Fingers-transmitted vibration can cause vibration-induced white finger. The effectiveness of vibration-reducing (VR)
gloves for reducing hand transmitted vibration to the fingers has not been sufficiently examined.
Objective
The objective of this study is to examine tool-specific performance of VR gloves for reducing finger-transmitted vibrations in three orthogonal directions (3D) from powered hand tools.
Methods
A transfer function method was used to estimate the tool-specific effectiveness of four typical VR gloves. The transfer functions of the VR glove fingers in three directions were either measured in this study or during a previous study using a 3D laser vibrometer. More than seventy vibration spectra of various tools or machines were used in the estimations.
Results
When assessed based on frequency-weighted acceleration, the gloves provided little vibration reduction. In some cases, the gloves amplified the vibration by more than 10%, especially the neoprene glove. However, the neoprene glove did the best when the assessment was based on unweighted acceleration. The neoprene glove was able to reduce the vibration by 10% or more of the unweighted vibration for 27 out of the 79 tools. If the dominant vibration of a tool handle or workpiece was in the shear direction relative to the fingers, as observed in the operation of needle scalers, hammer chisels, and bucking bars, the gloves did not reduce the vibration but increased it.
Conclusions
This study confirmed that the effectiveness for reducing vibration varied with the gloves and the vibration reduction of each glove depended on tool, vibration direction to the fingers, and finger location. VR gloves, including certified anti-vibration gloves do not provide much vibration reduction when judged based on frequency-weighted acceleration. However, some of the VR gloves can provide more than 10% reduction of the unweighted vibration for some tools or workpieces. Tools and gloves can be matched for better effectiveness for protecting the fingers.
GriffinMJ. Handbook of human vibration. Academic Press, London, 1990.
2.
NIOSH. Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors - a critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, and low back. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-141, 1997.
3.
ISO 5349-1, 2001: Mechanical vibration - Measurement and evaluation of human exposure to hand-transmitted vibration - Part 1: General requirements. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
4.
ANSI S2.70, 2006: Guide for the measurement and evaluation of human exposure to vibration transmitted to the hand (revision of ANSI S3.34-1986). New York: American National Standards Institute (ANSI).
5.
RensG, DubrulleP, MalchaireJ.Efficiency of conventional gloves against vibration. Annals of Occupational Hygiene. 1987; 31(2), 249–254.
6.
GoelVK, RimK.Role of gloves in reducing vibration: Analysis for pneumatic chipping hammer. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal. 1987; 48(1), 9–14.
7.
ReynoldsD, JetzerT.Use of air bladder technology to solve hand tool vibration problems. 1998. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Hand-Arm Vibrations, Umea, Sweden.
8.
MahbubH, YokoyamaK, LaskarS, InoueM, TakahashiY, YamamotoS.Assessing the influence of antivibration glove on digital vascular responses to acute hand-arm vibration. Journal of Occupational Health. 2007; 49(3), 165–171.
9.
JetzerT, HaydonP, ReynoldsDD. Effective intervention with ergonomics, antivibration gloves, and medical surveillance to minimize hand-arm vibration hazards in the workplace. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2003; 45(12), 1312–1317.
10.
Health and Safety Executive (HSE). Hand-arm vibration. The Control of Vibration at Work Regulations. 2005. Guidance on Regulations. L140. Sudbury: HSE Books ISBN 978 0 717661251 www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/books/L140.htm.
11.
ISO 10819, 1996: Mechanical vibration and shock - Hand-arm vibration - Method for the measurement and evaluation of the vibration transmissibility of gloves at the palm of the hand. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
12.
ISO 10819, 2013: Mechanical vibration and shock - Hand-arm vibration - Method for the measurement and evaluation of the vibration transmissibility of gloves at the palm of the hand. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
13.
DongRG, McDowellTW, WelcomeDE, BarkleyJ, WarrenC, WashingtonB.Effects of hand-tool coupling conditions on the isolation effectiveness of air bladder anti-vibration gloves. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control. 2004; 23(4), 231–248.
14.
HewittS.Assessing the performance of anti-vibration gloves - a possible alternative to ISO 10819:1996. Annals of Occupational Hygiene. 1998; 42(4), 245–252.
PintoI, StacchiniN, BovenziM, PaddanGS, GriffinMJ. Protection effectiveness of anti-vibration gloves: field evaluation and laboratory performance assessment. The proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Hand-Arm Vibration, Nancy, France, 2001, 387–394.
17.
WelcomeDE, DongRG, McDowellTW, XuXS, and WarrenC.An evaluation of the revision of ISO 10819. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2012; 42(1), 143–155.
18.
McDowellTW, DongRG, WelcomeDE, WarrenC, and XuXS. Vibration-reducing gloves: Transmissibility at the palm of the hand in three orthogonal directions. Ergonomics. 2013; 56(12), 1823–1840.
19.
GriffinMJ, MacfarlaneCR, and NormanCD. The transmission of vibration to the hand and the influence of Gloves. Vibration Effects on the Hand and Arm in Industry. Edit by Brammer, A.J. and Taylor. W., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1982, 103–116.
20.
PaddanGS, and GriffinMJ. Measurement of glove and hand dynamics using knuckle vibration. Proceedings of the 9th international conference on hand-arm vibration, 1982. Section 15(6). Nancy, France.
21.
WelcomeDE, DongRG, XuXS, WarrenC, McDowellTW. The effects of vibration-reducing gloves on finger vibration. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2014; 44, 45–59.
22.
ChangCH, WangMJJ, LinSC. Evaluating the effects of wearing gloves and wrist support on hand-arm response while operating an in-line pneumatic screwdriver, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 1999; 24, 473–481.
DongRG, McDowellTW, WelcomeDE, WarrenC, WuJZ, and RakhejaS.Analysis of anti-vibration gloves mechanism and evaluation methods. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2009; 321, 435–453.
25.
GriffinMJ. Evaluating the effectiveness of gloves in reducing hazards hand-transmitted vibration. Occupational and Environment Medicine. 1998; 55, 340–348.
26.
RakhejaS, DongRG, WelcomeDE, and SchopperAW. Estimation of tool-specific isolation performance of anti-vibration gloves. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2002; 30(2), 71–87.
27.
DongRG, McDowellTW, WelcomeDE, RakhejaS, CaporaliSA, and SchopperAW. Effectiveness of a transfer function method for evaluating vibration isolation performance of gloves when used with chipping hammers. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control. 2002a; 21(3), 141–155.
28.
DongRG, WelcomeDE, PetersonDR, XuXS, McDowellTW, WarrenC, AsakiT, KudernatschS, BrammerA.Tool-Specific Performance of Vibration-Reducing Gloves for Attenuating Palm-Transmitted Vibrations in Three Orthogonal Directions. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2014; 44, 827–839.
29.
EN 420, 2003. Protective Gloves. General Requirements and Test Methods. European Committee for Standardization (CEN).
30.
WimerBM, McDowellTW, XuXS, WelcomeDE, WarrenC, and DongRG. Effects of gloves on the total grip strength applied to cylindrical handles. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2010; 40(4), 574–583.
31.
DongRG, RakhejaS, SmutzWP, SchopperAW, WelcomeDE, WuJZ. Evaluating anti-vibration performance of a glove using total effective transmissibility. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2002b; 30(1), 33–48.
32.
DongRG, WelcomeDE, McCormickR.A novel 3-D hand-arm vibration test system and its preliminary evaluation. Proceedings of the 1st American Conference on Human Vibration, Morgantown, WV, June, 2006.
33.
GriffinMJ. Measurement, evaluation, and assessment of occupational exposures to hand-transmitted vibration. Occupational Environmental Medicine. 1997; 54(2), 73–89.
34.
McDowellTW, WelcomeDE, WarrenC, XuXS, and DongRG. The Effect of a Mechanical Arm System on Portable Grinder Vibration Emissions. Annals of Occupational Hygiene. 2016; 60(3): 371–386.
35.
LinHS, ChenGP, TangSC, XianB, XuGY, YanMS, YanH, ChenQS. A preliminary investigation on the factors influencing the vibration of a handheld workpiece during its fine polishing process. The Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Hand-Arm Vibration, Beijing, China, 2015, 61–62.
36.
McDowellTW, WarrenC, XuXS, WelcomeDE, and DongRG. Laboratory and Workplace Assessments of Rivet Bucking Bar Vibration Emissions. Annals of Occupational Hygiene. 2015; 59(3), 382–397.
37.
PittsPM, MasonHJ, PooleKA, YoungCE. Relative performance of Frequency Weighting Wh and candidates for alternative frequency weightings when used to predict the occurrence of hand-arm vibration induced injuries. Industrial Health. 2012; 50(5), 388–396.
38.
DongRG, WelcomeDE, McDowellTW, XuXS, KrajnakK, WuJZ. A proposed theory on biodynamic frequency weighting for hand-transmitted vibration exposure, Industrial Health. 2012; 50(5), 412–424.
39.
NilssonT, BurströmL, HagbergM.Risk assessment of vibration exposure and white fingers among platers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1989; 61, 473–481.
40.
BarregardL, EhrenströmL, MarcusK.Hand-arm vibration syndrome in Swedish car mechanics. Occup Environ Med. 2003; 60, 287–294.
41.
StarckJ, JussiP, IlmariP.Physical characteristics of vibration in relation to vibration-induced white finger. AIHAJ. 1990; 51(4), 179–184.
42.
DandanellR, and EngstromK.Vibration from riveting tools in the frequency range 6 Hz-10 MHz and Raynaud's phenomenon. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 1986; 12, 338–342.
43.
BovenziM.Exposure-response relationship in the hand-arm vibration syndrome: An overview of current epidemiology research. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1998; 71, 509–519.
44.
GriffinM, BovenziM, NelsonCM. Dose-response patterns for vibration-induced white finger. Occup Environ Med. 2003; 60, 16–26.
45.
TominagaY.New frequency weighting of hand-arm vibration, Ind Health. 2005; 43, 509–515.
