This study investigated the relationship between athletes' personality characteristics and the quality of the coach–athlete relationship. 84 female (M age = 20.6 yr., SD = 2.8) and 129 male (M age = 22.0 yr., SD = 3.3) elite youth athletes competing at least for 7 yr. participated in this study. The Five-Factor Personality Inventory (short version) and the Quality of Relationships Inventory were administered to all participants. Stepwise multiple regression analysis assessed which of the five personality factors predicted scores for the different subscales of the Quality of Relationships Inventory (Depth, Support, and Conflict). Results indicated that depth of relationship was not predicted by personality factors. On the other hand, neuroticism and extraversion were significant predictors of support dimension of relationship. Analysis indicated that conscientiousness was the strongest predictor of conflict. In conclusion, athletes' personality characteristics may be important in determining the quality of the coach–athlete relationship.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdieJ. W., & JowettS. (2010) Meta-perceptions of the coach–athlete relationship, achievement goals and intrinsic motivation among sport participants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 2750–2773.
2.
AllenM. S.GreenleesI., & JonesM. V. (2011) An investigation of the five-factor model of personality and coping behavior in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 29, 841–850.
3.
AllenM. S., & LabordeS. J. P. (2014) The role of personality in sport and physical activity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(6), 460–465.
4.
AsendorpfJ. B., & WilpersS. (1998) Personality effects on social relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1531–1544.
5.
BerryD. S., & HansenJ. S. (2000) Personality, nonverbal behavior, and interaction quality in female dyads. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 278–292.
6.
BerryD. S.WillinghamJ. K., & ThayerC. A. (2000) Affect and personality as predictors of conflict and closeness in young adults' friendships. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 84–107.
7.
BussD. M. (1991) Evolutionary personality psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 459–491.
8.
CooperM. L., & SheldonM. S. (2002) Seventy years of research on personality and close relationships: substantive and methodological trends over time. Journal of Personality, 70, 783–812.
9.
CupermanR., & IckesW. (2009) Big Five predictors of behavior and perceptions in initial dyadic interactions: personality similarity helps extraverts and introverts, but hurts “disagreeables.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 667–684.
10.
DavisL., & JowettS. (2014) Coach–athlete attachment and the quality of the coach–athlete relationship: implications for athletes' well-being. Journal of Sports Sciences, 32, 1454–1464.
11.
DonnellanM. B.CongerR. D., & BryantC. M. (2004) The Big Five and enduring marriages. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 481–504.
12.
FeltonL., & JowettS. (2013) Attachment and well-being: the mediating effects of psychological needs satisfaction within coach–athlete and parent–athlete relational contexts. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14, 57–65.
13.
GattisK. S.BernsS.SimpsonL. E., & ChristensenA. (2004) Birds of a feather or strange birds? Ties among personality dimensions, similarity, and marital quality. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 564–574.
14.
HoughL. M. (1992) The “Big Five” personality variables—construct confusion: description versus prediction. Human Performance, 5, 139–155.
15.
JacksonB.DimmockJ. A.GucciardiD. F., & GroveJ. R. (2010) Relationship commitment in athletic dyads: actor and partner effects for Big Five self and other ratings. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 641–648.
16.
JacksonB.DimmockJ. A.GucciardiD. F., & GroveJ. R. (2011) Personality traits and relationship perceptions in coach–athlete dyads: do opposites really attract?Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12, 222–230.
17.
JowettS. (2006) Interpersonal and structural features of Greek coach–athlete dyads performing in individual sports. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 18, 69–81.
18.
JowettS. (2007) Interdependence analysis and the 3Cs +1 in the coach–athlete relationship. In JowettS. & LavalleeD. (Eds.), Social psychology in sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Pp. 15–27.
19.
JowettS. (2009) Validating coach–athlete relationship measures with the nomological network. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 13, 34–51.
20.
JowettS., & ChaundyV. (2004) An investigation into the impact of coach leadership and coach–athlete relationship on group cohesion. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 8, 302–311.
21.
JowettS., & Clark-CarterD. (2006) Perceptions of empathic accuracy and assumed similarity in the coach–athlete relationship. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 617–637.
22.
JowettS., & CockerillI. M. (2002) Incompatibility in the coach–athlete relationship. In CockerillI. M. (Ed.), Solutions in sport psychology. London, UK: Thomson Learning. Pp. 16–31.
23.
JowettS., & CockerillI. M. (2003) Olympic medallists' perspective of the athlete–coach relationship. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 4, 313–331.
24.
JowettS., & CramerD. (2010) The prediction of young athletes' physical self from perceptions of relationships with parents and coaches. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11, 140–147.
25.
JowettS.LafreniereM. K., & VallerandR. J. (2013) Passion for activities and relationship quality: a dyadic approach. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(6), 734–749.
26.
JowettS., & NtoumanisN. (2004) The Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART–Q): development and initial validation. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 14, 245–257.
27.
JowettS., & PoczwardowskiA. (2007) Understanding the coach-athlete relationship. In JowettS. & LavalleeD. (Eds.), Social psychology in sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Pp. 3–14.
28.
KarneyB. R., & BradburyT. N. (1995) The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: a review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34.
29.
KellyE. L., & ConleyJ. J. (1987) Personality and compatibility: a prospective analysis of marital stability and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 27–40.
30.
LafreniereM. K.JowettS.VallerandR. J., & CarbonneauN. (2011) Passion for coaching and the quality of the coach–athlete relationship: the mediating role of coaching behaviors. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12, 144–152.
31.
LeungS., & BondM. H. (2001) Interpersonal communication and personality: self and other perspectives. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 4, 69–86.
32.
MalouffJ. M.ThorsteinssonE. B.SchutteN. S.BhullarN., & RookeS. E. (2010) The five-factor model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: a meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 124–127.
33.
McCraeR. R. (1996) Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 323–337.
34.
NoftleE. E., & ShaverP. R. (2006) Attachment dimensions and Big Five personality traits: associations and comparative ability to predict relationship quality. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 179–208.
35.
OlympiouA.JowettS., & DudaJ. L. (2008) The psychological interface between the coach-created motivational climate and the coach-athlete relationship in team sports. The Sport Psychologist, 22, 423–438.
36.
OrganD. W., & RyanM. (1995) A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48, 775–802.
37.
ÖzabaciN. (2011) The Turkish adaptation of the Relationship Quality Scale: a validity and reliability study. Education and Science, 36, 159–167.
38.
PierceG.SarasonI. G.SarasonB. R.Solky-ButzelJ. A., & NagleL. C. (1997) Assessing the quality of personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 339–356.
39.
PoczwardowskiA.BarottJ. E., & HenschenK. P. (2003) The athlete and coach: their relationship and its meaning. Results of an interpretive study. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 33, 116–140.
40.
ReinerI.BeutelM.SkaletzC.BrahlerE., & Stöbel-RichterY. (2012) Validating the German version of the Quality of Relationship Inventory: confirming the three-factor structure and report of psychometric properties. PLOS One, 7(5), 1–6.
41.
RhindD. J. A., & JowettS. (2010) Relationship maintenance strategies in the coach–athlete relationship: the development of the COMPASS model. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 22, 106–121.
42.
ShadishW. R. (1986) The validity of a measure of intimate behavior. Small Group Behavior, 17, 113–120.
43.
SomerO.KorkmazM., & TatarA. (2002) Beş Faktör Kişilik Envanterinin geliştirilmesi-1: Ölçek ve alt ölçeklerin oluşturulması [Development of Five Factor Personality Inventory]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 17, 21–37.
44.
SomerO.KorkmazM., & TatarA. (2004) Kuramdan Uygulamaya Beş Faktör Kişilik Modeli ve Beş Faktör Kişilik Envanteri [From theory to practice: five factor personality model and Five-Factor Personality Inventory]. İzmir, Turkey: Ege Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi Yayınları, No: 128.
45.
WhiteJ. K.HendrickS. S., & HendrickC. (2004) Big Five personality variables and relationship constructs. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1519–1530.
46.
WyllemanP. (2000) Interpersonal relationships in sport: uncharted territory in sport psychology research. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 31, 555–572.
47.
YangS. X.JowettS., & ChanD. K. C. (2015) Effects of Big-Five personality traits on the quality of relationship and satisfaction in Chinese coach-athlete dyads. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 25, 568–580.
