Language Testing

In the light of recent trends in educational assessment, language testing and the pedagogical discussion about new teacher roles, this article focuses on the skills and abilities required of a language teacher wishing to respond to these developments, with specific reference to the primary (elementary) foreign language classroom. A new concept is introduced ‘diagnostic competence’ defined as the ability to interpret foreign language growth in individual children. In order to arrive at this conceptualization, data from both systematic classroom observation (The Netherlands) and ethnographic studies (Germany) are used to identify and illustrate teachers’ diagnostic activities and processes. On the basis of this evidence, a preliminary description of levels and features of a teacher engaged in such activities is presented.

This article reports on a collaborative study involving ESL¹ teachers in an Australian English Language Centre as they work through some of their concerns about reliability and validity in their assessment practices. The focus of this article is on how teachers work with the Curriculum Standards Framework (CSF) as an assessment tool. The discussion focuses on issues relating to the limitations of the CSF and the way in which teachers engage with the CSF to produce a meaningful and accurate assessment reflective of their students’ progress. The teachers’ stories highlight how state-mandated assessment policies are translated into teacher assessment carried out in local educational contexts. Harré’s positioning theory (1999) is used as the framework for interpreting the epistemological authority of the teachers within the assessment exigencies of the education system.

A growing concern in teacher-based assessment, particularly in assessing English language development in high-stakes contexts, is our inadequate understanding of the means by which teachers make assessment decisions. This article adopts a sociocultural approach to report on the background and findings of a comparative study of ESL teachers’ assessment of written argument in the final years of secondary school in Australia and Hong Kong. Using verbal protocols, individual and group interviews and self-reports, the study explored the different assessment beliefs, attitudes and practices of teachers working with senior secondary Cantonese-speaking students acquiring English as a second language. The study found that the Australian teachers varied considerably in their approach to assessing student work with two somewhat conflicting assessment orientations revealed: the legalistic assessors who ‘ticked the boxes’ according to the published assessment guidelines and those assessors who relied much more on professional judgment. In Hong Kong, there was much more variability in the underlying assessment criteria with consensus reached through reference to community norms rather than explicit statements of performance. The article concludes that traditional notions of validity may need to be reconceptualized in high-stakes teacher-based assessment, with professional judgment, interaction and trust given much higher priority in the assessment process.

There is now widely recognized support for classroom-based formative teacher assessment of student performance as a pedagogically desirable approach to assessment which is capable of promoting learning. However, the highly localized and socially co-constructed nature of this type of assessment has raised conceptual and research issues that transcend the theoretical and epistemological concerns of the more established standardized language assessment. One such issue concerns the part played by classroom spoken discourse in the teaching-assessment interaction between teachers and students. This article argues that there is a need to develop theoretically informed research approaches to study how this type of assessment is accomplished through teacher-student discourse in the classroom. Using data collected in two multiethnic and multilingual elementary classrooms we present an analysis, drawing on systemic functional linguistics, to suggest an approach to empirical research and to discuss a number of teaching-learning and research methodological issues.

Student assessment plays a central and important role in teaching and learning. Teachers devote a large part of their preparation time to creating instruments and observation procedures, marking, recording, and synthesizing results in informal and formal reports in their daily teaching. A number of studies of the assessment practices used by teachers in regular school classrooms have been undertaken (e.g., Rogers, 1991; Wilson, 1998; 2000). In contrast, less is known about the assessment practices employed by instructors of English as a Second Language (ESL) and English as a Foreign Language (EFL), particularly at the tertiary level. This article reports a comparative survey conducted in ESL=EFL contexts represented by Canadian ESL, Hong Kong ESL=EFL, and Chinese EFL in which 267 ESL or EFL instructors participated, and documents the purposes, methods, and procedures of assessment in these three contexts. The findings demonstrate the complex and multifaceted roles that assessment plays in different teaching and learning settings. They also provide insights about the nature of assessment practices in relation to the ESL=EFL classroom teaching and learning at the tertiary level.

This article introduces the ideas of ‘assessment for learning’ as a means whereby teachers can make their classroom assessment more directly focused on learners’ development and can actively involve learners in this process. Current practice in classroom assessment in England is described and the thinking that has led to a new emphasis on formative practices outlined. This is set in the context of recent research studies that have been influential in changing not only classroom practice but also the ‘lead’ set by Government in promoting effective practice. Several examples of assessment strategies are offered to illustrate the principles involved. Conclusions are suggested that show how these ideas could make learning more effective and learners more involved.