The Hindu Rights Action Force and the Definition of the ‘Indian Community’ in Malaysia

Abstract

The Hindu Rights Action Force (HINDRAF) started in 2006 as a coalition of non-governmental organizations and various individuals struggling for the preservation and protection of Hindus’ rights in Malaysia. Although the coalition began as a religious movement, it ended up widening the scope of its mandate so as to include various demands for social and economic rights. The present paper describes some representations of the ‘Indian community’ as these are expressed in HINDRAF's discourses and in some supporters’ views on the condition of Malaysian Indians. In particular, the paper examines processes of ethnic boundary making and unmaking, more specifically how ethnic boundaries are both expanded and contracted on the basis of various socio-cultural and economic factors.

Keywords

HINDRAF Malaysian Indians Ethnicity Boundaries Hindu Minority Rights

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahmed

and Stacey

(2001) ‘Testimonial Cultures: An Introduction’, Cultural Values Vol. 5, No. 1, p. 1–6. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/14797580109367217]

Alba

(2005) ‘Bright vs. blurred boundaries: Second generation assimilation and exclusion in France, Germany, and the United States’, Ethnic and Racial Studies Vol. 28, No. 1, p. 20–49. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/0141987042000280003]

Ampalavanar Brown

(1993) The Contemporary Indian Political Elite in Malaysia in Sandhu

and Mani

(Eds.) Indian Communities in Southeast Asia, Singapore: Times Academic Press and Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Arasaratnam

(1970) Indians in Malaysia and Singapore, London: Oxford University Press.

Arasaratnam

(1993) Malaysian Indians. The Formation of Incipient Society in Sandhu

and Mani

(Eds.) Indian Communities in Southeast Asia, Singapore: Times Academic Press and Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Barth

(1994) Enduring and Emerging Issues in the Analysis of Ethnicity in Vermeulen

and Govers

(Eds.) The Anthropology of Ethnicity: Beyond ‘Ethnic Groups and Boundaries’, Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.

Baxstrom

(2000) ‘Governmentality, Bio-Power, and the Emergence of the Malayan-Tamil Subject on the Plantations of Colonial Malaya’, Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Southeast Asian Studies Vol. 14, Issue 2, p. 49–78.

Brant

(2007) Malaysia's Lingering Ethnic Divide. Retrieved December 3 2007 available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/asia-pacific/7121534.stm.

Brown

G K

, Deneulin

, and Devine

(2009) ‘Contesting The Boundaries of Religion in Social Mobilization’, Bath Papers in International Development Vol. 4. Available at http://www.bath.ac.uk/cds/publications/bpid4.pdf.

10.

Brubaker

(2004). Ethnicity without Groups, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

11.

Cangià

(2012) “‘Children of Kinegawa’ and the Transformation of the ‘Buraku Identity’ in Japan', Childhood Vol. 19, Issue 3, p. 360–374.

12.

Cieslik

and Verkuyten

(2006) ‘National, Ethnic and Religious Identities: Hybridity and the Case of the Polish Tatars’, National Identities Vol. 8, No. 2, p. 77–93. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/14608940600703650]

13.

Devadas

(2009) Makkal Sakti: The HINDRAF Effect, Race and Postcolonial Democracy in Malaysia in Goh

D P S

, Gabrielpillai

, Holden

and Khoo

G C

(Eds.) Race and Multiculturalism in Malaysia and Singapore, London: Routledge.

14.

Eriksen

T H

(2001) Ethnic Identity, National Identity, and Intergroup Conflict. The Significance of Personal Experience in Ashmore

R D

, Jussim

, and Wilder

(Eds.) Social Identity, Intergroup Conflict, and Conflict Reduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

15.

Giordano

(2012) Celebrating Urban Diversity in a Rainbow Nation: Political Management of Ethnocultural Differences in a Malaysian City in Pardo

and Prato

G B.

(Eds.) Anthropology in the City. Methodology and Theory, Surrey: Ashgate.

16.

Graezer Bideau

and Kilani

(2009) ‘Chinese Clan Jetties of Penang: How Margins are Becoming Part of a World Cultural Heritage’, Chinese Southern Diaspora Studies Vol. 3, p. 143–166.

17.

Heng

P K

(1996) ‘Chinese Responses to Malay Hegemony in Peninsular Malaysia 1957-96’, Southeast Asian Studies Vol. 34, No. 3, p. 500–523.

18.

Holst

(2012) Ethnicization and Identity Construction in Malaysia, New York: Routledge.

19.

Jain

R K

(2004) Race Relations, Ethnicity, Class and Culture: A Comparison of Indians in Trinidad and Malaysia in Jayaram

(Ed.) The Indian Diaspora. Dynamics of Migration, New Delhi: Sage Publications.

20.

Jayaram

(2004) The Indian Diaspora. Dynamics of Migration. Themes in Indian Sociology, Volume 4. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

21.

Jenkins

(2008) Rethinking Ethnicity. Arguments and Explorations, London: SAGE Publications.

22.

Khoo

B T

(2010) ‘Cyber-networks, Physical Coalitions and Missing Links: Imagining and Realizing Dissent in Malaysia 1998-2008’ IDE Discussion Paper No. 244. Available at https://ir.ide.go.jp/dspace/bitstream/2344/909/1/ARRIDE_Discussion_No.244_khoo.pdf.

23.

Khoo

(1999) Envisioning the Malaysian Nation: Ethnic nationalism or corporate capitalism? in Brehony

and Rassool

(Eds.) Nationalisms Old and New, Basingstoke: Macmillan.

24.

Kuecker

, Mulligan

, and Nadarajah

(2011) ‘Turning to Community in Times of Crisis: Globally Derived Insights on Local Community’, Community Development Journal Vol. 46, No. 2, p. 245–264. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1093/cdj/bsq002]

25.

Lamont

and Molnar

(2002) ‘The study of boundaries in the social sciences’, Annual Review of Sociology Vol. 28, p. 167–195. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107]

26.

Lamont

, Morning

and Mooney

(2002) ‘Particular universalisms: North African immigrants respond to French racism, Ethnic and Racial Studies Vol. 25, No. 3, p. 390–414. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/01419870020036701e]

27.

Leong

(2009) ‘The Hindraf Saga: Media and Citizenship in Malaysia’, ANZCA09 Communication, Creativity and Global Citizenship, Brisbane.

28.

Marimuthu

(1993) The Plantation School as an Agent of Social Reproduction in Sandhu

and Mani

(Eds.) Indian Communities in Southeast Asia. Singapore: Times Academic Press and Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

29.

Merry

S E

(2006) ‘Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism: Mapping the Middle’, American Anthropologist Vol. 108, No. 1, p. 38–51. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1525/aa.2006.108.1.38]

30.

Milner

(1998) Ideological Work in Constructing the Malay Majority in Gladney

(Ed.) Making Majorities. Constituting the Nation in Japan, Korea, China, Malaysia, Fiji, Turkey, and the United States, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

31.

Montlake

(2008) ‘Temple Demolitions Anger Malaysia Indians’, Christian Science Monitor February 7.

32.

Muzaffar

(1993) Political Marginalization in Malaysia in Sandhu

and Mani

(Eds.) Indian Communities in Southeast Asia. Singapore: Times Academic Press and Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

33.

Nadarajah

(2004) Another Malaysia is Possible and Other Essays: Writings on Culture and Politics for a Sustainable World, Kuala Lumpur: Nohd Publication.

34.

Nagarajan

(2008) Indians in Malaysia: Towards Vision 2020 in Kesavapany

(Eds.) Rising Indian and Indian Communities in East Asia, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

35.

Nah

A M

(2003) ‘Negotiating Indigenous Identity in Postcolonial Malaysia: Beyond Being 'Not quite/ not Malay’, Social Identities Vol. 9, No. 4, p. 511–534. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/1350463032000174650]

36.

Nagel

(1994) ‘Constructing Ethnicity: Creating and Recreating Ethnic Identity and Culture’, Social Problems Vol. 41, No. 1, p. 152–176. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2307/3096847]

37.

Noor

F A

(2008a) The Hindu Rights Action Force (HINDRAF) of Malaysia: Communitarianism Across Borders? Singapore: S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Working Paper No. 163. Available at http://www.rsis.edu.sg/publications/WorkingPapers/WP163.pdf.

38.

Noor

F A

(2008b) ‘Hindraf and the Pluralisation of the Malaysian-Indian Community’, The Other Malaysia 15 February.

39.

Puthucheary

(1993) Indians in the Public Sector in Malaysia in Sandhu

and Mani

(Eds.) Indian Communities in Southeast Asia, Singapore: Times Academic Press and Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

40.

Rajantheran

(2012) ‘Identity and Language of Tamil Community in Malaysia: Issues and Challenges’, Humanities, Historical and Social Sciences Vol. 48, p. 78–82.

41.

Ramasamy

(2008) ‘The HINDRAF Movement in Malaysia’, Straits Times December.

42.

Sandhu

K S

(1993) The Coming of the Indians to Malaysia in Sandhu

and Mani

(Eds.) Indian Communities in Southeast Asia, Singapore: Times Academic Press and Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

43.

Shamsul

A B

(1996) ‘Debating About Identity in Malaysia: A Discourse Analysis’, Southeast Asian Studies Vol. 34, No. 3, p. 476–499.

44.

Shamsul

A B

(1998) Bureaucratic management of identity in a modern state: ‘Malayness’ in post-war Malaysia in Gladney

D C

(Ed.) Making Majorities. Constituting the Nation in Japan, Korea, China, Malaysia, Fiji, Turkey, and the United States, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

45.

Shamsul

A B

(2001) ‘“Malay” and “Malayness” in Malaysia Reconsidered: a Critical Review’, Communal/Plural Vol. 9, No. 1, p. 69–80. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/13207870125429]

46.

Singh

(2009) ‘Malaysia in 2008: The Elections That Broke the Tiger's Back’, Asian Survey Vol. 49, No. 1, p.156–165. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1525/as.2009.49.1.156]

47.

Snow

D A

(2004) Framing Processes, Ideology, and Discursive Fields in Snow

D A

, Soule

, and Kries

(Eds.) The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Malden: Blackwell.

48.

Vertovec

(2007) ‘Introduction: New Directions in the Anthropology of Migration and Multiculturalism’, Ethnic and Racial Studies Vol. 30, No. 6, p. 961–978. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/01419870701599416]

49.

Weber

(1978) Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretative Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press (Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, Tubinga 1922).

50.

Wemyss

(2008) ‘White Memories, White Belonging: Competing Colonial Anniversaries in ‘Postcolonial’ East London’, Sociological Research Online Vol. 13, No. 5, available at http://www.socresonline.org.uk/13/5/8.html. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.5153/sro.1801]

51.

Willford

A C

(2007) Cage of Freedom: Tamil Identity and the Ethnic Fetish in Malaysia, Singapore: National University of Singapore Press.

52.

Wimmer

(2008) ‘Elementary strategies of ethnic boundary making’, Ethnic and Racial Studies Vol. 31, No. 6, p. 1025–1055. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/01419870801905612]

53.

Wimmer

(2013) Ethnic Boundary Making. Institutions, Power, Networks, Oxford: Oxford University Press. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199927371.001.0001]

54.

Yang

L F

and Ishak

M D S A

(2012) ‘Interethnic Conflict in Malaysia: A Comparative Analysis of Newspaper Coverage on the Hindu Rights Action Force (HINDRAF)’, International Journal of Communication Vol. 6, p.166–189.

55.

Zagefka

(2009). ‘The Concept of Ethnicity in Social Psychological Research: Definitional Issues’, International Journal of Intercultural Relations Vol. 33, p. 228–241. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2008.08.001]

56.

Zawawi

(1996) ‘The Making of a Subaltern Discourse in the Malaysian Nation-State: New Subjectivities and the Poetics of Orang Asli Dispossession and Identity’, Southeast Asian Studies Vol. 34, No. 3, p. 568–600.

57.

(1997) ‘Orang Asli Citizenry and Nationhood: Mediating the Voices of the Bumiputera “Other” in Malaysia’, Asian Studies Review Vol. 21, No. 1, p. 107–14. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/03147539708713143]

58.

(2008) (Ed.) Representation, Identity and Multiculturalism in Sarawak, Kuching: Dayak Cultural Foundation and Kajang: Persatuan Sains Social Malaysia.