Abstract
Abstract
Background:
Many patients who are in the last phase of life use multiple medications that are continued until shortly before they ultimately die. Little is known about physicians' opinions and experiences regarding medication discontinuation at the end of patients' lives.
Objective:
To explore physicians' opinions and experiences regarding medication discontinuation during the last phase of life, and to identify factors influencing the continuation of potentially inappropriate medications.
Design:
Questionnaire study, including a vignette and several statements.
Setting/Subjects:
A random sample of general practitioners and clinical specialists working in three regions in the Netherlands that represent more than half of the Dutch population.
Results:
Questionnaires were returned by 321 physicians (response rate: 37%). The majority of them (73%) agreed with the statement that patients who are in the last phase of life use too many medications. When presented with a vignette of a patient with end-stage COPD with different limited life expectancies, preventive medications would be stopped right early before death. Medications to relieve symptoms would not be stopped or stopped right before death. For medications to treat (chronic) illnesses, there was a huge interphysician variability. All statements about possible reasons why medications are continued in the last phase of life, for example, patients feeling abandoned and lack of time, were agreed upon by a small minority of respondents.
Conclusions:
Although physicians agree that patients use too many medications at the end of life, they quite regularly seem to give patients medications for chronic diseases, for which the benefit at the end of life may be debatable. More scientific evidence on whether or not these types of medication might be discontinued in the last phase of life is needed.
Introduction
M
There is increasing awareness that medications at the end of life should be reconsidered.11,12 The scarce literature on medication discontinuation in the final phase of life suggests that when a patient has a life expectancy of only months to weeks, physicians should especially reconsider medications that are not aimed at symptom relief.12,13 However, the clinical effects of the discontinuation of many PIMs are not well known.11,14
There is little information about physicians' opinions regarding medication discontinuation at the end of patients' lives. In a previous interview study we identified several reasons why physicians may fail to stop PIMs, including lack of priority and fear of negative medical consequences. 15 Until now, there is a lack of generalizable quantitative data about the opinions of physicians regarding medication discontinuation in the last phase of life.
The purpose of this study was to determine physicians' opinions on and experiences with medication discontinuation during the final phase of life, and to identify factors influencing the continuation of PIMs at the end of a patient's life.
Materials and Methods
Study design and participants
We conducted a questionnaire study among general practitioners and clinical specialists. We randomly selected physicians from a database (Cegedim) of addresses of physicians. Eligibility criteria were:
physicians working in the region of Amsterdam, Nijmegen, or Rotterdam. These regions represent more than half of the Dutch population; physicians working as general practitioners or as clinical specialists in geriatrics, cardiology, pulmonology, medical oncology, or neurology.
The selection contained 500 general practitioners and 100 physicians from each clinical specialty. The invitation letters and paper questionnaires were sent in May 2014. A web-based reminder was sent by e-mail to nonrespondents. Recruitment was completed in February 2015.
Questionnaire
We developed a questionnaire based on insights from a literature search on this topic. The questionnaire consisted of three sections. Section one included questions on the respondents' characteristics. Section two included a vignette about a patient with multimorbidity (Box 1). In the first part of the vignette, the patient's life expectancy was unspecified; subsequently it was added that the patient's life expectancy was three months and one week, respectively. For each situation, respondents were asked whether or not they would discontinue medication, and, if yes, which types of medication. Respondents were invited to comment on their answer. Section three of the questionnaire comprised several statements about medication discontinuation for patients with a life expectancy of three months or less. Respondents were asked whether they agreed with each statement on a 5-point Likert scale: strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, and strongly agree.
Mrs. Bruin is an 88-year-old woman with COPD Gold stage III–IV. A week ago she came back from hospital, where she had been treated for an exacerbation of her COPD, the third admission within two months. In addition to COPD, her medical history includes a cerebrovascular accident (two years earlier), hypertension, diabetes mellitus type 2, and severe arthralgia. During the most recent hospital admission she was also diagnosed with deep venous thrombosis in her left lower leg. Besides shortness of breath, she has no other complaints. Her blood pressure is 135/70 mmHg and her blood glucose level is 6.2 mmol/L (112 mg/dL).
Her medication list includes salmeterol/fluticasone 50/500 μg BID one inhalation; prednisolone QD 5 mg; enalapril QD 20 mg; hydrochlorothiazide QD 12.5 mg; metformin TID 500 mg; paracetamol TID 1000 mg; simvastatin QD 40 mg; carbasalate calcium QD 100 mg; omeprazole QD 40 mg; acenocoumarol.
We coded the questionnaires to guarantee anonymity. The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Review Committee from the VU University Medical Center.
Statistical analyses
Frequencies, proportions, and mean with standard deviations were calculated where appropriate. To examine differences between subgroups we used chi-square tests and McNemar's test. p Values of less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. We recoded responses to the statements into disagree, neutral, and agree. We used the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), version 24.0, for all analyses.
Results
Respondent characteristics
In total, 122 of the selected physicians had retired from working, did not work as a physician, or could not be reached because the right contact address was lacking. The final sample therefore included 878 physicians. Three hundred twenty-one physicians completed the questionnaire, resulting in a response rate of 37%. Of these physicians, 174 (54%) were general practitioners and 147 (46%) were clinical specialists (Table 1).
Missing values range from 1 to 10 physicians.
Vignette
Table 2 shows the preferences of respondents with regard to the discontinuation of medications for the patient presented in the vignette. For patients with a limited but unspecified life expectancy, a majority of respondents preferred stopping the cholesterol-inhibiting drug (simvastatin) (71%) and the anticlotting drug (carbasalate calcium) (62%). Most frequently mentioned reasons to stop cholesterol-inhibiting drugs were medical futility because of the patient's limited life expectancy and potential side effects of the medication.
McNemar.
Comparison between uncertain life expectancy with life expectancy of three months.
One missing value.
Comparison between life expectancy of three months versus one week.
When the life expectancy of the patient was stated to be about three months, 90% of the respondents preferred stopping the cholesterol inhibitor and 74% preferred stopping the anticlotting drug. In addition, antihypertensive treatment (enalapril and/or hydrochlorothiazide) would be stopped by 70% of the respondents, 26% would stop anticoagulant therapy (acenocoumarol). Most frequently mentioned reasons to discontinue enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide or acenocoumarol were medical futility because of the patient's limited life expectancy and potential side effects of the medications. Another reason to discontinue enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide was that the patient's blood pressure was already low enough.
When the patient's life expectancy was stated to be limited to one week, the physicians preferred stopping the majority of medications. The most frequently mentioned reason to stop medications in case of a life expectancy of one week of life was that they would not contribute to improved quality of life.
Statements about medication discontinuation in the last phase of life
The majority of the respondents (73%) agreed with the statement that patients who are in the last phase of life use too many medications (Table 3). In addition, most of the respondents (79%) agreed that patients' views about possible discontinuation of drugs that are no longer medically necessary are very important to them.
Missing values range from 0 to 5 physicians (0.0%–1.6%).
All statements concern patients with a life expectancy of less than three months.
Experiences with medication discontinuation in the last phase of life
In Table 4, respondents' experiences with medication discontinuation in patients with a limited life expectancy are presented. Virtually all respondents stated that they regularly check if symptom treatment is still adequate for patients in the last phase of life (96%); about 80% stated that they regularly check which drugs may be discontinued.
Missing values range from 2 to 28 physicians (0.6% to 8.7%).
All statements below devote to patients with a limited life expectancy (i.e., less than three months).
All statements about possible reasons why medications are continued in the last phase of life were agreed upon by a small minority of respondents.
Discussion
The results of our study suggest that physicians believe that patients use too many medications at the end of life. In a vignette of a patient with a limited life expectancy many physicians preferred stopping medications, particularly preventive medications. However, preferences varied widely: some physicians indicated that they would continue some medications for which potential disadvantages may outweigh the benefits regarding patient's limited life expectancy.
Discontinuing medications in a vignette
We found that in a vignette, physicians preferred stopping several medications if the patient's life expectancy was limited, which is in line with recommendations for medication discontinuation in the final phase of life.11,12 The vignette made clear that there are roughly three groups of medications that would be stopped at different times before death. First, preventive medications, for example, statins, which would be stopped relatively early. Second, medications patients frequently use for a long time to treat (chronic) illnesses, for example, metformin and enalapril. We found a huge interphysician variability in preferences regarding if and when such medications should be stopped. Third, medications that are prescribed to alleviate symptoms. Physicians preferred not stopping these medications or to stop them right before death. Especially for the second type of medication, more scientific evidence on whether or not they might be discontinued is needed. Until now, physicians have to rely on a handful of so-called implicit criteria that state if and when medications should be reconsidered, based on, for example, their potential benefit compared with the risk of current or future harm.12,13 In addition to such implicit guidelines, an expert opinion-based guideline is available that provides explicit guidance on how to proceed when patients with diabetes mellitus are in the final phase of life. 16 This guideline states that if a patient's life expectancy is only weeks to months, metformin can be discontinued, as it barely reduces glucose levels and is especially aimed at preventing long-term complications.
Reasons for continuing medications
The finding that physicians indicated that they prefer stopping medications is in contrast with the reality of patients continuing medications up until death.1–5 Only a small minority of physicians recognized some potential drivers of continuing potentially futile or harmful medications in the last phase of life. It thus remains unclear why such continuation is common practice. Possibly, continuation of PIMs is not considered or recognized as a problem in clinical practice. This lack of awareness also emerged from our interview study. 15
Limitations
Our study has some limitations. First, the response was low and therefore there is a possibility of nonresponse bias. Second, there is a chance of social desirability bias, that is, that respondents have answered questions based on their views of what is socially most acceptable. Third, the vignette may contain too little clinical information to guide the respondents in their decision-making preferences. For example, laboratory test results (such as blood glucose levels) were not available.
Conclusion
Although physicians are willing to discontinue medications, they often seem to give their patients medications for which the benefit at the end of life may be debatable. Lack of awareness could be an important reason for continuing medications in clinical practice.
Footnotes
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to acknowledge all respondents.
Author Disclosure Statement
This research study was funded by a grant from the ZonMw, the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (grant number 1151.0036). The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
