Hand Therapy

The aim of this study was to evaluate the construct validity, floor and ceiling effects, data completeness and magnitude of change over time for the eight-item patient questionnaire (HQ-8) in the Swedish Healthcare Quality Registry for hand surgery (HAKIR).

Construct validity was investigated through predefined hypotheses and correlation statistics between the single items in HQ-8 (pain on load, pain on motion without load, pain at rest, stiffness, weakness, numbness, cold sensitivity and ability to perform daily activities) and QuickDASH. Floor and ceiling effects and data completeness were analysed at preoperative (n = 13,197), three months (n =10,702) and one year (n = 9,986) responses from hand surgery patients. Effect sizes were calculated for pre- and postoperative change scores in elective conditions and postoperative scores for acute conditions.

Correlation coefficients at pre, 3 and 12 months ranged from 0.44 to 0.79 in the total group. No ceiling effect occurred, but a floor effect for the total group was noted for all items at all follow-ups. Missing responses were < 2.6% except for cold sensitivity. The effect sizes varied from small to large for individual items in elective diagnoses. For acute injuries, small effect sizes were found.

This study provides evidence of construct validity of HQ-8, lack of ceiling effect, expected floor effect, good data completeness and an ability to detect changes over time. The results indicate that HQ-8 measures unique aspects of disability. The HQ-8 could complement the Quick-DASH in describing patient-reported outcomes after hand surgery.

For many patients, audio-visual appointments have provided a timely and efficient way of seeking advice, assessment and treatment for their hand injuries during the NHS response to COVID-19. This study aimed to explore the experience of hand units across the UK in determining the safe and judicious use of audio-visual outpatient care for the management of acute upper limb trauma.

An online cross-sectional survey was sent to the therapy leads of hand units across the UK. Questions focused on the experience of using audio-visual technology in the management of upper limb trauma, and the relevant factors in determining its appropriate use. A deductive mixed methods analysis was used to identify both common themes and capture community experience and characteristics.

A total of 51 out of 76 hand therapy units completed the survey; a response rate of 67%. Of these, 82% (42/51) reported using audio-visual technology to manage upper limb trauma during the UK COVID-19 lockdown. When determining patient suitability for audio-visual consultations, 73% (37/51) of respondents reported the use of COVID-19 guidelines, but only 35% (18/51) reported the use of a clinical decision-making tool. In agreement with our experience at Salisbury Hospital Foundation Trust, 92% (47/51) had concerns relating to the use of audio-visual care.

The choice of safely managed remote care or in-person consultation has, to date, largely relied on the discretion of the clinician. A carefully designed clinical decision-making tool for the management of upper limb trauma is needed for use both in clinical practice and in future service planning.

Compression gloves are frequently provided to patients with hand arthritis. Evidence for effectiveness is limited. The aim of this study was to determine feasibility of recruitment, assessment and treatment procedures, in preparation for a future compression glove trial.

A non-randomised feasibility study with out-patients with either undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or hand osteoarthritis, with moderate to severe hand pain. All received Isotoner™ compression gloves provided by rheumatology occupational therapists. The main outcomes were feasibility of recruitment, assessment and treatment procedures, trial outcome selection and sample size calculation. Participants were assessed at baseline and four weeks. Assessments included: numeric rating scales (0–10) of hand pain (on activity, at rest, at night) and stiffness; hand joint swelling; finger flexion; and hand function (Grip Ability Test).

Of 318 patients screened, 86/204 (42%) of inflammatory and 68/114 (60%) of hand osteoarthritis patients were eligible. Of these, 41 (48%: age: 59.10 (SD 12.54) years) and 32 (47%: age: 60.75 (SD 8.64) years) respectively, consented. All completed four-week follow-up. Assessment and treatment protocols were feasible. Hand pain on activity and at night, stiffness, joint swelling, finger flexion and hand function improved: e.g. hand pain on activity: inflammatory arthritis change = −0.95 (SD 2.26; p = 0.01); osteoarthritis −1.57 (SD 1.78; p = 0.001). Participants reported improved hand pain, stiffness and hand function as main benefits.

Procedures tested were feasible. The most relevant primary outcome was hand pain on activity. Future trials would need 161 participants (Inflammatory arthritis) and 151 (hand osteoarthritis).

Trial registration: Clinical Trials.Gov: NCT01874067