Size,Subsidies and Technical Efficiency in Renewable Energy Production: The Case of Austrian Biogas Plants

Abstract

This study estimates the efficiency of biogas plants and identifies determinants of inefficiencies. Data Envelopment Analysis is applied on a sample of 86 Austrian biogas plants for the year 2014, covering about one third of the installed electric capacity of Austrian biogas plants. We decompose technical efficiency into scale efficiency and pure technical efficiency (managerial efficiency). In a second-stage regression analysis the effects of subsidies and other variables on managerial efficiency are investigated. The main results are: i) 34% of biogas plants in our sample are technically efficient, 40% are scale efficient and 50% are managerial efficient; ii) small biogas plants (<100 kW) are scale inefficient exhibiting increasing returns to scale; iii) production subsidies show a significant, negative relationship to managerial efficiency. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that production subsidies provide a disincentive to managerial effort of plant operators.

Keywords

Data Envelopment Analysis pure technical efficiency scale efficiency returns to scale feed-in tariffs

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

(1999). “DEA in the ecological context: an overview.” In G. Westermann, ed., Data Envelopment Analysis in the Service Sector. Wiesbaden: Gabler, pp. 203-235. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1007/978-3-663-08343-6_11.

Asmild

Pastor

J.T.

(2010). “Slack free MEA and RDM with comprehensive efficiency measures.” Omega 38(6): 475-483. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2009.12.004.

BMLFUW (2004). Sonderrichtlinie fur die Umsetzung de. “Sonstigen Maβinahmen" des österreichischen Programms für die Entwicklung des ländlichen Raumes. Vienna: Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management (BMLFUW). Accessed March 24,2016. http://www.salzburg.gv.at/elnk-sonderrichtlinie_sonstige_ massnahmen.pdf.

Banker

Charnes

Cooper

W.W.

(1984). “Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data

envelopment analysis.” Management Science

30: 1078-1092. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078.

Bogetoft

Otto

(2011). Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

Braun

Laaber

Madlener

Brachtl

Kirchmayr

(2007). Aufbau eines Bewertungssystems fur Biogasanla-gen —. “Gütesiegel Biogas.” Tulln: Department of Agrobiotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences. Accessed March 24,2016. https://www.fcn.eonerc.rwth-aachen.de/global/show_document.asp?id=aaaaaaaaaahdapo.

Cameron

A.C

Trivedi

P.K.

(2005). Microeconometrics — methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Charnes

Cooper

W.W.

Rhodes

(1978). “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units.” European Journal of

10.

Operational Research 2: 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8.

11.

Chambers

R.G.

Chung

Y.H.

Fare

(1998). “Profit, Directional Distance Functions and Nerlovian Efficiency.” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 98: 351-364. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022637501082.

12.

Cook

W.D.

Tone

Zhu

(2014). “Data envelopment analysis: Prior to choosing a model.” Omega 44: 1-4. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2013.09.004.

13.

Datkov

Effenberger

(2010). “Data envelopment analysis for assessing the efficiency of biogas plants: capabilities and limitations.” Journal of Processing and Energy in Agriculture 14(1): 49-53. http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/1821-4487/2010/1821-44871001049D.pdf.

14.

Datkov

Effenberger

Lehner

Martinov

Tesic

Gronauer

(2012). “New method for assessing the performance of agricultural biogas plants.” Renewable Energy 40(1): 104-112. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.09.026.

15.

Datkov

Effenberger

Martinov

(2014). “Method for assessing and improving the efficiency of agricultural biogas plants based on fuzzy logic and expert systems.” Applied Energy 134: 163-175. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy. 2014.08.021.

16.

Dyckhoff

Allen

(2001). “Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA).” European Journal of Operational Research 132(2): 312-325. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00154-5.

17.

E-Control . Energie-Control Austria fur die Regulierung der Elektrizitäts- und Erdgaswirtschaft. Available from: http://ww-w.e-control.at/statistik, accessed 17 February 2016.

18.

Farrell

M.J.

(1957). “The measurement of productive efficiency.” Journal of Royal Statistical Society A. 120: 253-281. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2307/2343100.

19.

Fare

Grosskopf

Lovell

C.A.K.

(1985). The measurement of efficiency of production. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.

20.

Filler

Odening

Seeger

Hahn

(2007). “Zur Effizienz von ;Biogasanlagen.” Berichte über Landwirtschaft 85(2): 178-194. http://www.bmel.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/Service/BerichteLandwirtschaft/2007_Heft2_Band85.pdf? __blob=publicationFile

21.

Green

Yatchew

(2012). “Support schemes for Renewable Energy: An Economic Analysis.” Economics of Energy &Environmental Policy 1(2): 83-98. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.5547/2160-5890.1.2.6

22.

Haar

L.N.

Haar

(2017). “An Option Analysis of the European Union Renewable Energy Support Mechanism.” Economics of Energy &Environmental Policy 6(1): 131-147. https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.6.1.lhaa.

23.

Huber

P.J.

(1981). Robust Statistics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

24.

IEA (2016a). Renewables Information 2016. Paris: International Energy Agency.

25.

IEA (2016b). World Energy Outlook 2016. Paris: International Energy Agency.

26.

Kitzing

Mitchell

Morthorst

P.E.

(2012). “Renewable energy policies in Europe: Converging or diverging?” Energy Policy 51: 192-201. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.064.

27.

Klessmann

Held

Rathmann

Ragwitz

(2011). “Status and perspectives of renewable energy policy and deployment in the European Union-What is needed to reach the 2020 targets?” Energy Policy 39(12): 7637-7657. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.038.

28.

Latruffe

Minviel

J.J.

(2013). Explaining the impact of public subsidies on farm technical efficiency: Analytical challenges and Bayesian meta-analysis. Presented at 7. Journées de recherches en sciences sociales (JRSS), Angers, France. accessed February 9,2016. http://prodinra.inra.fr/record/274086.

29.

Madlener

Antunes

Dias

(2009). “Assessing the performance of biogas plants with multi-criteria and data envelopment analysis.” European Journal of Operational Research 14(3-4): 49-53. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.12.051.

30.

Martin

J.P.

Page

J.M.

Jr. (1983). “The impact of subsidies on X-efficiency in LDC industry: theory and an empirical test.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 65(4): 608-617. http://doi.org/10.2307/1935929.

31.

Portela

M.C.A.S.

Thanassoulis

Simpson

(2004). “Negative data in DEA: a directional distance function approach applied to bank branches.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 55(10): 1111-1121. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601768.

32.

Pöschl

Ward

Owende

(2010). “Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways.” Applied Energy 87(11): 3305-3321. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.05.011.

33.

Sahoo

B. K.

Luptacik

Mahlberg

(2011). “Alternative measures of environmental technology structure in DEA: An application.” European Journal of Operational Research 215: 750-762. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.07.017.

34.

Skovsgaard

Klinge Jacobsen

(2017). “Economies of scale in biogas production and the significance of flexible regulation.” Energy Policy 101: 77-89. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.021.

35.

Simões

Marques

R.C.

(2012). “On the economic performance of the waste sector. A literature review.” Journal of Environmental Management 106: 40-47. http://doi.org/10.1016/jjenvman.2012.04.005.

36.

Statistics Austria. Energy Balance

1970-2014; Vienna. accessed March 1,2016. http://www.statistik.at/web_de/statistiken/energie_umwelt_innovation_mobilitaet/energie_und_umwelt/energie/energiebilanzen/index.html.

37.

Tullock

(1980). “Efficient Rent Seeking.” In J.M. Buchanan, R.D. Tollison, G. Tollock, eds., Toward a Theory of the Rent Seeking Society. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, pp. 97-112.

38.

Walla

Schneeberger

(2008). “The optimal size for biogas plants.” Biomass and Bioenergy 32(6): 551-557. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.11.009.

39.

Wilson

P.W.

(1993). “Detecting Outliers in Deterministic Nonparametric Frontier Models with Multiple Outputs.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 11(3): 319-323. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2307/1391956.

40.

Wirth

Markard

Truffer

Rohracher

(2013). “Informal institutions matter: Professional culture and the development of biogas technology.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 8: 20-41. http://doi.org/10.1016j.eist.2013.06.002.

41.

World Bioenergy Association . Global Bioenergy Statistics 2016. accessed March 13,2017. http://www.worldbioenergy.org/uploads/WBA%20Global%20Bioenergy%20Statistics%202016.pdf.

42.

Zhang

Zhou

(2014). “Political connections, government subsidies and firm financial performance: Evidence from renewable energy manufacturing in China.” Renewable Energy 63: 330-336. http://doi.org/10.1016j.renene.2013.09.029.