Abstract
Abstract
Background:
Heart failure is characterized by recurrent decompensations and persistent symptoms that decrease quality of life. Shortness of breath and fatigue are commonly identified symptoms but there is limited data on pain in heart failure patients. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) was used to identify the prevalence and severity of pain and other symptoms experienced by patients with acute decompensated heart failure.
Methods:
This is a cross-sectional study that evaluated patients with a history of chronic heart failure admitted to the hospital with acute decompensated heart failure. A standardized questionnaire (ESAS) was administered to patients within 24 hours of hospital admission. Exclusion criteria included patients <18 years of age, admission for a noncardiac reason, active malignancy, history of chronic pain, outpatient chronic pain medication use, and those actively followed by the palliative care service.
Results:
One hundred patients, 67 males, with a mean age of 58±17 years were recruited. The mean ejection fraction (EF) was 37%±18%. Sixty patients (60%) reported pain of any degree. Patients with lower EF (≤40%, n=61) reported significantly higher pain scores (4.1±3.6) compared to patients with higher EF (>40%, n=36, 2.7±3.4, p<0.05). Tiredness, shortness of breath, and decreased well-being were the most severe symptoms with mean scores of 6.3±2.8, 6.1±3.1, and 5.7±2.6, respectively.
Conclusion:
Pain is a common, underrecognized symptom in patients with chronic but acute decompensated heart failure. Decreased well-being, shortness of breath, and tiredness are the most common and severe symptoms in patients with chronic heart failure, regardless of ejection fraction.
Introduction
Methods
Study population
This is a cross-sectional analysis performed at a single tertiary care center. Eligible for participation were patients 18 years of age and older with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV symptoms with a primary diagnosis of acute-on-chronic decompensated HF requiring hospital admission. Also required were written informed consent; fluency in the English language; and the mental capacity to read, understand, and respond to the questionnaire. Exclusion criteria included admission for a noncardiac reason, active malignancy, history of chronic pain syndromes, outpatient chronic pain medication use, and patients followed by the palliative care service.
Data collection
Eligible patients were recruited within 24 hours of admission and were provided with the ESAS questionnaire after informed consent was obtained. The study was explained in detail by a clinician who was not directly involved in their care. The questionnaire was only given to patients whom the clinician felt to be hemodynamically stable. A total of 100 patients were enrolled between April and November 2011. The ESAS questionnaire, previously recommended and used as a tool to measure symptoms in HF patients,10,11 was used to assess the presence and severity of nine different symptoms: pain, tiredness, nausea, depressed mood, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, well-being, and shortness of breath. The ESAS uses a scale of 0, no symptoms, to 10, worst possible symptoms. It also provides an outline of the body, allowing patients to identify the location of their pain. Patients were then divided into two groups for analysis based on ejection fraction (EF): Group 1, EF>40% and Group 2, EF≤40%. A cutoff of 40% has been previously used as a marker for preserved versus reduced ejection fraction.12,13
Statistical analysis
Data from the ESAS questionnaire was used to calculate the mean values with standard deviations for each of the nine items on the questionnaire. The independent student t-test was used to compare the two groups. A p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
One hundred seven patients were contacted after hospital admission; 7 patients refused to participate. Of the 100 patients recruited and analyzed, the mean age was 58±17 years range (22–87 years) with a mean EF of 37±18% (Table 1). Group 1 (EF>40%) consisted of 36 patients, 23 males, with a mean age of 58±15 years. Group 2 (EF ≤40%) consisted of 61 patients, 43 males, with a mean age of 58±17 years. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus, statin use, peripheral neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, and patients on hemodialysis was similar between groups.
EF data was not available for three patients.
EF, ejection fraction; SD, standard deviation.
Pain
Sixty patients (60%) reported some pain, i.e., pain >0 on the symptom scale. The mean pain score was 3.6±3.6 with a median of 3 (Table 2). Data on the location of pain were available for 36 patients. The most common location of pain was the legs, reported by eight patients. Shoulders and back were other commonly reported locations with six and five patients, respectively. Other locations identified included chest and stomach.
From ESAS questionnaire; each symptom has 0–10 scale, 0=no symptoms and 10=worst possible symptoms.
EF>40 versus EF≤40 group; P-value<0.05 considered statistically significant.
Other symptoms
Decreased well-being (95%), tiredness (94%), and shortness of breath (91%) were the most commonly reported symptoms among all patients. They were also the most severe symptoms, with mean scores 5.7±2.6, 6.3±2.8, and 6.1±3.1, respectively. The least prevalent symptoms were nausea (39%) and depression (45%).
Ejection fraction
The mean EF in group 1 was 58±8% compared to 25±7% in patients in group 2, p<0.05. The mean age and gender distribution was similar for both groups. The prevalence of pain was similar between the two groups, and was reported by 58% of patients in group 1 and by 62% of patients in group 2. However, the severity of pain was significantly higher in group 2 with a mean score of 4.1±3.6 versus 2.7±3.4 in group 1, p<0.05. There were no other significant differences between the two groups with regard to the prevalence or severity of other symptoms.
Discussion
The prevalence and severity of pain and other symptoms was evaluated using a standardized and validated questionnaire (ESAS) for symptom assessment in 100 hospitalized patients with acute-on-chronic decompensated HF. Pain was reported by 60% of patients and was more severe in patients with a reduced EF. Shortness of breath, tiredness, and decreased well-being were the most prevalent and severe symptoms in all patients, regardless of EF.
There is limited data on the prevalence and severity of pain in HF patients hospitalized with decompensated HF. Data from outpatient studies suggest that two-thirds of HF patients with an EF<40% experienced pain, and the severity worsened with higher NYHA classification. 14 A study of 96 veterans in the ambulatory setting reported that 55% of patients experienced pain and 37% had moderate to severe pain. Pain was reported more frequently than dyspnea. 15 In addition, a recent study using the visual analog scale on pain in patients with chronic heart failure found comparable results to our ESAS pain scores. 3
The etiology and pathogenesis of pain in HF is not well understood. 16 Pain experienced by HF patients is likely due to a combination of mechanisms, including nociceptive, neuropathic, psychogenic, idiopathic, and mixed. In addition, a more severe degree of fluid overload with pulmonary or generalized congestion might increase capillary and tissue pressure leading to mitochondrial dysfunction, 17 cellular swelling, lactate production, and ischemia. Likewise, increased production of free radicals may induce focal or generalized tissue damage with immune and inflammatory responses possibly contributing to pain syndromes. 18
Our results reinforce prior available data that pain is a prevalent symptom in patients with HF. Pain therapy, however, has not evolved as an established management tool for the treatment of patients with HF. Typical therapies including nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs for arthritis are generally avoided in HF, as they can impair renal function and worsen HF. 19 Opioids have been suggested for use as first-line agents for moderate to severe pain. 20 Without knowledge of the mechanisms and etiology of pain in HF patients, optimal pain management will not be achieved. This might be one reason why pain in general is undertreated in HF patients.15, 21
Patients followed by our palliative care service were excluded from the study, as they presumably had better symptom management on tailored therapy and as a result may have reported lower values on the ESAS questionnaire. We do not suspect for two reasons that this patient population is different from those not followed by the palliative care team. Firstly, this may reflect the fact that these patients were amenable to palliative care consultation, while others were offered and declined the consultation. Secondly, palliative care consultation may reflect the preferences of an individual cardiologist and not necessarily a specific subset of patients.
While it is common knowledge that HF patients experience shortness of breath and fatigue, we suggest that pain needs to be further assessed and characterized, as a significant portion of patients hospitalized with decompensated HF have pain.15,16,21,22 Specifically, further assessment behind the mechanism and location of pain is needed to better characterize and understand HF as a syndrome. We propose that patients with chronic heart failure admitted with acute decompensated HF should be screened for pain upon hospital admission, as pain contributes to the decreased quality of life in these patients.5,6,14 Pain can be treated by the primary team; however, if a palliative care service is available, patients may benefit from the symptom tailored therapy that a palliative care team provides.
Limitations
We do not have data on the baseline severity of symptoms in the ambulatory setting, which would help assess changes in severity of symptoms during acute decompensations. Only 60% of patients who reported pain also reported the location of their pain, although this may help support the thought that these patients have generalized pain associated with the syndrome of HF. Patient functional status and mobility were not assessed, and thus their impact on pain is unknown. In addition, a cognitive assessment was not done, and those with significant cognitive impairment may have reported higher pain scores. A multivariate analysis was not done to see if any of the comorbid conditions are confounding our results.
Conclusions
Pain is a common, underrecognized symptom in patients with acute-on-chronic decompensated heart failure. The severity of pain seems to increase with a reduced EF. Decreased well-being, shortness of breath, and tiredness are the most common and severe symptoms, regardless of ejection fraction. Further studies need to be done to better understand the etiology, mechanism, and management of pain in HF patients.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
The institutional review board at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center approved this study.
Author Disclosure Statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
