An Italian Translation and Validation of the near Activity Visual Questionnaire (NAVQ)

Charman WN Developments in the correction of presbyopia I: spectacle and contact lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014;34(1):8–29.

Jain S Ou R Azar DT Monovision outcomes in presbyopic individuals after refractive surgery. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(8):1430–1433.

Anschütz T Laser correction of hyperopia and presbyopia. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1994;34(4):107–137.

Vinciguerra P Nizzola GM Bailo G Nizzola F Ascari A Epstein D Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for presbyopia: 24-month follow-up in three eyes. J Refract Surg. 1998;14(1):31–37.

McDonald MB Durrie D Asbell P Maloney R Nichamin L Treatment of presbyopia with conductive keratoplasty: six-month results of the 1-year United States FDA clinical trial. Cornea. 2004;23(7):661–668.

Telandro A Pseudo-accommodative cornea: a new concept for correction of presbyopia. J Refract Surg. 2004;20(5)(Suppl):S714–S717.

Ruiz LA Cepeda LM Fuentes VC Intrastromal correction of presbyopia using a femtosecond laser system. J Refract Surg. 2009;25(10):847–854.

Yilmaz OF Bayraktar S Agca A Yilmaz B McDonald MB van de Pol C Intracorneal inlay for the surgical correction of presbyopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(11):1921–1927.

Seyeddain O Hohensinn M Riha W et al. Small-aperture corneal inlay for the correction of presbyopia: 3-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(1):35–45.

Steinert RF Post CT Jr Brint SF et al. A prospective, randomized, double-masked comparison of a zonal-progressive multifocal intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology. 1992;99(6):853–860 discussion 860-861.

Küchle M Nguyen NX Langenbucher A Gusek-Schneider GC Seitz B Hanna KD Implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Refract Surg. 2002;18(3):208–216.

Davison JA Simpson MJ History and development of the apodized diffractive intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(5):849–858.

Schachar RA Cause and treatment of presbyopia with a method for increasing the amplitude of accommodation. Ann Ophthalmol. 1992;24(12):445–447, 452.

Gil-Cazorla R Shah S Naroo SA A review of the surgical options for the correction of presbyopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100(1):62–70.

Varma R Richman EA Ferris FL III Bressler NM Use of patient-reported outcomes in medical product development: a report from the 2009 NEI/FDA Clinical Trial Endpoints Symposium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(12):6095–6103.

US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Fed Regist. 2009;74:65132–65133.

Gupta N Wolffsohn JS Naroo SA Davies LN Gibson GA Shah S Development of a near activity visual questionnaire to assess accommodating intraocular lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2007;30(2):134–143.

Buckhurst PJ Wolffsohn JS Gupta N Naroo SA Davies LN Shah S Development of a questionnaire to assess the relative subjective benefits of presbyopia correction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(1):74–79.

Sheppard AL Shah S Bhatt U Bhogal G Wolffsohn JS Visual outcomes and subjective experience after bilateral implantation of a new diffractive trifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39(3):343–349.

Luger MH McAlinden C Buckhurst PJ Wolffsohn JS Verma S Arba Mosquera S Presbyopic LASIK using hybrid bi-aspheric micro-monovision ablation profile for presbyopic corneal treatments. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;160(3):493–505.

Sivardeen A Laughton D Wolffsohn JS Investigating the utility of clinical assessments to predict success with presbyopic contact lens correction. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016;39(5):322–330.

Bullinger M Alonso J Apolone G et al. Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):913–923.

Guillemin F Bombardier C Beaton D Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(12):1417–1432.

Sousa VD Rojjanasrirat W Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(2):268–274.

Patrick DL Wild DJ Johnson ES Cross cultural validation of quality of life measures. In: Orley A, Kuykev W, eds, Quality of Life Assessment. Berlin, Springer. 1995;19–32.

Rossi GC Milano G Tinelli C The Italian version of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire: translation, validity, and reliability. J Glaucoma. 2003;12(3):213–220.

Rossi GC Pasinetti GM Scudeller L et al. The Italian version of the Glaucoma Symptom Scale Questionnaire: translation, validation, and reliability. J Glaucoma. 2013;22(1):44–51.

Marcon GB Pittino R The Italian version of the Amblyopia and Strabismus Questionnaire: translation, validation, and reliability. Strabismus. 2014;22(3):100–110.

Mangione CM Lee PP Pitts J Gutierrez P Berry S Hays RD NEI-VFQ Field Test Investigators. Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ). Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116(11):1496–1504.

Hays RD Mangione CM Ellwein L Lindblad AS Spritzer KL McDonnell PJ NEI-RQL Research Group. Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute-Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(12):2292–2301.

Pesudovs K Burr JM Harley C Elliott DB The development, assessment, and selection of questionnaires. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84(8):663–674.