Risk management in agriculture is a major policy issue in current EU agriculture policy reforms. Public support systems may play two different roles, one as a device to deliver disaster assistance and another to enhance insurance for marketable risks. This paper contributes to the literature by analysing the trade-offs between providing catastrophic assistance and subsidizing insurance premiums. The goal of the study is to highlight policy options that are coherent in stabilizing income volatility while limiting distortions of public intervention. In this study, farmer incomes were first modelled using Monte Carlo simulation, and options were then ranked by applying the stochastic efficiency with respect to a function. The results suggest that, if catastrophic assistance is available, even higher insurance support is needed to make it a preferred option. The results highlight the fact that well defined and credible ex ante rules for the use of disaster assistance are essential to enable insurance markets to develop. One possibility would be to make a farmer's eligibility for disaster aid conditional on his or her participation in the insurance programmes.
AndersonJ.R.DillonJ.L.HardakerJ.B. (1977), Agricultural Decision Analysis, State University Press, Ames, IA.
2.
BarnettB.J.BlackJ.R.HuY.SkeesJ.R. (2005), ‘Is area yield insurance competitive with farm yield insurance?’Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Vol 30, No 2, pp 285–301.
3.
BergevoetR.H.van AsseldonkM.A.P.M.Bokma-BakkerM.DenormandieN.ElbersA.R.W.De KoeijerA.MarchotP.SaatkampH.W.SantiniN.WilkensE. (2011), Feasibility Study on the Revision of Council Decision 2009/470/EC (ex 90/424/EC) on Expenditure in the Veterinary Field with a View to Develop a Harmonized EU Framework for Cost and Responsibility Sharing Schemes for Animal Diseases, Directorate-General for Health and Consumers, European Union, Brussels.
4.
BielzaM.ConteC.G.PinillaGallego F.J.StroblmairJ.CatenaroR.DitmannC. (2009), Risk Management and Agricultural Insurance Schemes in Europe, JRC, European Commission, Brussels.
5.
COM (2008), Proposal for a Council Regulation Establishing Common Rules for Direct Support Schemes for Farmers under the Common Agricultural Policy and Establishing Certain Support Schemes for Farmers, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.
6.
COM (2011), Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Support for Rural Development by the European Fund for Rural Development, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.
7.
DuncanJ.MyersR.J. (2000), ‘Crop insurance under catastrophic risk’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 82, No 4, pp 842–855.
GoodwinB.K.VadoL.A. (2007), ‘Public responses to agricultural disasters: Rethinking the role of government’, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 55, No 4, pp 399–417.
10.
HardakerJ.B.HuirneR.B.M.AndersonJ.R.LienG. (2004), Coping with Risk in Agriculture, CABI, Wallingford.
11.
HennessyD.A.BabcockB.A.HayesD.J. (1997), ‘Budgetary and producer welfare effects of revenue insurance’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 79, pp 1024–1034.
12.
KoundouriP.LaukkanenM.MyyräS.NaugesC. (2009), ‘The effects of EU agricultural policy changes on farmers' risk attitudes’, European Review of Agricultural Economics, Vol 36, pp 53–77.
13.
LenceS. (2000), ‘Using consumption and asset return data to estimate farmers' time preferences and risk attitudes’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 82, pp 934–947.
14.
LienG.HardakerJ.B.van AsseldonkM.A.P.M.RichardsonJ.W. (2009), ‘Risk programming and sparse data: How to get more reliable results’, Agricultural Systems, Vol 101, Nos 1–2, pp 42–48.
15.
LienG.HardakerJ.B.van AsseldonkM.A.P.M.RichardsonJ.W. (2011), ‘Risk programming analysis with imperfect information’, Annals of Operations Research, Vol 190, No 1, pp 311–323.
16.
LinW.DeanG.W.MooreC.V. (1974), ‘An empirical test of utility vs. profit maximization in agriculture production’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 56, pp 497–508.
17.
MTT (2013), ‘Farm net income. EconomyDoctor FADN Standard Results’, website: www.mtt.fi/eufadn (last accessed 16 Ocrtober 2013).
18.
OECD (2009), Managing Risk in Agriculture: A Holistic Approach, OECD, Paris.
19.
OgurtsovV.A.Van AsseldonkM.A.P.M.HuirneR.B.M. (2008), ‘Assessing and modelling catastrophic risk perceptions and attitudes in agriculture: A review’, NJAS – Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, Vol 56, Nos 1–2, pp 39–58.
20.
SahaA.ShumwayC.R.TalpazH. (1994), ‘Joint estimation of risk preference structure and technology using expo-power utility’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 76, pp 173–184.
21.
SkeesJ.R. (1999), ‘Opportunities for improved efficiency in risk sharing using capital markets’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 81, No 5, pp 1228–1233.
22.
SkeesJ.R. (2000), ‘A role for capital markets in natural disasters: A piece of the food security puzzle’, Food Policy, Vol 25, No 3, pp 365–378.
23.
SkeesJ.R.BarnettB.J. (1999), ‘Conceptual and practical considerations for sharing catastrophic/systemic risks’, Review of Agricultural Economics, Vol 21, No 2, pp 424–441.
24.
van AsseldonkM.A.P.M.KobzarO.MeuwissenM.P.M.HuirneR.B.M.HardakerJ.B. (2005), ‘Market-based crop insurance appraisal using whole-farm planning’, in Proceedings of the 86th EAAE Seminar on Agricultural Income Stabilisation: What Role Should Public Policy Play? 21–22 October 2004, Anacapri, Italy, pp 409–417.
25.
van AsseldonkM.A.P.M.MeuwissenM.P.M.HuirneR.B.M. (2002), ‘Belief in disaster relief and the demand for a public–private insurance program’, Review of Agricultural Economics, Vol 24, No 1, pp 196–207.
26.
van AsseldonkM.A.P.M.MeuwissenM.P.M.HuirneR.B.M.WilkensE. (2006), ‘European public and private schemes indemnifying epidemic livestock losses: A review’, in KoontzS.R.HoagD.L.ThilmanyD.D.GreenJ.W.GrannisJ.L., eds, The Economics of Livestock Disease Insurance: Concepts, Issues and International Case Studies, CABI, Wallingford, pp 115–125.
