Theorists posit that the social reinforcement of racially oppressive assumptions eventually works its way into the psyche of African Americans and negatively shapes the way they see themselves and others within their race. Some scholars have attempted to prove and others have subsequently disputed the idea that school achievement within African American peer groups is seen as “acting White.” In this study, internalized racism and Fordham and Ogbu's (1986) Acting White Hypothesis were explored among high-achieving African American male undergraduates at six predominantly White universities. Findings from individual interviews contradict the hypothesis and reveal ways through which peer support for leadership and achievement were negotiated within African American peer groups on the six campuses. There was no evidence of internalized racism in the domains of academic achievement and African American male leadership. Instead, the participants attributed much of their college success to the support offered by their same-race peers.
Ainsworth-DarnellJ. W., & DowneyD. B. (1998). Assessing the oppositional culture explanation for racial/ethnic differences in school performance. American Sociological Review, 63(4), 536–553.
2.
AstinA. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
BaldwinA. Y. (1991). Gifted Black adolescents: Beyond racism to pride. In BireleyM. & GenshaftJ. (Eds.), Understanding the gifted adolescent: Educational, developmental and multicultural issues (pp. 231–239). New York: Teachers College Press.
4.
BakerD. G. (1983). Race, ethnicity and power: A comparative study. Boston: Routledge.
5.
BonnerF. A.II (2001). Gifted African American male college students: A phenomenological study. Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
6.
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (2000). The Carnegie classification of institutions of higher education. Stanford, CA: Author.
7.
CookP. J., & LudwigJ. (1998). The burden of “acting White”: Do Black adolescents disparage academic achievement? In JencksC. & PhillipsM. (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 375–400). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
8.
CooleyM. R.CornellD. G., & LeeC. (1991). Peer acceptance and self-concept of Black students in a summer gifted program. Journal for Education of the Gifted, 14, 166–177.
9.
DavisJ. E. (1994). College in black and white: Campus environment and academic achievement of African American males. Journal of Negro Education, 63(4), 620–633.
10.
DavisJ. E. (1999). What does gender have to do with the experiences of African American college men? In PoliteV. C. & DavisJ. E. (Eds.), African American males in school and society: Practices and policies for effective education (pp. 134–148). New York: Teachers College Press.
11.
DavisJ. E. (2001). Black boys at school: Negotiating masculinities and race. In MajorsR. (Ed.), Educating our Black children: New directions and radical approaches (pp. 169–182). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
12.
DavisJ. E. (2003). Early schooling and academic achievement of African American males. Urban Education, 38(5), 515–533.
13.
DenzinN., & LincolnY. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In DenzinN. & LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1–28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
FergusonR. F. (2001). A diagnostic analysis of Black-White GPA disparities in Shaker Heights, Ohio. Brookings Papers on Education Policy, 2001, 347–414.
16.
FordD. Y. (1996). Reversing underachievement among gifted Black students: Promising practices and programs. New York: Teachers College Press.
17.
FordD. Y., & HarrisJ. J.III (1995). Underachievement among gifted African American students: Implications for school counselors. School Counselor, 42(3), 196–203.
18.
FordD. Y., & HarrisJ. J.III (1997). A study of the racial identity and achievement of Black males and females. Roeper Review, 20(2), 105–110.
19.
FordhamS. (1988). Racelessness as a strategy in Black students' school success: Pragmatic strategy or pyrrhic victory?Harvard Educational Review, 58(1), 54–84.
20.
FordhamS., & OgbuJ. U. (1986). Black students' school success: Coping with the “burden of ‘acting White.’”Urban Review, 18(3), 176–206.
21.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
22.
Fries-BrittS. L. (1997). Identifying and supporting gifted African American men. In CuyjetM. J. (Ed.), Helping African American men succeed in college. New directions for student services (No. 80, pp. 65–78). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23.
Fries-BrittS. L. (1998). Moving beyond Black achiever isolation: Experiences of gifted Black collegians. Journal of Higher Education, 69(5), 556–576.
24.
Fries-BrittS. L. (2002). High-achieving Black collegians. About Campus, 7(3), 2–8.
25.
Fries-BrittS. L. (2004). The challenges and needs of high-achieving Black college students. In BrownM. C.II & FreemanK. (Eds.), Black colleges: New perspectives on policy and practice (pp. 161–176). Westport, CT: Praeger.
26.
Fries-BrittS. L., & TurnerB. (2001). Facing stereotypes: A case study of Black students on a White campus. Journal of College Student Development, 42(5), 420–429.
27.
Fries-BrittS. L., & TurnerB. (2002). Uneven stories: Successful Black collegians at a Black and a White campus. The Review of Higher Education, 25(3), 315–330.
28.
GayG. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.
29.
GranthamT. C., & FordD. Y. (2003). Beyond self-concept and self-esteem: Racial identity and gifted African American students. The High School Journal, 87(1), 18–29.
30.
GriffinK. (2007). Striving for success: A qualitative exploration of competing theories of high-achieving Black college students' academic motivation. Journal of College Student Development, 47(4), 384–400.
31.
HarperS. R. (2004). The measure of a man: Conceptualizations of masculinity among high-achieving African American male college students. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 48(1), 89–107.
32.
HarperS. R. (2005a). Leading the way: Inside the experiences of high-achieving African American male students. About Campus, 10(1), 8–15.
33.
HarperS. R. (2005b, November). High-achieving African American men's behavioral responses to stereotypes at predominantly White universities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Philadelphia, PA.
34.
HarperS. R. (2007a). Black male students at public flagship universities in the U.S.: Status, trends, and implications for policy and practice. Washington, DC: Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies.
35.
HarperS. R. (2007b). Enhancing African American male student outcomes through leadership and active involvement. In CuyjetM. J. (Ed.), African American men in college (pp. 68–94). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36.
HarperS. R.HarrisF.III, & MmejeK. C. (2005). A theoretical model to explain the overrepresentation of college men among campus judicial offenders: Implications for campus administrators. NASPA Journal, 42(4), 565–588.
37.
CollinsHill P. (2004). Black sexual politics: African Americans, gender, and the new racism. New York: Routledge.
38.
HollinsE. R., & SpencerK. (1990). Restructuring schools for cultural inclusion: Changing the schooling process for African American youngsters. Journal of Education, 172, 89–100.
39.
HolsteinJ. A., & GubriumJ. F. (1995). The active interview. Qualitative research method series (No. 37). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
HooksB. (2004). We real cool: Black men and masculinity. New York: Routledge.
41.
HorvatE. M., & LewisK. S. (2003). Reassessing the “burden of ‘acting White’”: The importance of peer groups in managing academic success. Sociology of Education, 76(4), 265–280.
42.
IrvineJ. J. (1990). Black students and school failure. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
43.
JonesC. P. (2000). Levels of racism: A theoretical framework and a gardener's tale. American Journal of Public Health, 90(8), 1212–1215.
44.
KunjufuJ. (1988). To be popular or smart: The Black peer group. Chicago: African American Images.
45.
Ladson-BillingsG. J. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Education Research Journal, 35, 465–491.
46.
LindstromR. R., & Van SantS. (1986). Special issues in working with gifted minority adolescents. Journal of Counseling and Development, 64, 583–586.
47.
LipskyS. (1987). Internalized racism. Seattle: Rational Island Publishers.
48.
MilesM. B., & HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
MoustakasC. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2005). Integrated postsecondary education data system. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
51.
OgbuJ. U. (2004). Collective identity and the burden of “acting White” in Black history, community, and education. The Urban Review, 36(1), 1–35.
52.
OgbuJ. U., & SimonsH. D. (1998). Voluntary and involuntary minorities: A cultural-ecological theory of school performance with some implications for education. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 29(2), 155–188.
53.
PhetersonG. (1990). Alliances between women: Overcoming internalized oppression and internalized domination. In AlbrechtL. & BrewerR. (Eds.), Bridges of power: Women's multicultural alliances (pp. 34–48). Philadelphia, PA: New Society.
54.
PolkinghorneD. E. (1989). Phenomenological research methods. In ValleR. S. & HallingS. (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology (pp. 41–60). New York: Plenum.
55.
PykeK., & DangT. (2003). “FOB” and “Whitewashed”: Identity and internalized racism among second generation Asian Americans. Qualitative Sociology, 26(2), 147–172.
56.
SpencerM. B.NollE.StolzfusJ., & HarpalaniV. (2001). Identity and school adjustment: Revisiting the “acting White” assumption. Educational Psychologist, 36(1), 21–30.
57.
WestK. (2004). The college dropout [CD]. New York: Roc-a-Fella Records.
