
Research article
Select search scope: search across all journals or within the current journal

Developing gene therapies involving gene editing is a rapidly evolving field with large potential implications for improving health for both rare and common diseases. Ensuring that these technologies are developed safely, efficiently, and fairly is essential. To better understand the ethical considerations and regulatory requirements and challenges with gene therapies involving gene editing that may advance precision health. Through a multistakeholder workshop and subsequent engagements, multiple ethical and regulatory barriers to developing and implementing gene therapies involving gene editing were identified. Eight major themes emerged that warrant careful consideration, including (1) objectives (treatment, risk reduction, and enhancement) for the intervention; (2) competing interests of safety, equity, and desire for research efficiencies; (3) unique aspects of gene editing related to rare and ultrarare genetic conditions; (4) considerations in the pediatric population; (5) regulatory requirements and ethics oversight; (6) challenges with long-term follow-up and data sharing; and (7) communication. To promote the safe, efficient development of gene therapies involving gene editing that will reach their full potential, all stakeholders will have to undertake an unprecedented degree of collaboration. However, this will be essential to ensure that these interventions are effective, ethically sound, and patient-centered.
Common variants of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene have a major impact on the risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Relative to homozygotes with the common E3 allele, the APOE4 variant (C112R) increases risk by 3.5-fold in E3/E4 heterozygotes and 15-fold in E4 homozygotes. Since the E3 and E4 alleles differ only by a single nucleotide, gene editing of E4 to E3 is a potential strategy to reduce AD risk in E4 homozygotes. Because the APOE pool in the brain is separate from systemic APOE, editing to treat AD would ideally be directed to the brain. Following
The recent evolution of oncolytic virotherapy has yielded viral platforms with enhanced tumor tropism and expanded engineering flexibility, thereby enabling not only direct oncolysis but also deliberate promotion of antitumor immune responses. Here, we systematically explore multiple insertion sites for calreticulin (CALR) within an oncolytic adenovirus, identifying the most optimal variant that exposes robust CALR on tumor cell membrane and functionally motivates macrophages in addition to directly mediating tumor cell lysis. Mechanistically, this variant incorporates a precise deletion within the
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells, created by gene editing systems along with recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV), provide a promising strategy for treating leukemia. rAAVs serve as a safe and effective donor template for homology-directed repair because they can avoid integrating into the host genome. However, only a few AAV serotypes can efficiently transduce human primary T cells at low multiplicities of infection (MOIs) with high packaging efficiency. To address this problem, variants derived from an AAV2 peptide library were screened in Jurkat cells and later validated in primary T cells. A high-ranking sequence identified outside the VR-VIII region, NNSKLTV, was discovered after three rounds of selection and was named Tot3. Tot3 demonstrated transduction efficiency similar to AAV2, but at a 27-fold lower MOI. In addition, Tot3 exhibited greater packaging efficiency and reduced thermal stability. Simultaneously, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) knockout and CAR overexpression were achieved in human primary T cells using Tot3, with knockout and knock-in efficiencies reaching up to 70% and 55%, respectively. These CAR-T cells demonstrated significantly enhanced antitumor activity and increased survival times in a mouse model of diffuse B cell lymphoma.
Mutations in the