The literature concerning local opposition to wind turbine developments has relatively few case studies exploring the felt impacts of people living with turbines in their daily lives. Aitken even suggests that such residents are subtly or overtly cast as deviants in the current literature. Our mixed-methods, grounded-theory case study of two communities in Ontario, Canada provides insights about such residents though twenty-six face-to-face in-depth interviews, 152 questionnaires, and basic spatial analysis involving locals who have been living with operating turbines for several years. Despite being neighbours the communities differ on several measures including the spatial clustering of turbines. Opposition is significantly predicted by: Health, siting process, economic benefits, and visual aesthetic variables. Though a majority supports the turbines we focus on the interplay of that majority with those experiencing negative impacts, particularly related to health. We highlight an asymmetry of impacts at the local level on those who oppose turbines, which is supported by rhetorical conflict at multiple scales. The findings point to the need for greater attention to mitigating impacts, including conflict, by understanding how siting policies interact with social processes at the local level.
AitkenM, 2010a, “Why we still don't understand the social aspects of wind power: A critique of key assumptions within the literature”Energy Policy381834–1841
2.
AitkenM, 2010b, “Wind power and community benefits: Challenges and opportunities”Energy Policy386066–6075
3.
AitkenMMcDonaldSStrachanP, 2008, “Locating ‘power’ in wind power planning processes: The (not so) influential role of local objectors”Journal of Environmental Planning and Management51777–799
BarryJEllisGRobinsonC, 2008, “Cool rationalities and hot air: A rhetorical approach to understanding debates on renewable energy”Global Environmental Politics867–98
6.
BaxterJ, 2006, “Place impacts of technological hazards: A case study of community conflict as outcome”Journal of Environmental Planning and Management49337–360
7.
BaxterJEylesJD, 1997, “Evaluating qualitative research in social geography: Establishing ‘rigour’ in interview analysis”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series22505–525
8.
BaxterJMorzariaRHirschR, 2013, “A case-control study of support/opposition to wind turbines: Perceptions of health risk, economic benefits, and community conflict”Energy Policy61931–943
9.
BellDGrayTHaggettC, 2005, “The ‘social gap’ in wind farm siting decisions: Explanations and policy responses”Environmental Politics14460–477
10.
BonnCLantC, 2009, “Welcoming the wind? Determinants of wind power development among U.S. states”The Professional Geographer6187–100
11.
BolingerM, 2005, “Making European-style community wind power development work in the US”Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews9556–575
12.
BrannstromCJepsonWPersonsN, 2011, “Social perspectives on wind-power development in West Texas”Annals of the Association of American Geographers101839–851
13.
BraunholtzS, 2003, Public Attitudes to Windfarms: A Survey of Local Residents in ScotlandMarket Opinion Research Institute, Edinburgh
14.
BreukersSWolsinkM, 2007, “Wind power implementation in changing institutional landscapes: An international comparison”Energy Policy352737–2750
15.
BurninghamK, 2000, “Using the language of NIMBY: A topic for research, not an activity for researchers”Local Environment555–67
CassNWalkerGDevine-WrightP, 2010, “Good neighbours, public relations, and bribes: The politics and perceptions of community benefit provision in renewable energy development in the UK”Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning12255–275
19.
ChapmanSSt. GeorgeAWallerKCakicV, 2013, “Spatio-temporal differences in the history of health and noise complaints about Australian wind farms: Evidence for the psychogenic, ‘communicated disease’ hypothesis”, University of Sydney eScholarship Repository
Devine-WrightP, 2005, “Beyond NIMBYism: Towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy”Wind Energy8125–139
24.
Devine-WrightPHowesY, 2010, “Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study”Journal of Environmental Psychology30271–280
25.
EllisGBarryJRobinsonC, 2007, “Many ways to say ‘no’, different ways to say ‘yes’: Applying Q-methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals”Environmental Planning and Management50517–551
26.
ElthamDHarrisonGAllenS, 2008, “Change in public attitudes towards a Cornish wind farm: Implications for planning”Energy Policy3623–33
GrossC, 2007, “Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance”Energy Policy352727–2736
31.
HaggettCTokeD, 2006, “Crossing the great divide-using multi-method analysis to understand opposition to windfarms”Public Administration84103–120
32.
HillSKnottJ, 2010, “Too close for comfort: Social controversies surrounding wind farm noise setback policies in Ontario”Renewable Energy Law and Policy2153–168
33.
HornerBJefferyRKroghC, 2011, “Literature reviews on wind turbines and health: Are they enough?”Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society31399–413
34.
Ipsos Reid, 2010, Wind Energy in Ontario (Ipsos Reid, Ontario)
35.
JobertALaborgnePMimlerS, 2007, “Local acceptance of wind energy: Factors of success identified in French and German case studies”Energy Policy352751–2760
KroghC, 2011, “Industrial wind turbine development and loss of social justice?”Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society31321–333
38.
KroghCGillisLKouwenNAraminiJ, 2011, “WindVOiCe, a self-reporting survey: Adverse health effects, industrial wind turbines, and the need for vigilance monitoring”Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society31334–345
39.
KrohnSDamborgS, 1999, “On public attitudes towards wind power”Renewable Energy16954–960
40.
McMurtryR, 2011, “Toward a case definition of adverse health effects in the environs of industrial wind turbines: Facilitating a clinical diagnosis”Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society31316–320
MurphyJSmithA, 2013, “Understanding transition–periphery dynamics: Renewable energy in the Highlands and Islands of Scotland”Environment and Planning A45691–709
43.
NissenbaumMAraminiJHanningC, 2012, “Effects of industrial wind turbine noise on sleep and health”Noise and Health60237–243
44.
Ontario Ministry of the Environment, 2008, Noise Guidelines for Wind Farms: Interpretation for Applying MOE NPC Publications to Wind Power Generation Facilities
PasqualettiM, 2011, “Opposing wind energy landscapes: A search for common cause”Annals of the Association of American Geographers101907–917
47.
PedersenELarsmanP, 2008, “The impact of visual factors on noise annoyance among people living in the vicinity of wind turbines”Journal of Environmental Psychology28379–389
48.
PedersenEWayeK Persson, 2004, “Perception and annoyance due to wind turbine noise-a dose–response relationship”Journal of the Acoustical Society of America1163460–3470
49.
PedersenEHallbergLWayeK, 2007, “Living in the vicinity of wind turbines-a grounded theory study”Qualitative Research in Psychology449–63
50.
PedersenEWayeK Persson, 2009, “Wind turbine noise, annoyance and self-reported health and well-being in different living environments”Occupational Environmental Medicine64480–486
51.
PedersenEvan den BergFBakkerRBoumaJ, 2009, “Response to noise from modern wind farms in The Netherlands”Journal of the Accoustical Society of America126634–643
52.
ShainM, 2011, “Public health ethics, legitimacy, and the challenges of industrial wind turbines: The case of Ontario, Canada”Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society31346–353
53.
ShepherdDMcBrideDWelchDDirksKHillE, 2011, “Evaluating the impact of wind turbine noise on health-related quality of life”Noise and Health13333–339
SwoffordJSlatteryM, 2010, “Public attitudes of wind energy in Texas: Local communities in close proximity to wind farms and their effect on decision-making”Energy Policy382508–2519
58.
TokeD, 2002, “Wind power in UK and Denmark: Can rational choice help explain different outcomes?”Environmental Politics1183–100
59.
WalkerG, 1995, “Renewable energy and the public”Land Use Policy1249–59
60.
WalkerGDevine-WrightP, 2008, “Community renewable energy: What does it mean?”Energy Policy36497–500
61.
WarrenCMcFadyenM, 2010, “Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland”Land Use Policy27204–213
62.
WolsinkM, 2000, “Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: Institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support”Renewable Energy2149–64
63.
WolsinkM, 2006, “Invalid theory impedes our understanding: A critique on the persistence of the language of NIMBY”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series3185–91
64.
WolsinkM, 2007, “Wind power implementation: The nature of public attitudes: Equity and fairness instead of ‘backyard motives’”Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews111188–1207
65.
ZoellnerJSchweizer-RiesPWemheuerC, 2008, “Public acceptance of renewable energies: Results from case studies in Germany”Energy Policy364136–4141
