University Spin-offs in Sweden: A Longitudinal Study

Abstract

There have been few studies on the long-term performance of university spin-offs (USOs). This paper builds on previous empirical research into the performance of USOs and on the resource-based model of USOs. Several research issues are addressed including, in particular, the long-term performance of Swedish USOs, the distribution of the main types of business, the extent to which USOs have been in contact with support organizations, and by how much the potential growth of USOs has been achieved by the dissemination of technological knowledge to other businesses through patents, licences and other activities of the founder of the USO. The results of studies of 25 Swedish USOs, all started between 1962 and 1990 and with a median age of 25 years, confirm previous research on USOs which experienced limited growth. The analysis indicates that most of the USOs usually operate as ‘simple’ types of business, such as consultancy services; and that 60% have been in contact with support organizations.

Keywords

university spin-offs spin-off development spin-off performance knowledge dissemination Sweden

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Carter

N.M.

Gartner

W.B.

Reynolds

P.D.

(1996), ‘Exploring start-up event sequences’, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol 11, No 3, pp 151–166.

Clarysse

Heinman

Degroof

J. J.

(2001), ‘An institutional and resource-based explanation of growth patterns of research-based spin-offs in Europe’, in Fostering High-Tech Spin-Offs: A Public Strategy for Innovation, OECD STI Review, No 26, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, pp 95–96.

Di Gregorio

Shane

(2003), ‘Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others?’, Research Policy, Vol 32, No 2, pp 209–227.

Druihle

Garnsey

(2004), ‘Do academic spin-outs differ and does it matter?’, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol 29, Nos 3–4, pp 269–285.

Smith

Lawton H.

(2006), ‘Measuring the performance of Oxford University, Oxford Brookes University and the government laboratories' spin-off companies’, Research Policy, Vol 35, No 10, pp 1554–1568.

Lerner

(2005), ‘The university and the start-up: Lessons from the past two decades’, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol 30, Nos 1–2, pp 49–56.

Lindelöf

Löfsten

(2003), ‘Science park location and new technology-based firms in Sweden – implications for strategy and performance’, Small Business Economics, Vol 20, No 3, pp 245–258.

Dahlstrand

Lindholm Å

. (1997), ‘Growth and innovativeness in technology-based spin-off firms’, Research Policy, Vol 26, No 3, pp 331–344.

Mustar

Wright

Clarysse

(2008), ‘University spin-off firms: Lessons from ten years of experience in Europe’, Science and Public Policy, Vol 35, No 2, pp 67–80.

10.

Olofsson

Wahlbin

(1993a), ‘Teknikbaserade företag från högskolan' ('Technology-based firms from higher education'), IMIT, Linköping (in Swedish).

11.

Olofsson

Wahlbin

(1993b), ‘Firms started by university researchers in Sweden – roots, roles, relations, and growth patterns’, in Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 1993, Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Babson College, Wellesley, MA, pp 610–620.

12.

Shane

(2003), A General Theory of Entrepreneurship, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

13.

Shane

(2004), Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

14.

Vohora

Wright

Lockett

(2004), ‘Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies’, Research Policy, Vol 33, No 1, pp 147–175.