in health care and its relations to motivational interviewing: A few comments. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9(1), 24. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-24
14.
DeciE. L., RyanR. M., GagnéM., LeoneD. R., UsunovJ., & KornazhevaB. P. (2001). Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former Eastern Bloc country. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(8), 930–942. doi: 10.1177/0146167201278002
15.
De HaanC. B., DayA., & SillsC. (2010). Clients’ critical moments of coaching: Toward a “client model” of executive coaching. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(4), 607–621. doi: 10.5465/amle.2010.56659879
GessnitzerS., & KauffeldS. (2015). The working alliance in coaching: Why behavior is the key to success. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 51(2), 177–197. doi: 10.1177/0021886315576407
18.
GessnitzerS., SchulteE.-M. & KauffeldS. (2016). “I am going to succeed”: The power of self-efficient language in coaching and how coaches can use it. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 68(4), 294–312. doi: 10.1037/cpb0000064
19.
GrantA. M., PassmoreJ., CavanaghM., & ParkerH. (2010). The state of play in coaching. International Review of Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 25, 125–168. doi: 10.1002/9780470661628.ch4
20.
GreifS. (2008). Coaching und ergebnisorientierte Selbstreflexion. [Coaching and results-oriented self-reflection.]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
21.
GroverS., & FurnhamA. (2016). Coaching as a developmental intervention in organisations: A systematic review of its effectiveness and the mechanisms underlying it. PLOS ONE, 11(7), 1–41. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159137
22.
HeckhausenH., & HeckhausenJ. (1989). Motivation und Handeln. [Motivation and Action.]. (2nd ed.). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
23.
HossiepR., & PaschenN. (2003). BIP: Bochumer Inventar zur berufsbezogenen Persönlichkeitsbeschreibung. [Bochumer Inventory for job-related personality description.]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
24.
HullC. L. (1943). Principles of behavior: An introduction to behavior theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
25.
IlardiB. C., LeoneD., KasserR., & RyanR. M. (1993). Employee and supervisor ratings of motivation: Main effects and discrepancies associated with job satisfaction and adjustment in a factory setting. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1789–1805. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01066.x
26.
JonasE. (2015). Fairness lohnt sich! Psychologische Facetten von Gerechtigkeit und ihr Beitrag zu Kooperation und Widerstand in sozialen Interaktionen. [Fairness pays off! Psychological facets of justice and its contribution to cooperation and resistance in social interactions.]. In DimitriouM. & SchweigerG. (Eds.), Fairness und Fairplay. Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven (pp. 23–49). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer.
27.
JonasE., & BierhoffH.-W. (2016). Soziale Interdependenz und sozialer Austausch. [Social interdependence and social exchange]. In BierhoffW., FreyD. (Eds.), Kommunikation, Interaktion und Soziale Gruppenprozesse. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
28.
JonasE., MühlbergerC., BöhmA., & EsserV. (2017). Soziale Austausch- und Interdependenzprozesse im Karrieremanagement: Training, Coaching, Mentoring und Supervision in einem sozialpsychologischen Vergleich [Social exchange and interdependency processes in career management: Training, coaching, mentoring and supervision in a social psychological comparison]. In: KauffeldS., SpurkD. (Eds.), Handbuch Laufbahnmanagement und Karriereplanung (pp. 1–35). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
29.
KasserT., DaveyJ., & RyanR. M. (1992). Motivation, dependability, and employee-supervisor discrepancies in psychiatric vocational rehabilitation settings. Rehabilitation Psychology, 37, 175–187. doi: 10.1037/0090-5550.37.3.175
30.
KauffeldS. (2016). Nachhaltige Personalentwicklung und Weiterbildung: Betriebliche Seminare und Trainings entwickeln, Erfolge messen, Transfer sichern [Sustainable personnel development and further training: Developing company seminars and trainings, measuring success, securing transfer] (2nd rev. ed.). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
31.
KelleyH. H., HolmesJ. G., KerrN. L., ReisH. T., RusbultC. E., & Van LangeP. A. M. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
32.
KotteS., HinnD., OellerichK., & MöllerH. (2016). Der Stand der Coachingforschung: Ergebnisse der vorliegenden Metaanalysen [The State of Coaching Research: Results of the present Meta-analyzes]. Organisation, Supervision, Coaching, 23(1), 5–23. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-45119-9_97-1
33.
KuhlJ. (2010). Individuelle Unterschiede in der Selbststeuerung. [Individual Differences in Self-control.]. In: HeckhausenH., HeckhausenJ. (Eds.), Motivation und Handeln [Motivation and Action] (4th ed., pp. 337–363).
34.
La GuardiaJ., RyanR. M., CouchmanC., & DeciE. L. (2000). Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 367–384. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.3.367
35.
LoschS., Traut-MattauschE., MühlbergerM. D., & JonasE. (2016). Comparing the effectiveness of individual coaching, self-coaching, and group training: How leadership makes the difference. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(629), 1–17. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00629
36.
LynchM., PlantR. & RyanR. M. (2005). Psychological needs and a threat to safety: Implications for staff and patients in a psychiatric hospital for youth. Professional Psychology-Research and Practice, 36, 415–425. doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.36.4.415
37.
MarklandD. & HanC. (2012). Autonomy support and empathy among coaches. Unpublished poster. Presented at the North American Society for the Psychology of Sport and Physical Activity (NASPSPA), 7–9 June 2012, Honolulu, Hawaii.
38.
MarklandD., RyanR. M., TobinV. J., & RollnickS. (2005). Motivational interviewing and self-determination theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24 (6), 811–831. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2005.24.6.811
39.
MaslowA. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
40.
McClellandD. C. (1987). Human Motivation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
41.
MühlbergerC., & JonasE. (2016). Need fulfilment in coaching, training, and supervision. Unpublished data. Universität Salzburg.
42.
MurrayH. J. (1938). Explorations in Personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
NeukomM., SchnellK. & BootheB. (2011). Die Arbeitsbeziehung im Coaching - ein Stiefkind der Forschung. [The working relationship in coaching - a stepchild of research.]. Organisationsberatung, Supervision, Coaching, 18(3), 317–332.
44.
PassmoreJ. (2010). A grounded theory study of the coachee experience: The implications for training and practice in coaching psychology. International Coaching Psychology Review, 5, 48–62.
45.
PollakK. I., AlexanderS. C., TulskyJ. A., LynaP., CoffmanC. J., DolorR. J., GulbrandsenP., & OstbyeT. (2011). Physician empathy and listening: associations with patient satisfaction and autonomy. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 24(6), 665–672. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2011.06.110025
46.
RauenC. (2002). HeßTatjana & RothWolfgang L. (2001). Professionelles Coaching. Eine Expertenbefragung zur Qualitätseinschätzung und -entwicklung [Professional coaching. Expert interviews for quality assessment and development]. Organisationsberatung, Supervision, Coaching, 9(3), 295–298. doi: 10.1007/s11613-002-0056-1
RekaldeI., LandetaJ., & AlbizuE. (2015). Determining factors in the effectiveness of executive coaching as a management development tool. Management Decision, 53(8), 1677–1697. doi: 10.1108/md-12-2014-0666
49.
RusbultC. E., MartzJ. M., & AgnewC. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.
50.
RöckeleinC. & WelgeK. (2010). Haltung im Coaching [Attitude in coaching]. Coaching-Magazin, 2, 18–21.
51.
RyanR. M., & DeciE. L. (2004). Autonomy is no illusion: Self-determination theory and the empirical study of authenticity, awareness, and will. In GreenbergJ., KooleS. L., & PyszczynskiT. (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 455–485). New York: Guilford Press.
52.
RyanR. M., & DeciE. L. (2006). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will?Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1557–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00420.x
53.
RyanR. M., & DeciE. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Press.
54.
SchiemannS., MühlbergerC., BraumandlI., & JonasE. (2016). Need fulfillment in Career Coaching. Unpublished data. Universität Salzburg.
55.
SchiemannS., MühlbergerC., BraumandlI., JonasE. (2016). Empathy as an autonomy need support. Unpublished data. Universität Salzburg.
SchülerJ., ShledonK. M., & FröhlichS. M. (2010). Implicit need for achievement moderates the relationship between competence need satisfaction and subsequent motivation. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.09.002
58.
SheldonK. M. (2011). Integrating behavioral-motive and experiential-requirement perspectives on psychological needs: A two-process model. Psychological Review, 118(4), 552–569. doi: 10.1037/a0024758
59.
StorchM. (2004). Resource-activating self-management with the Zurich Resource Model (ZRM). European Psychotherapy, 5(1), 27–64.
60.
TeixeiraP. J., SilvaM. N., MataJ., PalmeiraA. L., & MarklandD. (2012). Motivation, self-determination, and long-term weight control. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9(1), 22. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-22
61.
TheeboomT., BeersmaB., & van VianenA. (2014). Does coaching work? A meta-analysis on the effects of coaching on individual level outcomes in an organizational context. Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2013.837499
62.
ThibautN., & KelleyH. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York, NY: Wiley. doi: 10.2307/3709294
63.
Teding van BerkhoutE. & MalouffJ. M. (2016). The efficacy of empathy training: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 63, 32–41. doi: 10.1037/cou0000093
64.
WegenerR., FritzeA., & LoebbertM. (Eds.) (2014). Coaching-Praxisfelder: Forschung und Praxis im Dialog. [Coaching Practice Fields: Research and Practice in Dialogue.]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer.
65.
WillT., GessnitzerS., & KauffeldS. (2016). You think you are an empathic coach? Maybe you should think again: The difference between perceptions of empathy vs. empathic behaviour after a person-centred coaching training. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 9(1), 53–68. doi: 10.1080/17521882.2016.1143023
66.
WilliamsG. C., FreedmanZ. R., & DeciE. L. (1998). Supporting autonomy to motivate glucose control in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care, 21, 1644–1651. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.10.1644
