The author defines entrepreneurship as the process through which ‘private obsession’ fulfils ‘public need’ (Rorty, 1989, p 37). Adopting this definition as a starting point, narratives are used to illustrate how all the different types of ‘entrepreneurs’ – business people, social entrepreneurs, leaders of political movements – use both personal and historical contingency as resources to fulfil human needs in the public marketplace. This perspective helps to reconcile recent debates in the academic community about both the nature of entrepreneurial opportunity and the problem of embedded agency in institutional entrepreneurship. Throughout the paper, pragmatist philosophy provides theoretical support for this depiction of the entrepreneurial process guiding and shaping a dynamic human landscape.
AldrichH. E. (1990), ‘Using an ecological perspective to study organization founding rates’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol 14, No 3, pp 7–24.
2.
AldrichH. E. (1999), Organizations Evolving, Sage, London.
3.
AldrichH. E.FiolC. M. (1994), ‘Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation’, Academy of Management Review, Vol 19, No 4, pp 645–670.
4.
BaronR. (2007), ‘Behavioral and cognitive factors in entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurs as the active element in new venture creation’, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, Vol 1, pp 167–182.
DenrellJ.KovácsB. (2008), ‘Selective sampling of empirical settings in organizational studies’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol 53, pp 109–144.
7.
DewN. (2009), ‘Serendipity in entrepreneurship’, Organization Studies, Vol 30, No 7, pp 735–753.
8.
FligsteinN. (1997), ‘Social skill and institutional theory’, American Behavioral Scientist, Vol 40, pp 397–405.
9.
GouldS. J. (1989), Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History, W.W. Norton, New York.
10.
HarmelingS. S.SarasvathyS. D.FreemanR. E. (2009), ‘Related debates in ethics and entrepreneurship: Values, opportunity and contingency’, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol 84, No 3, pp 341–365.
11.
HjorthD.JonesC.GartnerW. B. (2008), ‘Introduction for “recreating/recontextualising” entrepreneurship’, Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol 24, No 2, pp 81–84.
12.
HjorthD.SteyaertC., eds (2009), The Politics and Aesthetics of Entrepreneurship (a fourth Movements in Entrepreneurship book), Edward Elgar, London.
13.
HolmP. (1995), ‘The dynamics of institutionalization: Transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol 40, pp 398–422.
14.
KalantaridisC. (2004), Understanding the Entrepreneur: An Institutionalist Perspective, Ashgate, Aldershot.
15.
KirznerI. (1979), Perception, Opportunity, and Profit, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
16.
LachsJ.TalisseR. B. (2008), American Philosophy: An Encyclopedia, Routledge, New York and London.
17.
LecaB.BattilanaJ.BoxenbaumE. (2008), Agency and Institutions: A Review of Institutional Entrepreneurship, Harvard Business School Working Paper Series, Boston, MA.
18.
MaguireS.HardyC.LawrenceT. B. (2004), ‘Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 47, No 5, pp 657–679.
Reus-SmitC. (1999), The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
21.
RortyR. (1989), Contingency, Irony and Solidarity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
22.
SahakianW. S. (1968), History of Philosophy: From the Earliest Times to the Present, Barnes and Noble, New York.
23.
SalmonJ. L. (2008), ‘Pulling up roots to plant seeds of hope’, Washington Post, 21 September.
24.
SarasvathyS. D. (2001), ‘Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency’, Academy of Management Review, Vol 26, No 2, pp 243–288.
25.
SarasvathyS. D.DewN. (2005), ‘Entrepreneurial logics for a technology of foolishness’, Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol 21, No 4, pp 385–406.
26.
SchumpeterJ. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Harper and Row, New York.
27.
ScottW. R. (1995), Institutions and Organizations, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
28.
ScottW. R. (2004), ‘Institutional theory’, in RitzerG., ed, Encyclopedia of Social Theory, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 408–414.
29.
ShahS. K.TripsasM. (2007), ‘The accidental entrepreneur: The emergent and collective process of user entrepreneurship’, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, Vol 1, pp 123–140.
30.
ShaneS. (2000), ‘Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities’, Organizational Science, Vol 11, pp 448–469.
31.
ShaneS.EckhardtJ. (2003), ‘The individual–opportunity nexus’, in AcsZ.AudretschD., eds, Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: An Interdisciplinary Survey and Introduction, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.
32.
ShaneS.VenkataramanS. (2000), ‘The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research’, Academy of Management Review, Vol 25, No 1, pp 217–226.
33.
StevensonH. H.JarilloJ. (1990), ‘A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 11, pp 17–27.
34.
StroupS. (2007), ‘Couple find a mission in St. Bernard’, New Orleans Times Picayune, 12 June.
35.
WeberM. (1994), Weber: Political Writings (Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought), LassmanPeter, ed; SpeirsRonald, trans, Cambridge University Publishers, Cambridge, MA.
