Abstract
Glycogen synthase kinase (GSK)-3β is a multifunctional protein that has been implicated in the pathological characteristics of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), including the heightened levels of neurofibrillary tangles, amyloid-beta (Aβ), and neurodegeneration. We have previously shown that an antisense oligonucleotide directed at the Tyr 216 site on GSK-3β (GAO) when injected centrally can decrease GSK-3β levels, improve learning and memory, and decrease oxidative stress. In addition, we showed that GAO can cross the blood-brain barrier. Herein the impact of peripherally administered GAO in both the non-transgenic SAMP8 and transgenic Tg2576 (APPswe) models of AD were examined respective to learning and memory. Brain tissues were then evaluated for expression changes in the phosphorylated-Tyr 216 residue, which leads to GSK-3β activation, and the phosphorylated-Ser9 residue, which reduces GSK-3β activity. SAMP8 GAO-treated mice showed improved acquisition and retention using aversive T-maze, and improved declarative memory as measured by the novel object recognition (NOR) test. Expression of the phosphorylated-Tyr 216 was decreased and the phosphorylated-Ser9 was increased in GAO-treated SAMP8 mice. Tg2576 GAO-treated mice improved acquisition and retention in both the T-maze and NOR tests, with an increased phosphorylated-Ser9 GSK-3β expression. Results demonstrate that peripheral administration of GAO improves learning and memory, corresponding with alterations in GSK-3β phosphorylation state. This study supports peripherally administered GAO as a viable means to mediate GSK-3β activity within the brain and a possible treatment for AD.
INTRODUCTION
Glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3) is a proline-directed serine/threonine kinase that has been implicated in the pathophysiology of various central nervous system disorders [1]. GSK-3 has been implicated as a central factor in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) due to its role in the phosphorylation the microtubule protein tau [2]. Recently, there has been interest in GSK-3 as a target for therapy for AD [3].
GSK-3 comes in two forms: GSK-3α and GSK-3β. They are ubiquitously expressed and involved in a variety of cellular processes [2]. GSK-3β is thought to be involved in multiple diseases such as cancer, diabetes, and neurological pathologies such as Parkinson’s disease, bipolar disorder, and AD [4–7]. In AD, GSK-3β is involved in the regulation of microtubule-associated protein tau [8]. In addition, GSK-3β is thought to be the molecular link between Aβ and tau, by regulating the phosphorylation of tau, and Aβ through the α- and γ-secretases [9].
GSK-3β is phosphorylated at tyrosine 216 (GSK-3βTyr216) to make an active form and at serine 9 (GSK-3β) to make an inactive form [10]. Enhancing GSK-3βSer9 reduces the negative effects of GSK-3β had in the brain, such as increased phosphorylation of tau, elevated amyloid-beta (Aβ), and increased oxidative stress [9]. Decreasing GSK-3βTyr216 reduces the phosphorylation of tau [11].
The SAMP8 mouse is a model of sporadic AD that develops deficits in learning and memory starting at approximately 8 months of age [12, 13]. SAMP8 mice exhibit an age-related increase in Aβ, tau phosphorylation, and oxidative stress [14–17]. The cognitive deficits can be reversed by lowering Aβ with antisense directed at APP [14, 18]. More recently, treatments that reduce GSK-3β have been found by us and others [19, 20] to improve learning and memory, and decrease oxidative stress in SAMP8 mice.
The Tg2576(APPswe) mouse is a transgenic mouse model of AD which is genetically altered to overexpress human Aβ [21]. The Tg2576 has also been found to have elevated tau [22]. Tau immunotherapy in the Tg2576 improved learning and memory and decreased Aβ oligomers [23]. The antihypertensive drug propranolol given to Tg2576 mice also decreased Aβ and phosphorylated tau as well as increasing active GSK-3β [22].
We recently published results showing the GAO antisense could improve learning and memory when administered intracerebroventricularly (ICV) to the SAMP8 mouse, and lowered GSK-3β and decreased oxidative stress [19]. We also showed that the antisense can cross the blood-brain barrier. Here, we examined the effects of GSK antisense on learning and memory after peripheral administration in two mouse strains of AD. In addition, we verified that the antisense alters levels of active and inactive GSK-3β after peripheral administration. These studies demonstrated that lowering GSK-3β in the brain improves AD-like changes that occur with aging in the SAMP8 mouse.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animal subjects
The SAMP8 male mice were 12-month-old males from our breeding colony at the time of behavioral testing. The Tg2576 (APPswe) mice were 13-month-old males and their age equivalent wild type controls (WT) from Taconic (Germantown, NY). Mice were 2 months old when received from the vendor and housed 2 to 4 per cage until testing at 13 months of age. Mice were individually housed for 3 weeks during behavioral testing to ensure each mouse was equally aroused and equally exposed to external stimuli (T-maze buzzer) during testing. All studies were conducted with the approval of the Animal Care and Use Committee at the VA Medical Center, St. Louis, MO. Sentinels from the facility were tested regularly to ensure our facility is virus- and pathogen-free. Food (Richland 5001) and water were available on an ad libitum basis and the rooms had a 12-h light-dark cycle with lights on at 0600 h. Behavioral experiments were conducted between 0730 and1100 h.
Antisense
GSK antisense oligonucleotide (GAO) [sequence: 5’ (P = S) GGTTACCTTGCTGCCATCTT-3’], or random antisense (RAO) (sequence: 5’ (P = S) GATCACGTACACATCGACAC-3’) (Midland Certified Reagent Company, Midland, TX) were synthesized. Mice received one weekly intravenous (IV) injection for a total of 5 injections of antisense (6 μg/100 μl/IV) during the course of study. Behavioral testing began 3 days after the third injection. Mice were sacrificed 3 days after their 5th injection at the end of behavioral testing.
Chemicals and materials
All chemicals were of the highest purity and purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) unless stated otherwise. Nitrocellulose membranes, polyacrylamide gels, XT MES electrophoresis running buffer, and Precision Plus Proteintrademark, and all Blue Standards were purchased from Biorad (Hercules, CA).
Behavioral testing
T-Maze training and testing procedures
Acquisition was tested 5 days after the third injection in an aversive T-maze. The T-maze is both a learning task based on working-memory and a reference-memory task. The T-maze consisted of a black plastic alley with a start box at one end and two goal boxes at the other. The start box was separated from the alley by a plastic guillotine door that prevented movement down the alley until raised at the onset of training. An electrifiable floor of stainless steel rods ran throughout the maze to deliver a mild scrambled foot-shock.
Mice were not permitted to explore the maze prior to training. A block of training trials began when a mouse was placed into the start box. The guillotine door was raised and a cue buzzer sounded simultaneously; 5 s later foot-shock was applied. The arm of the maze entered on the first trial was designated “incorrect” and the mild foot-shock was continued until the mouse entered the other goal box, which in all subsequent trials was designated as “correct” for the particular mouse. At the end of each trial, the mouse was returned to its home cage until the next trial.
Mice were trained until they made one avoidance. Training used an inter-trial interval of 35 s, the buzzer was of the door-bell type sounded at 55 dB, and shock was set at 0.35 mA (Coulbourn Instruments scrambled grid floor shocker model E13-08). Retention was tested one week later by continuing training until mice reached the criterion of 5 avoidances in 6 consecutive trials. The results were reported as the number of trials to first avoidance for acquisition and the number of trials to criterion for the retention test.
Novel object recognition
Novel object recognition (NOR) was tested the three days following T-maze retention testing. NOR is a declarative memory task that involves the hippocampus when, as performed here, the retention interval is 24 h after initial exposure to the objects [24]. Mice were habituated to an empty apparatus for 5 min a day for 3 days prior to entry of the objects. During the training session, the mouse was exposed to two similar objects (plastic frogs), which it was allowed to examine for 5 min. The apparatus and the objects were cleaned between each mouse. Twenty-four h later, the mouse was exposed to one of the original objects and a new novel object in a new location and the percent of time spent examining the new object was recorded. The novel object was made out of the same material as the original object and of the same size, but a different shape. This eliminated the possibility of smell associated with a particular object being a factor. The underlying concept of the task is based on the tendency of mice to spend more time exploring new, novel objects than familiar objects. Thus, the greater the retention/memory at 24 h, the more time spent with the new object. The results were reported as the percent time exploring the novel object of the total exploration time.
Western blot sample preparation
In study one, the cortex, hippocampus, septum, and amygdala of respective mice were flash frozen and stored at –80°C until use. Respective matched brain regions were pooled in twos. In the second study, brains were cut in ½ and flash frozen. The assays were performed on ½ brain. Based on the weight, cold RIPA buffer containing a mini-complete protease inhibitor (1 tablet/10 ml Roche, NJ) and phos-stop phosphatase inhibitor cocktail tablets(1 tablet/10 ml Roche, NJ) was added in a 1:10 volume (0.1 g = 1 ml) and then homogenized. The sample was then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 20 min at 4°C. The supernatant was taken and a BCA protein assay (Pierce/Thermo Fisher, IL) was run using prepared albumin standards (Pierce/Thermo Fisher, IL), and sample aliquots frozen at –80°C.
Western blot
Antibodies used in western blot analysis: pSer9 GSK-3β (Cell signaling), pTyr216 GSK-3β (BD Biosciences), total GSK-3β (BD biosciences), and actin (Sigma). The secondary antibodies were anti-rabbit IgG HRP (Cell signaling), anti-mouse IgG HRP (BD Biosciences), and anti-mouse IgG HRP (BD Biosciences).
Samples were heated at 95°C for 10 min in 2x SDS/20x reducing agent and PBS at a 1x concentration. They were then separated using an electrophoretic field using 10% Bis/Tris Criterion XT gels (Bio-Rad) at 200 V for 55 min using MOPS running buffer for GSK-3β analysis. The proteins were then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes at 240 mA for 45 min (4°C). After all transfers, gels were additionally evaluated with GelCode Blue Stain (Pierce, Rockford, IL).
The membranes were blocked overnight at 4°C using 5% BSA-Tris-buffered saline (20 mM Tris base, 137 mM NaCl, pH 7.6 with 0.1% Tween) for pSer9 GSK-3β and pTyr216 GSK-3β, or 5% nonfat milk-Tris buffered saline for total GSK-3β. Following overnight blocking, membranes were incubated with either pSer9 GSKβ (1:1000), pTyr216 GSK-3β (1:1000), or total GSK-3β (1:1000) at 4°C for 24 h. Following standard wash protocol and respective secondary incubation, anti-rabbit IgG HRP (1:2000), anti-mouse IgG HRP (1:1000), and anti-mouse IgG HRP (1:1000), respectively (60 min), blots were developed using the enhanced chemiluminescence method for pSer9 GSK-3β and pSer9 GSK-3β (SuperSignal West Dura, Pierce) or using Amersham ECL Western blotting detection for actin or total GSK-3β. Optical densities of expressed bands were measured by calibrated densitometer (ChemiDoc XRS, Biorad). The percent expression as compared to controls was calculated for each sample. pSer9 GSK-3β and pTyr216 GSK-3β expression were additionally normalized using total GSK-3β expression.
Statistical analysis
Results from the T-maze were analyzed by aT-test. Statistical significance for comparing changes in GSK-3β expression in different brain regions between treated and control SAMP8 mice were analyzed using independent samples t-test. Statistical significance for comparing changes in GSK-3β expression in transgenic control, transgenic treated, and wild-type control mice were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Bonferroni post-hoc tests were used if the one-way ANOVA was significant. Expression statistical analyses were conducted using R studio. Significant differences were set at p < 0.05.
RESULTS
GAO on learning and memory in SAMP8 mice
Twelve-month-old SAMP8 mice administer GAO or RAO were tested in T-maze foot shock avoidance acquisition. One week later, the mice were tested for retention. The T-test for trial to first avoidance during acquisition in the T-maze showed a significant effect T(17) = 3.21, p < 0.005. The mice that received GAO took significantly fewer trials to reach their first avoidance (10.10±0.566) than the mice that received random antisense (12.56±0.503) (Fig. 1A). The T-test for trials to criterion on the retention test showed a significant effect T(17) = 3.427, p < 0.003 (Fig. 1B). The mice that received GAO (8.50±0.76) took significantly fewer trials to reach criterion than the mice that received RAO (15.88±2.224).
The T-test for time spent exploring the two objects was not significantly different between the two groups: T(16) = 0.18, p NS (1C); GAO (13.60±2.62) and RAO (13.00±1.79). The T-test for time exploring the novel object during the 24-h retention test was not significant: T(16) = 2.758, p < 0.01. The mice that received GAO (63.60±2.20) spent a significantly greater amount of time exploring the novel object than the mice that received random antisense (52.86±3.45) (Fig. 1D).
GAO on levels of total GSK-3, pSer9GSK-3, and pTyrGSK216 in SAMP8 mice
Western blot analysis was used to determine the effect of GAO treatment on expression of pTyr 216 GSK-3β and pSer9 GSK-3β in different brain regions of SAMP8 mice. In mice treated with GAO, there were no differences in total GSK-3; however, expression of pTyr 216 GSK-3β (active) in the amygdala significantly decreased by 21.57% compared to mice treated with RAO (Fig. 2, p < 0.05, n = 6/group). Expression of pSer9 GSK-3β (inactive) in the hippocampus significantly increased by 18.40% in mice treated with GAO compared to mice treated with RAO (Fig. 2, p < 0.05, n = 6/group).
GAO on learning and memory in Tg2576 mice
Tg2576 treated with GAO or RAO or WT control mice treated with RAO were tested in T-maze foot shock avoidance acquisition. One week later, the mice were tested for retention. The ANOVA for trials to criterion during acquisition in the T-maze produced a significant effect F(2,24) = 5.53, p < 0.01. Tukey’s post hoc test indicated that the Tg2576 mice that received GAO and the WT mice that receive RAO took significantly fewer trials to reach first avoidance than the Tg2576 mice that received RAO. There was no difference between the Tg2576 mice that received GAO versus the WT mice that received RAO (Fig. 3A). The ANOVA for trials to criterion on the retention test showed a significant effect: F(2, 24) = 12.46, p < 0.001 (Fig. 3B). The Tg2576 mice that received GAO and the WT mice that received RAO took significantly fewer trials to reach criterion than the mice that received RAO. The Tg2576 mice that received GAO were not significantly different from the WT mice that received RAO.
The ANOVA for time exploring the novel object during the 24-h retention test showed a significant effect: F(2,27) = 6.93, p < 0.004. Tukey’s post hoc test indicate that the Tg2576 mice that received GAO and the WT mice that received RAO spent significantly more time exploring the novel object than the mice that received RAO. There was no difference between the Tg2576 mice that received GAO and the WT mice that received RAO (Fig. 3D). The ANOVA for total exploration time on Day 1 was not significant: F(2,27) = 0.99, p NS.
GAO on levels of total GSK-3, pSer9GSK-3 GSK, and pTyrGSK216 GSK in Tg2576 mice
Western blot was used to determine the effect of antisense treatment on expression of pTyr216 GSK-3β (active) and pSer9 GSK-3β in the brains of Tg2576 and WT mice (n = 5/group, Fig. 4). Treatment was found to have no effect on total GSK-3; however, there was a significant effect on expression of pSer9 GSK-3β (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA). In transgenic mice treated with GAO, pSer9 GSK-3β expression significantly increased by 21.1% compared to transgenic mice treated with RAO (Bonferroni post-hoc, p < 0.05). Treatment was also found to have a significant effect on the expression of pTyr216 GSK-3β (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA). In transgenic mice treated with GAO, pTyr216 GSK-3β expression was decreased by 10.9% compared to transgenic mice treated with RAO. However, the significant difference in pTyr216 expression was only found between transgenic mice treated with GAO compared to WT mice treated with RAO (Bonferonni post-hoc test, p < 0.05).
DISCUSSION
The regulatory kinase GSK-3β has received a lot of attention in the last 10 years as a possible target in AD [25–29]. Evidence of the involvement of GSK-3β in AD continues to grow [30, 31]. We had previously shown that an antisense that targets GSK-3β improved cognition and decreased oxidative stress after central administration [19]. In the same set of studies, we demonstrated that this antisense can cross the blood-brain barrier. Here, we examined GSK-3β antisense after peripheral administration in both a spontaneous onset and transgenic mouse models of AD. Peripherally administered GAO was able to improved learning and memory in both aged SAMP8 and Tg2576 mouse models of AD. This treatment resulted in increased inactive GSK-3βSer9 in both the SAMP8 and the Tg2576 mice and decreased active GSK-3βTyr9 in the SAMP8. The current results suggest that decreasing active and/or increasing inactive phosphorylated forms of GSK-3β are the important factors for improving memory in mouse models of AD.
Improvement of memory after GAO administration and an associated increase in GSK-3βSer9 is similar to studies using lithium [32]. Lithium has been shown to increase GSK-3βSer9 and improve memory in transgenic mice [33]. In clinical studies, small doses of lithium had no effect on patients with moderate AD [7]. Lithium was able to stabilize patients with mild cognitive impairment, possibly delaying the progression of the disease [34].
GSK-3β antisense also reduced the active form GSK-3βTyr216 in SAMP8 mice. Increase GSK-3βTyr216 has been found in pretangle changes in AD [35] and upregulated in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus of AD patients [31, 36]. Decreasing GSK-3βTyr216 has been found to improve memory in mice with streptozotocin-induce tau hyperphosphorylation [37]. Here, we found that in the SAMP8 decreasing active and/or increasing inactive around 20% in the hippocampus and amygdala had a positive effect on memory. In the transgenics, the change was around 10%; however, this may have been due to the fact that we only measured ½ brains as a verification we were changing brain GSK-3β phosphorylated forms.
GSK-3β has an active role in memory through the involvement in the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling [38]. Inhibition of PI3K leads to overactivation of GSK-3 resulting impaired memory [39]. In the SAMP8 with age-related memory impairment, we found that gene expression in the PI3K pathway was altered with age [40]. Impairment in PI3K pathway has been associated with impaired long-term potentiation and important factor in memory [38] as does overexpression of active GSK-3β [2]. Taken together these findings suggest that GAO improvement in memory may be working through the PI3K pathway.
The SAMP8 and Tg2576 mice used in this study were treated with antisense oligonucleotide directed at GSK-3β and random antisense oligonucleotide, the latter serving as the control. The GSK-3β antisense has a sequence that corresponds to 94–113 nucleotides downstream from the initiation codon of GSK-mRNA. This is an internal sequence with high probability of being located away from any loop formation in the mRNA. As an internal site, it should not block 100% of GSK mRNA. This is important as GSK-3β is essential for intracellular signaling pathways such as cell proliferation, cellular migration, glucose regulation, inflammatory responses, and apoptosis [41]. Therefore, given the critical cellular functions of GSK-3β, antisense treatment may be an effective way to control the over-activity of the kinase without completely blocking its functions. Antisenses are currently in various stages of testing for such conditions as cancer, hypercholesterolemia, Ebola virus infection, type 2 diabetes, HIV infection, and ocular disease, and may be a feasible treatment for AD as well [42–45].
In conclusion, this paper provides evidence that the reduction of GSK-3β with antisense improves cognition by altering levels of active and inactive GSK-3β in two mouse models of AD. The ability of peripherally administered GAO to reduce active GSK-3β suggests that GAO should be investigated further as a potential treatment for AD.
