In this paper, first we investigate some properties of L-ordered groups such as L-subgroup generated by an arbitrary subset and product of L-ordered groups. Then we introduce the notions of totally L-ordered group and strong totally L-ordered group, where L is a frame and some related results are obtained. We show that the set of all isomorphisms on a totally L-subgroup, forms an L-ordered group. Moreover, if it is a strong totally L-ordered group, then the set of all isomorphisms on it is an L-lattice ordered group.
Zhang and Liu defined a kind of an L-frame by a pair (A ; iA), where A is a classical frame and iA : L→A is a frame morphism. For a stratified L-topological space (X ; δ), the pair (δ ; iX) is one of this kind of L-frames, where iX : L→δ, is a map which sends a ∈ L to the constant map with the value a. Conversely, a point of an L-frame (A ; iA) is a frame morphism p : (A ; iA) → (L ; idL) satisfying p ∘ iA = idL and Lpt (A) denotes the set of all points of (A ; iA). Then {Φx : Lpt (A) →L| ∀ p ∈ Lpt (A) ; Φx (p) = p (x)} is a stratified L-topology on Lpt (A). By these two assignments, Zhang and Liu constructed an adjunction between SL - Top and L - Loc and consequently they established the Stone representation theorem for distributive lattices by means of this adjunction. They pointed out that, from the viewpoint of lattice theory, Rodabaugh’s fuzzy version of the Stone representation theory is just one and it has nothing different from the classical one. While in our opinion, Zhang-Liu’s L-frames preserve many features and also seem to have no strong difference from a crisp one. Recently, based on complete Heyting algebras, Fan and Zhang [4, 13], studied quantitative domains through fuzzy set theory. Their approach first defines a fuzzy partial order, specifically a degree function, on a non-empty set. Yao introduced the notion of L-frames. It is a complete L-ordered set with the meet operation having a right fuzzy adjoint. They established an adjunction between the category of stratified L-topological spaces and the category of L-locales, the opposite category of this kind of L-frames. In the follows, Borzooei et al., in [3] introduced the notions of L-ordered group, convex L-subgroup and quotient L-ordered group.
This paper are organized as follows. In Section 2, we recall some notions and results about L-ordered sets and L-ordered groups. In Section 3, we give some properties of L-ordered group and introduce two products in L-ordered groups. In Section 4, we introduce the notions of totally L- ordered group and strong totally L-ordered group and we state and prove some related results.
Preliminary
A frame is a complete lattice L satisfying the following infinite distributive law:
Let L be a frame and for any a, b ∈ L, a→b is defined by a→b = ⋁ {c ∈ L|a ∧ c ≤ b}. Then for any x, y, z ∈ L and Y ⊂ L, the following conditions hold:
(x ∧ y) →z = x→ (y→z),
x → ( ⋀ y∈Yy) = ⋀ y∈Y (x→y),
( ⋁ y∈Yy) → z = ⋀ y∈Y (y→z).
From now on, in this paper, we let L is a frame.
Let P be a set and e : P × P→L be a map. The pair (P, e) is called an L-ordered set if for all x, y, z ∈ P, (E1): e (x, x) =1,(E2): e (x, y) ∧ e (y, z) ≤ e (x, z), (E3): e (x, y) = e (y, x) =1 implies x = y. In an L-ordered set (P, e), the map e is called an L-order relation on P. If (P, ≤) is a poset, then (P, χ≤) is an L-ordered set, where χ≤ is the characteristic function of ≤. Moreover, for each L-ordered set (P, e), the set ≤e = {(x, y) ∈ P × P|e (x, y) =1} is a partial order on P and so (P, ≤ e) is a poset. We denote LP the set of all L-subsets of P, that is LP = {f|f : P→L}. A map f : (P, eP) → (Q, eQ) between two L-ordered sets is called monotone if for all x, y ∈ P, eP (x, y) ≤ eQ (f (x) , f (y)). Let (P, e) be an L-ordered set and S be an L-subset of P. Then support S is defined by the set supp (S) = {x ∈ P| 0 < S (x)}. Let (P, e) be an L-ordered set and S ∈ LP. An element x0 ∈ P is called a join (meet) of S, in symbol x0 = ⊔ S (x0 = ⊓ S), if for all x ∈ P, (J1): S (x) ≤ e (x ; x0) ((M1): S (x) ≤ e (x0 ; x)), (J2): ⋀ y∈P (S (y) →e (y, x)) ≤ e (x0, x)((M2): ⋀ y∈P (S (y) →e (x, y)) ≤ e (x, x0))(See [12, 13]). If a join and a meet of S exist, then they are unique.
Theorem 2.1. [13] Let (P, e) be anL-ordered set andS ∈ LP. Then
x0 = ⊔ Sif and only ife (x0, x) = ⋀ y∈P (S (y) →e (y, x)),
x0 = ⊓ Sif and only ife (x ; x0) = ⋀ y∈P (S (y) →e (x, y)).
An L-ordered set (P, e) is called an L-lattice if for all x, y ∈ P, ⊔χ{x,y} and ⊓χ{x,y} exist.
Proposition 2.2. [3] Let (P, e) be anL-lattice. Then the following conditions hold for allx, y, a ∈ P:
(P, ≤) is a lattice,
e (a, x ∧ y) = e (a, x) ∧ e (a, y),
e (x ∨ y, a) = e (x, a) ∧ e (y, a).
Corollary 2.3. [3] AnL-ordered set (P, e) is anL-lattice if and only if (P, ≤ e) is a lattice such thate (a, x ∧ y) = e (a, x) ∧ e (a, y) ande (x ∨ y, a) = e (x, a) ∧ e (y, a), for allx, y, a ∈ P.
An L-fuzzy ordered group (or L-ordered group, for short) is a group (G ; . , 1) together with an L-order relation e : G × G→L on G such that each translation maps () . a : G→G and a . () : G→G are monotone, or equivalently (FOG): e (x, y) ≤ e (b . x . a, b . y . a), for each x, y, a, b ∈ G. We use (G, e) to denote an L-ordered group G. An L-ordered group (G, e) is called an L-lattice ordered group, if (G, e) is an L-lattice (See [3]).
Corollary 2.4.If (G, e) is anL-ordered group, then (G, ≤ e) is an ordered group.
Converse of this corollary is not hold in general. We show this by an example.
Example 2.5. Let L = {0, a, 1} be a chain and consider that e is an L-order relation defined by:
Obviously is an L-ordered set and is an ordered group, but is not an L-ordered group.
Let (G, e) be an L-ordered group, a ∈ G and S ∈ LG. We define a ∧ S by (a ∧ S) (y) = ∨ {S (x) |x ∈ G, a ∧ x = y}. a ∨ S and a . S is define similarly (See [3]).
Proposition 2.6. [3] Let (G, e) be anL-ordered group. Then the following conditions hold, for allx, y, a, b ∈ G:
For eachx, y, a, b ∈ G, e (x, y) = e (b . x . a, b . y . a),
For eachx, y ∈ G, e (x, y) = e (y-1, x-1),
Ifx, y, a ∈ Gsuch thatx ≤ y, thene (y, a) ≤ e (x, a) ande (a, x) ≤ e (a, y),
a . ⊔ S = ⊔ (a . S), a . ⊓ S = ⊓ (a . S) and (⊔ S) -1= ⊓ S-1.
Let (G, e) be an L-ordered group. By an L-subgroup of (G, e) we mean an element S ∈ LG such that S (x) ∧ S (y) ≤ S (x . y), for all x, y ∈ G and S (x) = S (x-1), for all x ∈ G. An L-subgroup S of (G, e) is callednormal if S (y) ≤ S (x . y . x-1), for all x, y ∈ G. Clearly, if S is normal, then S (y) = S (x . y . x-1), for all x, y ∈ G. Moreover, if S1, ⋯ , Sn ∈ LG, then S1 . ⋯ . Sn define by (S1 . ⋯ . Sn) (y) = ∨ {S (x1) ∧ S (x2) ∧ ⋯ ∧ S (xn) |x1 . ⋯ . xn = y}, for all y ∈ G. A non-empty subset A of an ordered set X is said to be convex if for x, y ∈ A and z ∈ X, x ≤ z ≤ y implies z ∈ A. A subset A of lattice L is said to be filter if for any x, y ∈ L, x, y ∈ A implies x ∧ y ∈ A and x ∈ A and y ≥ x implies y ∈ A. A filter F of a Boolean algebra B is an ultrafilter if F is maximal with respect to the property that 0 ∉ F. For any set I, an ultrafilter of P (I) (powerset of I) is called an ultrafilter over I. Let {Ai} i∈I be a family of algebras of a given type, and let U be an ultrafilter over I. Define θU on by (a, b) ∈ θU if and only if {i ∈ I|f (i) = g (i)} ∈ U. Let {Ai} i∈I and U be an ultrafilter over I; we define the ultraproduct to be . The elements of are denoted by a/U; where . Let (G, e) be an L-ordered group and S ∈ LG. By a positive cone of S, we mean a map S+ : G→L defined by S+ (x) = S (x) ∧ e (1G, x) for all x ∈ G. The positive cone of G is the positive cone of the map SG : G→L sending each element x ∈ G to e (1G, x). So, for each x ∈ G, (SG) + (x) = e (1G, x) ∧ e (1G, x) = e (1G, x) (See [3]).
Theorem 2.7. [3] LetSbe the positive cone of (G, e). ThenShas the following properties, for allx, y ∈ G:
S (x) ∧ S (y) ≤ S (x . y),
S (x) = S (x-1) =1 implies that x = 1G,
S (1G) =1, and S (x . y . x-1) = S (y),
S is convex.
Some properties of L-ordered groups
In this section, we give some properties of L-ordered groups, such as generated L-subgroup of an L-ordered group and distributivity in L-ordered groups. Then we introduce two products in L-ordered groups. Finally, we show that ultraproduct of L-ordered groups where L is finite chain is an L-ordered group.
Lemma 3.1.Let (G, e) be anL-ordered group and {Si} i∈Ibe a family ofL-subgroups of (G, e). Then ⋀i∈ISiis anL-subgroup of (G, e) where ( ⋀ i∈ISi) (x) = ⋀ i∈ISi (x), forx ∈ G.
Proof. For any x, y ∈ G, ( ⋀ i∈ISi) (x-1) = ⋀ i∈ISi (x-1) allowbreak = ⋀ i∈ISi (x) = ( ⋀ i∈ISi) (x). Moreover, ( ⋀ i∈ISi) (x) ∧ ( ⋀ i∈ISi)(y) = ( ⋀ i∈I (Si (x) ∧ Si (y)) ≤ ⋀ i∈ISi (x . y) = ( ⋀ i∈ISi) (x . y). Hence ⋀i∈ISi is an L-subgroup of G.□
Proposition 3.2.Let (G, e) be anL-ordered group,Sbe anL-subset of (G, e) and 〈S〉 be theL-subgroup generated byS, the smallestL-subgroup of (G, e) that containsS. Then
Proof. By Lemma 3.1, the proof is obvious.□
Example 3.3. Let L = {0, a, 1} be a chain and be an L-ordered group, where is defined by:
Let S ∈ LG where S (2) = a and S (x) =0 for all x ≠ 2. Then for any
In the next theorem, we determine L-subgroup generated by S ∈ LG.
Theorem 3.4.Let (G, e) be anL-ordered group andS ∈ LG. Then
Proof. It is obvious that 〈S〉 (x) = 〈S〉 (x-1), for any x ∈ G. Now for any x, y ∈ G, we have
Moreover, for any x ∈ G
So 〈S〉 contain S. Let S′ ∈ LG be an L-subgroup of G where S (x) ≤ S′ (x) for any x ∈ G. Then
Hence 〈S〉 (x) ≤ S′ (x) for any x ∈ G and so 〈S〉 is the smallest L-subgroup of (G, e) that containing S.□
Corollary 3.5.Let (G, e) be anL-ordered group,S ∈ LGandsupp (S) = {a}. Then 〈S〉 (x) = S (a) if and only ifx = na, for some .
Theorem 3.6.Let (G, e) be anL-lattice ordered group,S ∈ LGsuch that ⊔Sexists and ⋁y∈GS (y) =1. Thena ∧ ⊔ S = ⊔ (a ∧ S), for alla ∈ G.
Proof. Let u = ⊔ S. Then for all x ∈ G, e (u, x) = ⋀ y∈G (S (y) →e (y, x)). Define T : G→L by T (y) = (a ∧ u) . (a ∧ S) -1 (y), for all y ∈ G. From Proposition 2.6,
Hence, It is enough to show that ⋀y∈G (T (y) →e (x, y)) ≤ e (x, 1) and T (x) ≤ e (1, x), for all x ∈ G. For each y ∈ G, we have
Let v ∈ G. Since ⊔S = u, for all y ∈ G, S (y) ≤ e (y, u) and so for each y ∈ {z ∈ G| v = (a ∧ u) (a ∧ z) -1},
Now, we show that ⋀y∈G (T (y) →e (x, y)) ≤ e (x, 1).
For all x ∈ G,
Moreover, for all x ∈ G,
Put x ∈ G. For all z ∈ G,
which implies that ⋀ z∈G (S (y) →e (x (a ∧ z) , a ∧ u)) ≤ ⋀ z∈G (S (y) →e (x, uz-1)) = e (x, 1). Therefore, ⊓T = 1 and so a ∧ ⊔ S = ⊔ (a ∧ S).□
Theorem 3.7.Let (G, e) be anL-lattice ordered group,S ∈ LGsuch that ⊓Sexists and ⋁y∈GS (y) =1. Thena ∨ ⊓ S = ⊓ (a ∨ S), for alla ∈ G.
Proof. The proof is similar to the proof ofTheorem 3.6.□
Definition 3.8. Let (P, e) be an L-ordered set. An element α ∈ L is called e-strong if for each x, y ∈ P, α ≤ e (x, y) implies that x ≤ y.
Clearly, if (P, e) is an L-ordered set, then the greatest element of L that is 1, is an e-strong element. Moreover, if t ∈ L is an e-strong element and t ≤ e (x, y) ∧ e (y, x), then x = y.
In the next theorem, we define two kind of products of L-ordered groups and then we show that they are L-ordered groups, too.
Theorem 3.9.Let (G1, e1) and (G2, e2) be twoL-ordered groups. Then, for anyx1, x2 ∈ G1andx2, y2 ∈ G2;
(E2):
(E3): Let (e1 ∧ e2) ((x1, y1) , (x2, y2) = (e1 ∧ e2) ((x2, allowbreaky2) , (x1, y1)) = (1, 1). Then (e1 (x1, x2) , e2 (y1, y2)) allowbreak = (1, 1) and (e1 (x2, x1) , e2 (y2, y1)) = (1, 1). So e(x1, x2) = e1 (x2, x1) =1 and so we have x1 = x2. By the similar way we can show that y1 = y2. Therefore, (x1, y1) = (x2, y2). Hence G1 × G2, e1 × e2) is an L × L-ordered set.
Also, for any (x1, y1) , (x2, y2) , (a1, a2) , (b1, b2) ∈ G1 × G2, we have
Therefore, (G1 × G2, e1 × e2) is an L × L-ordered group.□
Example 3.10. Let be an L-ordered group where e is the characteristic function of ≤ on and L = {0, 1}. Then is an L-ordered group that (e ∧ e) ((x1, y1) , (x2, y2)) =1 if and only if e (x1, x2) =1 and e (y1, y2) =1. Also is an L × L-ordered group that e ∧ e is define as below:
Theorem 3.11.Let {(Gi, ei)} i∈Ibe a family ofL-ordered groups whereLbe a finite chain. Then the ultraproduct of this family is anL-ordered group.
Proof. Let U be an ultra filter of the power set of I. Define the relation θ on G = Πi∈IGi by (f, g) ∈ θ ⇔ {i ∈ I|f (i) = g (i)} ∈ U. By [5, Example 1.3.29], we know that θ is a group congruence on G. Set G/U = {[f] | f ∈ G}, where [f] = {g ∈ G| (f, g) ∈ θ}. Define e : G × G→L, by e (f, g) = ⋀ i∈Iei (f (i) , g (i)). Similar to the proof of Theorem 3.9(i), it can be easily shown that (G, e) is an L-ordered group. For each f, g ∈ G, let be defined by ⋁α∈[1]e (α, gf-1). We claim that is an L-ordered group on G/U. Clearly (E1) holds. Let f, g, h ∈ G. Then
Let α, β ∈ [1]. Then A = {i ∈ I| f (i) =1} ∈ U, B = {j ∈ I| g (j) =1} ∈ U, and A ∩ B ∈ U (since U is a filter). Moreover, A ∩ B ⊆ {i ∈ I| βα (i) =1} and so by the assumption {i ∈ I| βα (i) =1} ∈ U, which implies that αβ ∈ [1]. It follows that [1] = {αβ| α, β ∈ [1]}. Hence
and so (E3) hold. Now, let f, g ∈ G such that . Then ⋁α∈[1]e (α, gf-1) allowbreak = ⋁ α∈[1]e (α, fg-1) =1. Since L is a finite chain, there are α, β ∈ [1] such that e (α, gf-1) = e (β, fg-1) =1. Since α, β ∈ [1], we get A = {i ∈ I| α (i) =1} ∈ U and B = {i ∈ I| β (i) =1} ∈ U and so A ∩ B ∈ U (note that A∩ B ≠ ∅). For each i ∈ A ∩ B, we have 1 = ei (α (i) , gf-1 (i)) = ei (1, g (i) f (i) -1) = ei (f (i) , g (i)). In a similar way, we can see that 1 = ei (g (i) , f (i)), for all i ∈ I. Hence f (i) = g (i), for each i ∈ A ∩ B and then A ∩ B ⊆ {i ∈ I| f (i) = g (i)}. Since A ∩ B ∈ U and U is a filter, {i ∈ I| f (i) = g (i)} ∈ U. Thus [f] = [g]. From definition of , it is clear that, . Therefore, is an L-ordered group.□
Theorem 3.12.Let (G, e) be anL-ordered group,S ∈ LGsuch thatsupp (S) = {a1, a2, . . . , an} and ⊔Sexists. Thenis ane-strong element.
Proof. Suppose that x, y ∈ G such that and ⊔S = b, for some b ∈ G. Then for all x ∈ G, . For all i ∈ {1, 2, . . . , n}, we have
Hence S (ai) →e (ai, b . x-1 . y) =1 and so . Therefore, is an e-strong element.□
Corollary 3.13.Let (G, e) be anL-ordered group,S ∈ LGsuch thatsupp (S) = {a} and ⊔Sexists. ThenS (a) is ane-strong element.
In the following proposition, we want to get the converse of Corollary 3.13.
Proposition 3.14.LetLbe a chain, (G, e) be anL-ordered group,α ∈ Lbee-strong andS : G→Ldefine byS (a) = αandS (x) =0, for allx ∈ G - {a}. Then ⊔Sexists and is equal toa.
Proof. It is enough to show that α→e (a, x) = e (a, x), for all x ∈ G. Let x ∈ G. If e (a, x) ≥ α, then by the assumption a ≤ x and so e (a, x) =1. Moreover, α→e (a, x) =1. Hence α→e (a, x) =1 = e (a, x). If e (a, x) < α, then α→e (a, x) = ∨ {u ∈ L| α ∧ u ≤ e (a, x)} = e (a, x). Therefore, α→e (a, x) = e (a, x), for all x ∈ G and so by Theorem 2.1, ⊔S = a.□
Totally L-ordered group
In this section, we introduce the concept of totally L-ordered groups and study some of their properties.
Definition 4.1. Let (G, e) and (G′, e′) be two L-ordered groups. The map f : (G, e) → (G′, e′) is called an L-ordered group morphism (or L-morphism) if f is both a group homomorphism and a monotone map, that is for any x, y ∈ G, f (x . y) = f (x) . f (y), f (x-1) = (f (x)) -1 and e (f (x) , f (y)) ≥ e (x, y). The map f is called an L-ordered group isomorphism (or L-isomorphism) if there exists an L-morphism g : (G′, e′) → (G, e) such that f ∘ g = IdG′ and g ∘ f = IdG.
Remark 4.2. Let (G, e) and (G′, e′) be two L-ordered groups. Suppose that f : (G, e) → (G′, e′) is an L-isomorphism. Then there exist an L-morphism g : (G′, e′) → (G, e) such that g ∘ f = IdG and so for all x, y ∈ G, we have
Therefore e (x, y) = e (f (x) , f (y)), for all x, y ∈ G. Moreover, if f : (G, e) → (G′, e′) is an L-morphism such that f is one to one, onto and e (f (x) , f (y)) = e (x, y), for all x, y ∈ G, then f-1 : G′ → G is an L-isomorphism, too. In fact, for each x, y ∈ G, e (f-1 (x) , f-1 (y)) = e (f ∘ f-1 (x) , f ∘ f-1 (y)) = e (x, y).
Definition 4.3. Let (T, e) be an L-ordered group. We called (T, e) is a totally L-ordered group if for any x, y ∈ T, e (x, y) ∨ e (y, x) =1.
Example 4.4. Let L′ = {0, 1} be a lattice, L = L′ × L′ and be an L-ordered group such that is defined by:
Then is a totally L-ordered group. But it is not an L-lattice ordered group, because (Z, ≤ e) is not a lattice. In fact, x ≤ ey if and only if x = y and join and meet is not exist.
Proposition 4.5.Every totallyL-ordered group (T, e) that range ofeis a chain, is anL-lattice ordered group.
Proof. For any x, y ∈ G, e (x, y) ∨ e (y, x) =1. Range of e is a chain, so e (x, y) =1 or e (y, x) =1. So (T, ≤ e) is a totally ordered group and so (T, ≤ e) is a lattice ordered group. Therefore (T, e) is an L-lattice ordered group.□
Proposition 4.6.Let (T, e) be anL-ordered group. Then (T, e) is a totallyL-ordered group if and only if for anyx ∈ T, e (x, 1T) ∨ e (1T, x) =1.
Proof. It is obvious that if (T, e) is a totally L-ordered group, then for any x ∈ T, e (x, 1T) ∨ e (1T, x) =1. Conversely, let for any x ∈ T, e (x, 1T) ∨ e (1T, x) =1 and a, b ∈ T. Then e (a . b-1, 1T) ∨ e (1T, a . b-1) =1 and so by Proposition 2.6, e (a, b) ∨ e (b, a) =1.□
Corollary 4.7.Let (T, e) be anL-ordered group andT = 〈χ{a}〉 fora ∈ T. ThenTis a totallyL-ordered group if and only ife (1T, a) ∨ e (a, 1T) =1.
Proof. By Proposition 4.2, it is obvious that if (T, e) is a totally L-ordered group, then e (1T, a) ∨ e (a, 1T) =1. Now, let e (1T, a) ∨ e (a, 1T) =1. By Corollary 3.5, for any x, y ∈ T, there exists such that y - x = na. Hence
Therefore, (T, e) is a totally L-ordered group.□
Theorem 4.8.Let (T, e1) and (H, e2) be two totallyL-ordered groups ande : (T × H) × (T × H) →Lis defined bye ((x, y) , (x′, y′)) = e1 (x, x′) ∧ e2 (y, y′). Then (T × H, e) is a totallyL-ordered group if and only if for anya ∈ Im (e1) andb ∈ Im (e2), a ∨ b = 1.
Proof. Let (T × H, e) be a totally L-ordered group, a ∈ Im (e1) and b ∈ Im (e2). Then there exist x, x′ ∈ T and y, y′ ∈ H such that a = e1 (x, x′) and b = e2 (y′, y). Since (T × H, e) is a totally L-ordered group, we have
and so a ∨ b = 1.
Conversely, if for any a ∈ Im (e1) and b ∈ Im (e2), a ∨ b = 1, then for any x, x′ ∈ T and y, y′ ∈ H
Hence (T × H, e) is a totally L-ordered group.□
Definition 4.9. Let (T, e) be an L-ordered group. We called (T, e) is a strong totally L-ordered group if for any x, y ∈ T, e (x, y) =1 or e (y, x) =1.
Example 4.10. (i) Let L = {0, a, 1} be a frame and be an L-ordered group such that is defined by:
Then is a strong totally L-ordered group. Clearly (E1), (E3) and (FOG) hold. For any , if x < x″ or x = x″ and y ≤ y″ then e ((x, y) , (x″, y″)) =1 and e ((x, y) , (x′, y′)) ∧ e ((x′, y′) , (x″, y″)) ≤ e ((x, y) , (x″, y″)), if x = x″ and y″ < y, then e ((x, y) , (x″, y″)) = a, if e ((x, y) , (x′, y′)) ∧ e ((x′, y′) , (x″, y″)) =1, then x ≤ x′ and x′ ≤ x″ and so x = x′ = x″. Now, e ((x, y) , (x′, y′)) ∧ e ((x′, y′) , (x″, y″)) =1 and x = x′ = x″ implies y ≤ y′ and y′ ≤ y″. Hence, y ≤ y″ and so e ((x, y) , (x″, y″)) =1, that is a contradiction. Now, let e ((x, y) , (x″, y″)) =0. Then x > x″. If x ≤ x′ and x′ ≤ x″, then x ≤ x″, that is a contradiction. So x > x′ or x′ > x″. By definition of e, e ((x, y) , (x′, y′)) =0 or e ((x, y) , (x′, y′)) =0. Therefore (E3) holds. Now, let e ((x, y) , (x′, y′)) ≤1 for x, x′, y, y′ ∈ R. If x > x′, then e ((x′, y′) , (x, y)) =1. Now, let x = x′. Then y′ < y and so e ((x′, y′) , (x, y)) =1. Therefore, (T, e) is a strong totally L-ordered group.
(ii) Let L = {0, a, b, 1} be a bounded lattice such that a ∨ b = 1. Then (Z, e1) and (Z, e2) are strong totallyL-ordered groups, where e1 and e2 are defined as follows, for any
Obviously (E1) and (E3) hold. For any , if m ≤ k, then e1 (m, k) =1. So (E2) hold. Now, let m > k. Then e1 (m, k) = a. We have e ((1, 2) , (2, 1)) = e1 (1, 2) ∧ e2 (2, 1) =1 ∧ b = b ≠ 1. Also, e ((2, 1) , (1, 2)) = a ≠ 1. So is not a strong totally L-ordered group.
Lemma 4.11.Every strong totallyL-ordered group is anL-lattice ordered group.
Proof. Let (G, e) be a strong totally L-ordered group. For any x, y ∈ G, e (x, y) =1 or e (y, x) =1. So x ≤ ey or x ≤ ey = x. So (G, ≤ e) is a chain. In any chain, join and meet are exist, so (G, ≤ e) is a lattice. Therefore (G, e) is an L-lattice ordered group.□
Let (T, e) be a totally L-ordered group. Set B (T) = {f : (T, e) → (T, e) |f isatotally L - isomorphism}.
Theorem 4.12.Let (T, e) be a totallyL-ordered group. Defineby
Thenwith the composition of functions is anL-ordered group. If (T, e) is a strong totallyL-ordered group, thenis anL-lattice ordered group.
Proof. First we show that (B (T) , ∘) is a group, where ∘ is a composition of functions. Let f, g ∈ B (T). Then for all x, y ∈ T,
Hence f ∘ g is an L-isomorphism and so f ∘ g ∈ B (T). Also, for each f ∈ B (T), by Remark 1, f-1 is an L-isomorphism and so f-1 ∈ B (T). Hence (B (T) , ∘) is a group. Now we show that is an L-order relation.
(E1): , for any f ∈ B (T).
(E2): Let f, g, h ∈ B (T). Then
(E3): If , for f, g ∈ B (T), then ⋀t∈Te (f (t) , g (t)) =1. Hence for any t ∈ T we have e (f (t) , g (t)) =1 and e (g (t) , f (t)) =1 and so f (t) = g (t), for any t ∈ T. Therefore, f = g and so is an L-ordered relation. Now, for any f, g, h ∈ B (T), since h is onto, then for any s ∈ T there is t ∈ T such that h (t) = s. Hence
Moreover, for any t ∈ T, e (f (t) , g (t)) = e (h (f (t)) , allowbreakh (g (t))) and so . Therefore, is an L-ordered group. Now, let (T, e) be a strong totally L-ordered group. By Lemma 4.11, (T, e) is an L-lattice ordered group. For any f, g ∈ B (T), we define f ⊔ g and f ⊓ g on B (T) as follows, for any x ∈ T
We show that f ⊔ g and f ⊓ g belong to B (T). Let h = f ⊔ g. Since f and g are onto, for any t ∈ T there exist s, s′ ∈ T such that f (s) = g (s′) = t. Now, since (T, e) is a strong totally L-ordered group, e (s, s′) =1 or e (s′, s) =1. Without loss of generality, suppose that e (s, s′) =1. Since g is L-isomorphism, e (g (s) , f (s)) = e (g (s) , g (s′)) =1 and so h (s) = g (s) ∨ f (s) = f (s) = t. Hence h is onto. Now let h (t) = h (s) for s, t ∈ T. Then f (s) ∨ g (s) = f (t) ∨ g (t). Since (T, e) is a strong totally L- ordered group, e (t, s) =1 or e (s, t) =1. Without loss of generality, suppose that e (t, s) =1. Then e (f (t) , g (t)) =1 or e (g (t) , f (t)) =1. If e (f (t) , g (t)) =1, then
If e (g (t) , f (t)) =1, by the similar way we can show that e (s, t) ≤1. Hence e (s, t) =1 and so s = t. Therefore, h is one to one. Now, since f and g are L-isomorphism, for any x, y ∈ T, e (x, y) = e (f (x) , f (y)) and e (x, y) = e (g (x) , g (y)). Moreover, since (T, e) is a strong totally L-ordered group, (T, ≤ e) is a totally ordered group. So f (y) ∨ g (y) = f (y) or f (y) ∨ g (y) = g (y). Without loss of generality, suppose that f (y) ∨ g (y) = f (y). Hence
Moreover,
Hence e (x, y) = e (h (x) , h (y)). Therefore, h is an L-isomorphism and so h ∈ B (T). By the similar way, we can show that h = f ⊓ g ∈ B (T). Therefore, is an L-lattice ordered group.□
Conclusion
In the paper, first, we studied and investigated some properties of L-ordered groups and their L-subgroups. Then we improved [3, Theorem. 4.20] by Theorem 3.6, where we proved that if S ∈ LG such that ⊔S exists and ⋁y∈GS (y) =1, then for all a ∈ G, a ∧ ⊔ S = ⊔ (a ∧ S). Also, we found a condition which under the ultraproduct of a family of L-ordered groups is an L-ordered group. Finally, we gave some results about totally L-ordered groups and used them to construct an L-ordered group (an L-lattice ordered group) from a totally ordered group in Theorem 4.12.
References
1.
AndersonM. and FeilT., Lattice-ordered groups, D. Reidel Publishing Co, Dordrecht,
1988.
2.
BlythT.S., Lattices and Ordered Algebraic Structures, Springer-Verlag, 2005.
3.
BorzooeiR.A., DvurecenskijA. and ZahiriO., L-ordered and L-lattice ordered groups, Information Sciences314(1) (2015), 118–134.
4.
FanL., A new approach to quantitative domain theory, Electronic Notes Theor Comp Sci45 (2001), 77–87.
5.
GlassA.M.W.,Partially ordered groups, Word Scientific,
1999.
6.
JohnstoneP.T., Stone Spaces, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982.
7.
KlirG.J. and YuanB., Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic, Theory and Applications, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1995.
8.
MartinekP., Completely lattice L-ordered sets with and without L-equality, Fuzzy Sets Syst166 (2011), 44–55.