This study investigated the factors behind the historical changes in CO2 emissions of the Japanese manufacturing industry as a whole and by sector at the prefectural level. We decomposed the changes of CO2 emissions in 47 prefectures from 1990 to 2013 into four factors (carbon intensity, energy intensity, structure, and activity effects) using the logarithmic mean Divisia index method. We found that energy intensity, structure, and activity effects were more influential in the changes of emissions than the carbon intensity effect, although the most influential factor varied by prefecture. Among the eight considered industrial sectors of Japan’s manufacturing industry, the changes in the chemistry and metal sectors were particularly complex. Thus, improvements of the energy intensity and production in these two sectors should be prioritized. We also conducted detailed analysis of the decomposed factors in three selected prefectures based on cluster analysis.
Agency for Natural Resources and Energy (2017a). Energy Consumption Statistics by Prefecture. http://www.enecho.meti.go.jp/statistics/energy_consumption/ec002/, July10, 2017.
2.
Agency for Natural Resources and Energy (2017b). Energy Statistics. http://www.enecho.meti.go.jp/statistics/total_energy/results.html,July10, 2017.
3.
AngB.W. (2005). “The LMDI Approach to Decomposition Analysis: A Practical Guide.” Energy Policy33(7): 867-871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.10.010.
4.
AngB.W. (2004). “Decomposition Analysis for Policymaking in Energy.” Energy Policy32(9): 1131-1139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00076-4.
5.
AngB.W. (2015). “LMDI Decomposition Approach: A Guide for Implementation.” Energy Policy86: 233-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.07.007.
6.
AngB.W.ChoiKi-Hong (1997). “Decomposition of Aggregate Energy and Gas Emission Intensities for Industry: A Refined Divisia Index Method.” The Energy Journal18(3): 59-73. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol18-No3-3.
7.
AngB.W.ChoiKi-Hong (2002). “Boundary Problem in Carbon Emission Decomposition.” Energy Policy30 (13): 1201-1205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00016-2.
8.
AngB.W.XuX.Y.SuBin (2015). “Multi-Country Comparisons of Energy Performance: The Index Decomposition Analysis Approach.” Energy Economics47: 68-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.10.011.
9.
AngB.W.ZhangF.Q.ChoiKi-Hong (1998). “Factorizing Changes in Energy and Environmental Indicators through Decomposition.” Energy23(6): 489-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-5442(98)00016-4.
10.
BhattacharyyaSubhes C.MatsumuraWataru (2010). “Changes in the GHG Emission Intensity in EU-15: Lessons from a Decomposition Analysis.” Energy35(8): 3315-3322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.04.017.
11.
Cabinet Office (2017). System of Prefectural Account. http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/jp/sna/sonota/kenmin/kenmin_top.html, March9, 2017.
12.
ChertowMarian R. (2000). “Industrial Symbiosis: Literature and Taxonomy.” Annual Review of Energy and Environment25: 313-337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.313.
13.
Chiba Prefecture (2014). Vision for Future Industrial Development of Chiba. https://www.pref.chiba.lg.jp/sanshin/keikaku/sangyoushinkou-bizyon.html, February 7, 2018 (in Japanese).
14.
Chiba Prefecture (2015a). Factor Analysis of CO2 Emissions from Major Sectors. https://www.pref.chiba.lg.jp/shigen/chikyuukankyou/documents/youinbunseki.pdf, February 7, 2018 (in Japanese).
15.
Chiba Prefecture (2015b). Performance of Plan for Global Warming Countermeasures of Chiba. https://www.pref.chiba.lg.jp/shigen/chikyuukankyou/documents/jisseki.pdf,February 7, 2018 (in Japanese).
16.
Chiba Prefecture (2016). New Strategies for Industrial Development of Chiba. https://www.pref.chiba.lg.jp/sanshin/keikaku/kankyouseikatsu/shin-mokuji/zenbun-mokuji.html, February 7, 2018 (in Japanese).
17.
CronerDaniel and IVan Frankovic (2018). “A Structural Decomposition Analysis of Global and National Energy Intensity Trends.” The Energy Journal39(2): 103-122.
18.
DiakoulakiD.MandarakaM. (2007). “Decomposition Analysis for Assessing the Progress in Decoupling Industrial Growth from CO2 Emissions in the EU Manufacturing Sector.” Energy Economics29(4): 636-664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2007.01.005.
19.
DongHuijuanOhnishiSatoshiFujitaTsuyoshiGengYongFujiiMinoruDongLiang (2014). “Achieving Carbon Emission Reduction through Industrial &Urban Symbiosis: A Case of Kawasaki.” Energy64, 277-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.11.005.
20.
E-konzal and Kiko Network (2016). Evaluation of GHG Emission Reduction Target Set by Prefectures in Japan: Gap between the national/2ଌ Target and Prefecture Targets. http://www.e-konzal.co.jp/news/regional-ghg-target-analysis.html, July 23, 2017 (in Japanese).
21.
Greenhouse Gas Inventory Office of Japan (2017). The GHG Emissions Data of Japan. http://www-gio.nies.go.jp/aboutghg/nir/nir-e.html,January31, 2018.
22.
Fernández González, P., M. Landajo, and M.J. Presno (2014a). “The Driving Forces behind Changes in CO2 Emission Levels in EU-27. Differences between Member States.” Environmental Science &Policy38: 11-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.10.007.
23.
Fernández González, P., M. Landajo, and M.J. Presno (2014b). “Tracking European Union CO2 Emissions through LMDI (Logarithmic-Mean Divisia Index) Decomposition. The Activity Revaluation Approach.” Energy73: 741-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.06.078.
24.
FilippiniMassimoHuntLaster C. (2006) “Energy Demand and Energy Efficiency in the OECD Countries: A Stochastic Demand Frontier Approach.” The Energy Journal32(2): 59-80.
25.
GaoWeijunFanLiyangUshifusaYoshiakiGuQunyinRenJianxing (2016). “Possibility and Challenge of Smart Community in Japan.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences216: 109-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.015.
26.
GreeningLorna A. (2004). “Effects of Human Behavior on Aggregate Carbon Intensity of Personal Transportation: Comparison of 10 OECD Countries for the Period 1970-1993.” Energy Economics26(1): 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2003.05.001.
27.
GrossiLuigiMussiniMauro (201). “Inequality in Energy Intensity in the EU-28: Evidence from a New Decomposition Method.” The Energy Journal38(4): 1-19.
28.
HenriquesSofia TeivesBorowieckiKarol J. (2017). “The Drivers of Long-Run CO2 Emissions in Europe, North America and Japan since 1800.” Energy Policy101: 537-549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.005.
29.
HuntingtonHillard G. (2010) “Structural Change and U.S. Energy Use: Recent Patterns.” The Energy Journal31(3): 25-40. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol31-No3-2.
30.
Ibaraki Prefecture (2017a). Action Plan for Global Warming Countermeasures of Ibaraki (March2017 Amendment). http://www.pref.ibaraki.jp/seikatsukankyo/kansei/chikyu/07keikaku-plan/gw-gw-plan.html, February 6, 2018 (in Japanese).
31.
Ibaraki Prefecture (2017b). Progress of Action Plan for Global Warming Countermeasures of Ibaraki (April2011). http://www.pref.ibaraki.jp/seikatsukankyo/kansei/chikyu/07keikaku-plan/documents/10shiryouhen2_sinchokujoukyou.pdf, February 6, 2018 (in Japanese).
32.
Japan Paper Association (2015). Energy Circumstances of Paper and Pulp Industry. https://www.jpa.gr.jp/file/re-lease/20151217040243-1.pdf, July 23, 2017 (in Japanese).
33.
JeongKyonghwaKimSuyi (2013). “LMDI Decomposition Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Korean Manufacturing Sector.” Energy Policy62: 1245-1253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.077.
34.
KumbaroğluGürkan (2011). “A Sectoral Decomposition Analysis of Turkish CO2 Emissions over 1990-2007.” Energy36(5): 2419-2433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.01.027.
35.
LiaskasK.MavrotasG.MandarakaM.DiakoulakiD. (2000). “Decomposition of Industrial CO2 Emissions: The Case of European Union” Energy Economics22(4): 383-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(99)00035-3.
36.
LuI.J.LinSue J.LewisCharles (2007). “Decomposition and Decoupling Effects of Carbon Dioxide Emission from Highway Transportation in Taiwan, Germany, Japan and South Korea.” Energy Policy35(6): 3226-3235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.11.003.
37.
LuoXiaoDongLiangDouYiLiYanLiuKaiRenJingzhengLiangHanweiMaiXianmin (2017). “Factor Decomposition Analysis and Causal Mechanism Investigation on Urban Transport CO2 Emissions: Comparative Study on Shanghai and Tokyo.” Energy Policy107: 658-668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.049.
38.
MallaSunil (2009). “CO2 Emissions from Electricity Generation in Seven Asia-Pacific and North American Countries: A Decomposition Analysis.” Energy Policy37(1): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.010.
39.
Ministry of the Environment (2015). About Eco-town. http://www.env.go.jp/recycle/ecotown/, February 5, 2018 (in Japanese).
40.
MetcalfGilbert E. (2008) “An Empirical Analysis of Energy Intensity and Its Determinants at the State Level.” The Energy Journal29(3): 1-26. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol29-No3-1.
41.
MoshiriSaeedDuahNana (2016) “Changes in Energy Intensity in Canada.” The Energy Journal37(4): 315-342. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.37.4.smos.
42.
MulderPeter (2015). “International Specialization, Sector Structure and the Evolution of Manufacturing Energy Intensity in OECD Countries.” The Energy Journal36(3): 111-136. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.36.3.pmul.
43.
Nihon Sanki Shimbun (2015). Industry Accumulation in Ibaraki. http://nihonsanki-shimbun.com/%E8%8C%A8%E5%9F%;8E%E7%9C%8C%E3%81%AB%E7%94%A3%E6%A5%AD%E9%9B%86%E7%A9%8D%E2%80%95%E7%89%B9 %E9%9B%86%E2%80%95/, February 6, 2018 (in Japanese).
44.
O’MahonyTadhgZhouPengSweeneyJohn (2012). “The Driving Forces of Change in Energy-Related CO2 Emissions in Ireland: A Multi-Sectoral Decomposition from 1990 to 2007.” Energy Policy44: 256-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.049.
45.
OkamotoShunsuke (2013). “Impacts of Growth of a Service Economy on CO2 Emissions: Japan’s Case.” Journal of Economic Structures2(1): 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-2409-2-8.
46.
OuyangXiaolingLinBoqiang (2015). “An Analysis of the Driving Forces of Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions in China’s Industrial Sector.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews45: 838-849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.030.
47.
Park, Hung.-Suck, Eldon R. Rene, Soo-Mi Choi, and Anthony S.F. Chiu (2008). “Strategies for Sustainable Development of Industrial Park in Ulsan, South Korea—From Spontaneous Evolution to Systematic Expansion of Industrial Symbiosis.” Journal of Environmental Management87: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.045.
48.
PaulShyamalNathRabindra Bhattacharya (2004). “CO2 Emission from Energy Use in India: A Decomposition Analysis.” Energy Policy32(5): 585-593. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00311-7.
49.
RenShenggangYinHongyuanChenXiaoHong (2014). “Using LMDI to Analyze the Decoupling of Carbon Dioxide Emissions by China’s Manufacturing Industry.” Environmental Development9: 61-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.en-vdev.2013.11.003.
50.
RoiniotiArgiroKoroneosChristopher (2017). “The Decomposition of CO2 Emissions from Energy Use in Greece before and during the Economic Crisis and Their Decoupling from Economic Growth.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews76: 448-459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.026.
51.
ShigetomiYosukeMatsumotoKen’ichiOgawaYukiShirakiHirotoYamamotoYukiOchiYukiEharaTomoki (2018). “Driving Forces Underlying Sub-national Carbon Dioxide Emissions within the Household Sector and Implications for the Paris Agreement Targets in Japan.” Applied Energy228: 2321-2332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.057.
52.
ShirakiHirotoAshinaShuichiKameyamaYasukoHashimotoSeijiFujitaTsuyoshi (2016). “Analysis of Optimal Locations for Power Stations and Their Impact on Industrial Symbiosis Planning under Transition toward Low-carbon Power Sector in Japan.” Journal of Cleaner Production114: 81-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.079.
53.
ShresthaRam M.AnandarajahGabrialLiyanageMigara H. (2009). “Factors Affecting CO2 Emission from the Power Sector of Selected Countries in Asia and the Pacific.” Energy Policy37(6): 2375-2384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.en-pol.2009.01.032.
54.
ShresthaRam M.TimilsinaGovinda R. (1996). “Factors Affecting CO2 Intensities of Power Sector in Asia: A Divisia Decomposition Analysis.” Energy Economics18(4): 283-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(96)00019-9.
55.
VoigtSebastianDe CianEnricaSchymuraMichaelVerdoliniElena (2014). “Energy Intensity Developments in 40 Major Economies: Structural Change or Technology Improvement?” Energy Economics41: 47-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.10.015.
56.
WangH.AngB.W.ZhouP. (2018). “Decomposing Aggregate CO2 Emission Changes with Heterogeneity: An Extended Production-Theoretical Approach.” The Energy Journal39(1): 59-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.112.
57.
WuJunnianQiHangWangRuiqi (2016). “Insight into Industrial Symbiosis and Carbon Metabolism from the Evolution of Iron and Steel Industrial Network.” Journal of Cleaner Production135: 251-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle-pro.2016.06.103.
58.
XuShi-ChunHeZheng-XiaLongRu-Yin (2014). “Factors that Influence Carbon Emissions due to Energy Consumption in China: Decomposition Analysis Using LMDI.” Applied Energy127: 182-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apen-ergy.2014.03.093.
59.
XuX.Y.AngB.W. (2013). “Index Decomposition Analysis Applied to CO2 Emission Studies.” Ecological Economics93: 313-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.06.007.
60.
XuX.Y.AngB.W. (2014). “Analysing Residential Energy Consumption Using Index Decomposition Analysis.” Applied Energy113: 342-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.07.052.
61.
YabeNobuko (2004). “An Analysis of CO2 Emissions of Japanese Industries during the Period between 1985 and 1995.” Energy Policy32(5): 595-610. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00312-9.
62.
ZhangYue-JunDaYa-Bin (2015). “The Decomposition of Energy-Related Carbon Emission and Its Decoupling with Economic Growth in China.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews41: 1255-1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.021.
