
Editorial
Select search scope: search across all journals or within the current journal


To support integration of occupational therapy in primary care and research in this area, it is critical to document examples of occupational therapy in primary care.
This study describes occupational therapy roles and models of practice used in primary care.
An electronic survey was sent to occupational therapists across Canada. Participants were identified using purposive and snowball sampling strategies. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data.
Respondents (
A growing number of occupational therapists are working in primary care providing a broad range of services across the life span.
Empirical studies on occupation as a determinant of health could be advanced with research incorporating biological measures of health. Telomere length and telomerase function are promising biomarkers of the interaction of genetics, lifestyle, and behaviour; however, they have not been used in occupational therapy research.
This paper reviews current evidence on the role of physical and mindfulness activities in sustaining telomeres. The findings are applied to the study of occupation, health, and aging.
A rapid review was conducted with an evidence synthesis of 23 studies published from 2008 to 2014.
Mindfulness activities may preserve telomeres, slow cell senescence and death, and sustain health through mediating life stressors. Inconsistencies exist for the effect of physical activities on telomeres.
Similar research examining a range of occupations may help to identify the health-promoting benefits of occupation and inform lifestyle interventions.
Plusieurs ergothérapeutes contribuent à l’évaluation de l’aptitude à prendre soin de sa personne et à gérer ses biens, mais peu de balises encadrent cette pratique auprès d’adultes ayant subi un traumatisme craniocérébral (TCC).
Cette étude explorait la contribution du Profil des activités instrumentales (PAI) à la documentation de l’aptitude suite à un TCC.
La réalisation des tâches du PAI par un homme de 46 ans (ML) ayant été déclaré inapte suite à un TCC sévère a été comparée à celle de huit participants témoins (âge moyen 49,3 ± 4,2 ans). Les scores au PAI, les comportements observables, et les verbalisations ont été comparés en utilisant des statistiques descriptives (moyennes et écarts-types) et des analyses qualitatives.
Le niveau d’indépendance de ML est inférieur à celui des témoins pour sept des huit tâches du PAI (
Le PAI pourrait être utilisé lors d’une évaluation fonctionnelle visant à documenter l’aptitude.

Chronic disease self-management is a priority in health care. Personal and environmental barriers for populations with neuromuscular disorders might diminish the efficacy of self-management programs, although they have been shown to be an effective intervention in many populations. Owing to their occupational expertise, occupational therapists might optimize self-management program interventions.
This study aimed to adapt the Stanford Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP) for people with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and assess its acceptability and feasibility in this population.
Using an adapted version of the Stanford CDSMP, a descriptive pilot study was conducted with 10 participants (five adults with DM1 and their caregivers). A semi-structured interview and questionnaires were used.
The Stanford CDSMP is acceptable and feasible for individuals with DM1. However, improvements are required, such as the involvement of occupational therapists to help foster concrete utilization of self-management strategies into day-to-day tasks using their expertise in enabling occupation.
Although adaptations are needed, the Stanford CDSMP remains a relevant intervention with populations requiring the application of self-management strategies.

Driver confidence can be measured through concepts such as driving frequency, situational avoidance, and self-perceptions. However, it is not clear how well confidence aligns with actual driving performance.
We examined the relationship between subjective measures of confidence in driving ability and on-road performance.
We report findings from two studies. The first compared scores from the Older and Wiser Driver Questionnaire to an on-road driving evaluation. The second looked at the Day and Night Driving Comfort Scales and Driving Habits and Intentions Questionnaire in relation to an on-road driving evaluation.
No measures of confidence in driving ability were related to on-road driving performance.
Confidence in driving ability bears little relationship to on-road performance. Future research should examine approaches to foster a better match between self-assessments and actual abilities among drivers.
We developed a reporting guideline to provide authors with guidance about what should be reported when writing a paper for publication in a scientific journal using a particular type of research design: the single-case experimental design. This report describes the methods used to develop the Single-Case Reporting guideline In BEhavioural interventions (SCRIBE) 2016. As a result of 2 online surveys and a 2-day meeting of experts, the SCRIBE 2016 checklist was developed, which is a set of 26 items that authors need to address when writing about single-case research. This article complements the more detailed SCRIBE 2016 Explanation and Elaboration article (Tate et al., 2016) that provides a rationale for each of the items and examples of adequate reporting from the literature. Both these resources will assist authors to prepare reports of single-case research with clarity, completeness, accuracy, and transparency. They will also provide journal reviewers and editors with a practical checklist against which such reports may be critically evaluated. We recommend that the SCRIBE 2016 is used by authors preparing manuscripts describing single-case research for publication, as well as journal reviewers and editors who are evaluating such manuscripts.
Reporting guidelines, such as the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Statement, improve the reporting of research in the medical literature (Turner et al., 2012). Many such guidelines exist and the CONSORT Extension to Nonpharmacological Trials (Boutron et al., 2008) provides suitable guidance for reporting between-groups intervention studies in the behavioral sciences. The CONSORT Extension for
