In August 2009, approximately 11,000 sexual assault kits (SAKs; “rape kits”) were found in a Detroit police department storage facility, the vast majority of which had never been tested for DNA evidence. To address this problem, a multidisciplinary action research project was formed to bring together researchers and practitioners from law enforcement, prosecution, forensic sciences, medicine/nursing, and victim advocacy to develop evidence–based response strategies. In this paper, we will draw upon qualitative interviews with Detroit stakeholders, archival records, and ethnographic observations to examine the events surrounding the discovery of the rape kits and why police personnel did not view the accumulation of so many untested SAKs as a problem. Over the course of this three–year action research project, Detroit stakeholders worked together to enact local– and state–level reforms to test these kits and to prevent this problem from happening again.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbeyAntonia, WegnerRhiana, PierceJennifer, and Jacques–TiuraAngela J.2012. “Patterns of Sexual Aggression in a Community Sample of Young Men: Risk Factors Associated with Persistence, Desistance, and Initiation Over a 1–Year Interval.” Psychology of Violence2:1–15.
BashfordMartha. March 2013. How New York City Tackled its Backlog. Webinar presented for the National Center for Victims of Crime.
4.
BraithwaiteJohn. 2013. Inequality, Crime and Public Policy (Routledge Revivals). New York: Routledge.
5.
BursikRobert J. 1988. “Social Disorganization and Theories of Crime and Delinquency: Problems and Prospects.” Criminology26:519–52.
6.
ButlerJohn M. 2010. Fundamentals of Forensic DNA Typing. Boston, MA: Academic Press/Elsevier.
7.
CampbellRebecca. 2008. “The Psychological Impact of Rape Victims’ Experiences with the Legal, Medical, and Mental Health Systems.” American Psychologist68:702–17.
8.
CampbellRebecca, Fehler–CabralGiannina, PierceSteven J., SharmaDhruv B., BybeeDeborah, ShawJessica, HorsfordSheena, and FeeneyHannah. 2015, forthcoming. The Detroit Sexual Assault Kit (SAK) Action Research Project (ARP) Final Report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
9.
CampbellRebecca, PattersonDebra, and LichtyLauren F. 2005. “The Effectiveness of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) Program: A Review of Psychological, Medical, Legal, and Community Outcomes.” Trauma, Violence, & Abuse: A Review Journal6:313–29.
10.
Department of Justice. 2013. A National Protocol for Sexual Assault Medical Forensic Examinations: Adults & Adolescents (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
11.
Dickson–SwiftVirginia, JamesErica L., and LiamputtongPranee. 2008. Undertaking sensitive research in the health and social sciences: Managing boundaries, emotions, and risks. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
DreierPeter, MollenkopfJohn, and SwanstromTodd. 2004. Place Matters: Metropolitics for the Twenty–First Century (2nd ed.). Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
13.
EisingerPeter. 2003. “Reimagining Detroit.” City & Community2:85–99.
14.
FineSidney1989. Violence in the Model City: The Cavanagh Administration, Race Relations, and the Detroit Riot of 1967. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Human Rights Watch. 2009. Testing Justice: The Rape Kit Backlog in Los Angeles City and County. New York: Author.
17.
Human Rights Watch. 2010. “I Used to Think the Law Would Protect Me”: Illinois's Failure to Test Rape Kits. New York: Author.
18.
Human Rights Watch. 2013. Capitol Offense: Police Mishandling Sexual Assault Cases in the District of Columbia. New York: Author.
19.
IAFN. 2009. Forensic Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice. Silver Spring, MD: American Nurses Association.
20.
JohansenRachel, NealZachary, and GasteyerStephen. (in press). “The View from a Broken Window: How Residents Make Sense of Neighborhood Disorder in Flint.” Urban Studies.
21.
JohnsonDonald, PetersonJoseph, SommersIra, and BaskinDeborah. 2012. “Use of Forensic Science in Investigating Crimes of Sexual Violence: Contrasting its Theoretical Potential with Empirical Realities.” Violence Against Women18:193–222.
22.
KelleyKathleen D., and CampbellRebecca. 2013. “Moving On or Dropping Out: Police Processing of Adult Sexual Assault Cases.” Women & Criminal Justice23:1–18.
23.
LedrayLinda E., BurgessAnn W., and GiardinoAngelo P. 2011. Medical Response to Adult Sexual Assault: A Resource for Clinicians and Related Professionals. St. Louis, MO: STM Learning.
24.
LiamputtongPranee. 2007. Researching the Vulnerable: A Guide to Sensitive Research Methods. London: Sage.
25.
LincolnYvonna S., and GubaEgon G. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
LisakDavid, and MillerPaul M. 2002. “Repeat Rape and Multiple Offending among Undetected Rapists.” Violence & Victims17:73–84.
27.
LonswayKimberly A., and ArchambaultJoanne. 2012. “The ‘Justice Gap’ for Sexual Assault Cases: Future Directions of Research and Reform.” Violence Against Women18:145–68.
28.
LovrichNicholas P., PrattTravis C., GaffneyMichael J., JohnsonCharles L., AsplenChristopher H., HurstLisa H. & SchellbergTimothy M. (2004). National Forensic DNA Study Report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
29.
MaddoxLucy, LeeDeborah, and BarkerChris. 2011. “Police Empathy and Victim PTSD as Potential Factors in Rape Case Attrition.” Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology26:112–17.
30.
MaierShana L. 2008. “‘I Have Heard Horrible Stories…’: Rape Victim Advocates’ Perceptions of the Revictimization of Rape Victims by the Police and Medical System.” Violence Against Women14:786–808.
31.
MaierShana L. 2012. “Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners’ Perceptions of the Revictimization of Rape Victims.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence27:287–315.
32.
MartinPatricia Y. 2005. Rape Work: Victims, Gender, and Emotions in Organization and Community Context. New York: Routledge.
33.
Michigan Domestic and Sexual Violence Prevention & Treatment Board (MDSVPTB) (2013). Report of the 400 Project. Washington, DC: Office of Violence Against Women.
34.
MilesMatthew B., HubermanA. Michael, & SaldañaJohnny. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
MonroeLaura M., KinneyLinda M., WeistMark D., DafeamekporDenise Spriggs, DantzlerJoyce, and ReynoldsMatthew W. 2005. “The Experience of Sexual Assault: Findings from a Statewide Victim Needs Assessment.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence20:767–76.
36.
National Institute of Justice (NIJ). 2010. Solicitation: Strategic Approaches to Sexual Assault Kit (SAK) Evidence: An Action Research Project (SL #000947). Washington, DC: Author.
37.
PattersonDebra. 2011a. “The Linkage between Secondary Victimization by Law Enforcement and Rape Case Outcomes.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence26:328–47.
38.
PattersonDebra. 2011b. “The Impact of Detectives’ Manner of Questioning on Rape Victims’ Disclosure.” Violence Against Women17:1349–73.
39.
PattersonDebra, and CampbellRebecca. 2012. “The Problem of Untested Sexual Assault Kits: Why Are Some Kits Never Submitted to a Crime Laboratory?”Journal of Interpersonal Violence27:2259–75.
PierceS.J., and ZhangZ.2011. Projected Numbers of Evidence Kits Expected to Reach Different Stages of Forensic Analysis: A Summary Based on Data from the 400 Project. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, Center for Statistical Training and Consulting.
42.
RossCatherine E., MirowskyJohn, and PribeshShana. 2001. “Powerlessness and the Amplification of Threat: Neighborhood Disadvantage, Disorder, and Mistrust.” American Sociological Review66:568–91.
RuschLara. 2012. “Going Regional: The Evolution of an Organizing Strategy in Detroit.” City & Community11:51–73.
45.
SampsonRobert J., and RaudenbushStephen W. 2004. “Seeing Disorder: Neighborhood Stigma and the Social Construction of ‘Broken Windows.’”Social Psychology Quarterly67:319–42.
46.
SchulzAmy J., WilliamsDavid R., IsraelBarbara A., and LempertLora Bex. 2002. “Racial and Spatial Relations as Fundamental Determinants of Health in Detroit.” Milbank Quarterly80:677–707.
47.
ShawJessica, and CampbellRebecca. 2013. “Sexual Assault Kit (SAK) Submission among Adolescent Rape Cases Treated in Forensic Nurse Examiner Programs.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence28:3400–17.
48.
SpohnCassia, and TellisKatherine. 2012. “The Criminal Justice System's Response to Sexual Violence.” Violence Against Women18:169–92.
49.
StromKevin J., and HickmanMatthew J. 2010. “Unanalyzed Evidence in Law–Enforcement Agencies: A National Examination of Forensic Processing in Police Departments.” Criminology & Public Policy9:381–404.
50.
SugrueThomas J. 2014. The Origins of the Urban Crisis: Race and Inequality in Postwar Detroit. Princeton: University Press.
51.
SwarthoutAshlyn G., SwarthoutKevin M., and WhiteJacqueline W. 2011. “What Your Data Didn't Tell You the First Time Around: Advanced Analytic Approaches to Longitudinal Analyses.” Violence Against Women17:309–21.
52.
The Weiner Report. 2002. DNA Justice: Cases Solved At Last. New York: Author.
