The historical development of deceased organ donation, transplantation, and organ procurement organizations is reviewed. The concept of transplantation, taking parts from one animal or person and putting them into another animal or person, is ancient. The development of organ transplantation brought on the need for a source of organs. Although many early kidney transplants used kidneys from living donors, these donors could not satisfy the ever-growing need for organs, and extrarenal organs were recovered only from deceased donors. This need for organs to satisfy the great demand led to specialized organizations to identify deceased donors, manage them until recovery occurred, and to notify transplant centers that organs were available for their patients. The functions of these organ procurement organizations expanded to include other required functions such as education, accounting, and compliance with state and federal requirements. Because of the shortage of organs relative to the demand, lack of a unified organ allocation system, the perception that organs are a national resource and should be governed by national regulations, and to improve results of organ procurement organizations and transplant centers, the federal government has regulated virtually all phases of organ procurement and transplantation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LindenPK. History of solid organ transplantation and organ donation. Crit Care Clin.2009;25(1):165–184.
2.
ShayanH. Organ transplantation: From myth to reality. J Invest Surg.2001;14(3):135–138.
3.
BerganA. Ancient myth, modern reality. A brief history of transplantation. J Biocommun.1997;24(4):2–9.
4.
TilneyNL. Transplant: From Myth to Reality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2003.
5.
ChickLR. Brief history and biology of skin grafting. Ann Plast Surg.1988;21(4):358–365.
6.
ZirmME. Eduard Konrad Zirm and the ‘wondrously beautiful little window’. Refract Corneal Surg.1989;5(4):256–257.
7.
NeuhoffH. The Transplantation of Tissues. New York, NY: D. Appleton and Company; 1923.
8.
VoronoffS. Rejuvenation by Grafting. London, England: George Allen & Unwin Ltd; 1925.
9.
VoronoyU. Sobre bloqueo del aparato reticuloendotelial del hombre an algunas formas de intoxicacion por el sublimado y sobre la transplantación del rinon cadaverico como metodo de tratamiento de la anuria consecutiiva a aquella intoxicación [Blocking the reticuloendothelial system in man in some forms of mercuric chloride intoxication and the transplantation of the cadaver kidney as a method of treatment for the anuria resulting from the intoxication]. Siglo Medico.1937;97: 296–297.
10.
HamiltonDNReidWA. Yu Yu Voronoy and the first human kidney allograft. Surg Gynecol Obstet.1984;159(3):289–294.
11.
DiethelmAG. Ethical decisions in the history of organ transplantation. Ann Surg.1990;211(5):505–520.
12.
HumeDMMerrillJPMillerBF. Experiences with renal homotransplantation in the human: Report of nine cases. J Clin Invest.1955;34(2):327–382.
13.
DeVitaMASnyderJVGrenvikA. History of organ donation by patients with cardiac death. Kennedy Inst Ethics J.1993;3(2): 113–129.
14.
MerrillJPMurrayJETakacsFJHagerEBWilsonREDamminGJ. Successful transplantation of kidney from a human cadaver. JAMA.1963;185:347–353.
15.
MachadoC. The first organ transplant from a brain-dead donor. Neurology.2005;64(11):1938–1942.
16.
HowardRJ. Organ donation: Social policy, ethical and legislative issues. In: RodrigueJR, ed. Biopsychosocial Perspectives on Transplantation. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2001:39–58.
17.
WertheimerPJouvetMDescotesJ. Diagnosis of death of the nervous system in comas with respiratory arrest treated by artificial respiration [in French]. Presse Med.1959;67(3):87–88.
18.
MollaretPGoulonM. Coma dépassé. Rev Neurol.1959;101: 3–15.
19.
Harvard Criteria Ad Hoc Committee. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death: A definition of irreversible coma. JAMA.1968;205:337–340.
20.
BernatJL. How can we achieve uniformity in brain death determinations?Neurology.2008;70(4):252–253.
21.
GreerDMVarelasPNHaqueSWijdicksEF. Variability of brain death determination guidelines in leading U.S. neurologic institutions. Neurology.2008;70(4):284–289.
22.
HowardRJScholdJDCornellDL. A 10-year analysis of organ donation after cardiac death in the United States. Transplantation.2005;80(5):564–568.
23.
MenikoffJ. The importance of being dead: Non-heart-beating organ donation. Issues Law Med.2002;18(1):3–20.
24.
DevitaMSnyderJV. Reflections on non-heartbeating organ donation: How 3 years of experience affected the University of Pittsburgh's Ethics Committee's actions. Camb Q Healthc Ethics.1996;5(2):285–292, 292–299.
25.
MillerFG. Death and organ donation: Back to the future. J Med Ethics.2009;35(10):616–620.
26.
Institute of Medicine. Non-heart-beating Organ Transplantation: Medical and Ethical Issues in Procurement. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1997.
27.
ShahSKMillerFG. Can we handle the truth? Legal fictions in the determination of death. Am J Law Med.2010;36(4): 540–585.
28.
IltisASCherryMJ. Death revisited: Rethinking death and the dead donor rule. J Med Philos.2010;35(3):223–241.
29.
ChoSIDerHagopianRPKraneRSNabsethDC. Regional organ preservation program in the New England area. Surgery.1974;75(4):528–534.
30.
McDonaldJC. Organ procurement and renal transplantation in Louisiana. J La State Med Soc.1975;127(3):81–84.
31.
WhelchelJDDiethelmAG. Current status of renal transplantation in Alabama and the role of the Alabama Organ Bank. Ala J Med Sci.1979;16(1):52–55.
32.
WilliamsMCCregerJHBeltonAM. The organ center of the United Network for Organ Sharing and twenty years of organ sharing in the United States. Transplantation.2004; 77(5):641–646.
33.
CollinsGMBravo-ShugarmanMTerasakiPI. Kidney preservation for transportation. Lancet.1969;294(7632): 1219–1222.
34.
SacksSAPetritschPHKaufmanJJ. The use of hyperosmolar perfusates in renal preservation. Transplant Proc.1974; 6(3):283–288.
35.
LeeHMHumeDMVredevoeDLMickeyMRTerasakiPI. Serotyping for homotransplantation. Evaluation of leukocyte antigen matching with the clinical course and rejection types. Transplantation.1967;5(4 suppl):1040–1045.
36.
BelzerFOAshbyBSGulyassyPFPowellM. Successful seventeen-hour preservation and transplantation of human-cadaver kidney. N Engl J Med.1968;278(11):608–610.
37.
TerasakiPIWilkinsonGMcClellandJ. National transplant communications network. JAMA.1971;218(11):1674–1678.
38.
RettigRA. The politics of organ transplantation: A parable of our time. J Health Politics Policy Law.1989;14(1):191–227.
39.
ProttasJM. The organization of organ procurement. J Health Politics Policy Law.1989;14(1):41–55.
40.
JohnsonHKBroznickBAShiresDL. Organ procurement organizations. In: PhillipsMG, ed. Organ Procurement, Preservation and Distribution in Transplantation. 2nd ed.Richmond, VA: United Network for Organ Sharing; 1996.
41.
ProttasJM. The organization of organ procurement. In: BlumsteinJFSloanFA, eds: Organ Transplantation Policy: Issues and Prospects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 1989:41–57.
