Abstract
Abstract
Background:
Preparedness to initiate end-of-life (EoL) discussions is a confronting and daunting task for all healthcare professionals. We conducted a group interview to explore healthcare professionals' experiences of preparing for EoL discussions with the patient and their family in a pediatric context.
Aim:
To identify what pediatric healthcare professionals consider important when preparing for an EoL discussion.
Methods:
A qualitative design using a group interview. Two open-ended questions were asked: (1) How could preparedness to initiate EoL care discussions between healthcare professionals and the patient and family be enhanced? (2) What education resources/strategies could be developed to support preparation for EoL care discussions?
Setting/Subjects:
Healthcare professionals, including medical, nursing, and allied health professionals working in pediatric palliative care settings across Queensland, Australia. These settings included major tertiary hospitals, general practice, community, and nongovernment organizations. A convenience sample of 36 healthcare professionals consented to participate in the study.
Results:
An analysis of the data identified seven themes that had relevance for preparing for an EoL discussion: communication, healthcare professional perspectives, interdisciplinary team role, patient and family perspectives, practical issues, addressing mistakes, and healthcare professional education.
Conclusions:
Pediatric healthcare professionals confirmed that gaps exist in preparing for an EoL discussion. The findings support a need for further research in two areas. First, a systematic review of interdisciplinary resources that are available to support healthcare professionals in preparing for EoL discussions is recommended. Second, evidence-based interdisciplinary interventions to support pediatric EoL discussions need to be developed and evaluated.
Introduction
P
Communicating with patients and their family is at the heart of the EoL discussion and must recognize and support the needs of patients and their families and health professionals.3,4 Recent work related to pediatrics and young people, including the “End of life planning series” 5 and “Difficult Conversations,” 6 provides information on preparation for EoL care discussions. Information written for patients and families is shown to be useful for both healthcare professionals and families in preparing for EoL discussions.1,7 For example, a review of a written resource “Caring Decisions” showed that written resources could be of significant benefit to both parents and clinicians.7,8 The use of specific clinical tools, which draw together the key principles of guidelines, has also been shown to assist palliative care provision.9–11 However, many existing tools are focused on clinical interventions, for example, pain management, quality of life, and EoL decision making, rather than on supporting pediatric healthcare professionals to prepare for EoL discussions. Although elements for preparing pediatric EoL discussions are discussed in the literature, healthcare professionals anecdotally report difficulty in practice. Furthermore, there is paucity in published literature describing the preparation for EoL discussions. Uncertainty in preparing for EoL discussions is compounded by a lack of targeted research addressing the efficacy of preparation interventions. The aim of this exploratory study was to identify what pediatric healthcare professionals consider important when preparing for an EoL discussion.
Methods
A qualitative design, using a group interview, was adopted to elicit healthcare professionals' experiences and opinions regarding the preparation for EoL discussions. Two questions framed the interview: (1) How could preparedness to initiate EoL care discussions between healthcare professionals and the patient and family be enhanced? (2) What education resources/strategies could be developed to support the initiation of EoL care discussions? The study was approved by the local Human Research Ethics Committee (A/15/688).
The study target population comprised specialist healthcare professionals, including medical, nursing, and allied health professionals working in pediatric palliative care settings across the State of Queensland, Australia. Settings included major tertiary hospitals, general practice, community, and nongovernment organizations. Eighty-five healthcare professionals attending a two-day Pediatric Palliative Care Education Workshop in May 2015 were invited to participate in a group interview. Potential participants were informed about the plan for an EoL discussion through the workshop program, and they were provided with written study information and a face-to-face briefing on day 1 of the workshop. A convenience sample of 36 healthcare professionals voluntarily consented to participate in the group interview that was scheduled on day 2 of the workshop.
The group interview was conducted over 35 minutes, and the data were collected by using a secure electronic application, which supported a digital “wall” that was projected during the interview. A secure link to this application was provided to all participants to use on their personal mobile devices; the link was disabled after the interview. The interview scribe posted real-time summary notes onto the digital wall during the interview. All participants could anonymously post comments during the discussion. The digital wall allowed all participants to continuously view all comments being posted as the interview progressed. Participants were invited to send any further comments regarding this information to the study team; no further comments were received.
After the interview, the data were electronically exported into a PDF file for data analysis. A descriptive content analysis was conducted to identify and describe the main content of the interview data; themes were derived from the data. 12 Study participants were provided with a summary of the findings and were encouraged to discuss any queries with any member of the study team. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) informed the reporting of this study. 13
Results
Participants were asked two research questions in the interview; these questions supported wide discussion. Thirty-four comments were posted during the interview. Typically, these comments were short statements. The scribe's comments, summarizing key points of the group discussion, were more extensively reported. An analysis of the data identified seven themes that had relevance for preparing for an EoL discussion: communication, healthcare professional perspectives, interdisciplinary team role, patient and family perspectives, practical issues, addressing mistakes, and healthcare professional education. Key themes, illustrated by examples of anonymous comments, are presented in Table 1.
EoL, end of life.
Discussion
Seven themes were identified as important when preparing for EoL discussions. These themes were generally discussed as both enablers and barriers; they were identified as barriers if they were not included for discussion in the EoL preparation. The themes were mapped to prompts in the “End of Life Planning Series” published by Together for Short Lives. 5 This series addresses practice for healthcare professionals from care before death through to bereavement support and provided a contemporary benchmark for our work.
Table 2 given next compares each study theme with related information for practice in the “End of Life Planning Series.” 5 For example; our study concept of acknowledging anxiety (Theme 2—Health professional perspectives) is aligned to the specific prompt “Work through your own reaction to the news before preparing yourself to share this with someone else–put aside your own “baggage” and personal feelings.” 5 Only one theme—addressing mistakes—and two concepts from the communication theme—cultural awareness, managing conflict—could not be mapped to the prompts.
The related prompt sheet is italicized.
Although the majority of results could be aligned with previous work, the connectedness of the themes requires further consideration. Addressing mistakes is an important theme to consider and though influencing an EoL discussion, this topic could be considered a unique focus for further work. Importantly, two concepts in the communication theme—cultural awareness and managing conflict—also need further exploration. The theme interdisciplinary team role can be considered to be at the center of exploring the preparation of the EoL discussion. The theme healthcare professional education is a foundation for continually developing the interdisciplinary EoL discussion practice. The remaining four themes, communication, healthcare professional perspectives, patient and family perspectives, and practical issues, are important input requirements for supporting the preparation for an EoL discussion.
Strengths and limitations
The strength of this exploratory study is that the study sample achieved interdisciplinary representation comprising clinicians working across a range of tertiary and regional services in Queensland. A potential limitation of the study is that not all participants spoke in the interview; however, anonymous posting of comments ensured that all participants were able to have their opinions included. Results are limited to the experiences of clinicians working in palliative care services in one Australian state, and it cannot be confirmed that the data were saturated. However, results also showed that responses from these clinicians could be mapped to most of the key prompts contained in the “End-of-Life Planning Series.” 5
Conclusion
Our study aim was to identify the areas that pediatric healthcare professionals considered important when preparing for an EoL care discussion with the patients and their families. Pediatric healthcare professionals confirmed that gaps exist in preparing for an EoL discussion. The findings support a need for further research in two areas. First, a systematic review of interdisciplinary resources that are available to support healthcare professionals in preparing for EoL discussions is recommended. Second, evidence-based interdisciplinary interventions to support pediatric EoL discussions need to be developed and evaluated. This work would potentially support healthcare professionals whose practice involves confronting and difficult EoL discussions with children or adolescents with a life-limiting illness.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge the pediatric healthcare professionals who attended the Pediatric Palliative Care Education workshop held on May 17, 2015 at the Lady Cilento Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, for their contributions. They extend their gratitude to Katrina McNamara, Director of Service Development and Improvement, Together for Short Lives, for reviewing the interpretation of the work, Together for Short Lives: End of Life Planning Series, in this article.
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
