The authors present a method for dividing the historical development of community migration streams into an initial period and a subsequent takeoff stage with the purpose of systemically differentiating pioneer migrants from follower migrants. The analysis is organized around five basic research questions. First, can we empirically identify a juncture point in the historical development of community-based migration that marks the transition from an initial stage of low levels of migration and gradual growth into a takeoff stage in which the prevalence of migration grows at a more accelerated rate? Second, does this juncture point exist at roughly similar migration prevalence levels across communities? Third, are first-time migrants in the initial stage (pioneers) different from first-time migrants in the takeoff stage (followers)? Fourth, what is the nature of this migrant selectivity? Finally, does the nature and degree of pioneer selectivity vary across country migration streams?
Browning, H., and W. Feindt.1969. Selectivity of migrants to a metropolis in a developing country: A Mexican case study. Demography6 (4): 347-57.
2.
Bustamante, J.A., G. Jasso, J.E. Taylor, and P. Trigueros Legarreta .1998. The selectivity of international labor migration and characteristics of Mexico-to-U.S. migrants: Theoretical considerations. In Migration between Mexico and the United States, vol. 2, 699-708. Austin, TX: Mexican Ministry of Foreign Affairs and U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform .
3.
Calavita, K.1992. Inside the state: The Bracero Program, immigration, and the INS. New York: Routledge .
4.
Cerrutti, M., and D.S. Massey.2001. On the auspices of female migration between Mexico and the United States. Demography38:187-200.
5.
Davis, B., G. Stecklov, and P. Winters.2002. Domestic and international migration from rural Mexico: Disaggregating the effects of social network structure and composition. Population Studies56:291-309.
6.
Delgado-Wise, R.2004. Critical dimensions of Mexico-US migration under the aegis of neoliberalism and NAFTA. Canadian Journal of Development Studies25 (4): 591-605.
7.
del Rey, A.2007. Determinants and consequences of internal and international migration: The case of rural populations in the south of Veracruz, Mexico . Demographic Research16:287-314.
8.
Feliciano, C.2005. Educational selectivity in U.S. Immigration: How do immigrants compare to those left behind?Demography42 (1): 131-52.
9.
Fussell, E.2004. Sources of Mexico’s migration stream: Rural, urban, and border migrants to the United States. Social Forces82 (3): 937-67.
10.
Hagan, J.1998. Social networks, gender, and immigrant incorporation: Resources and constraints. American Sociological Review63:55-67.
11.
Hatton, T., and J. Williamson.2004. International migration in the long run: Positive selection, negative selection and policy. Working Paper no. 2038, Institute for Economic Research, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
12.
Hirabayashi, L.R.1993. Cultural capital: Mountain Zapotec migrant associations in Mexico City. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
13.
Janssen, E., and R. Zenteno.2005. Determinantes económicos y sociodemográficos de la migración interna en México. Un análisis por sexo . In Cambio demográfico y social en el México del siglo XX: Una perspectiva de historias de vida, edited by M. Coubes, E. Zavala de Cosío , and R. Zenteno, 161-89. Tijuana , Mexico: El Colegio de la Frontera Norte.
14.
Jasso, G., D. Massey, M. Rosenzweig, and J. Smith.2000. The New Immigrant Survey Pilot (NIS-P): Overview and new findings about U.S. legal immigrants at admission. Demography37 (1): 127-38.
15.
Jokisch, B., and J. Pribilsky.2002. The panic to leave: Economic crisis and the new emigration from Ecuador. International Migration40 (4): 74-101.
16.
Jones, R.C.1995. Ambivalent journey: U.S. migration and economic mobility in North-Central Mexico. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
17.
Jones, R.1998. Remittances and inequality: A question of migration stage and geographic scale. Economic Geography74 (1): 8-25.
18.
Lindstrom, D.P.1996. Economic opportunity in Mexico and return migration from the United States. Demography33 (3): 357-74.
19.
Lindstrom, D.P., and J. F. Martínez López.2008. Cambios en la dinámica de migración de los trabajadores guatemaltecos. In Entre la costa sur guatemalteca y Estados Unidos de América . Guatemala City: Centro de Estudios Urbanos y Regionales (CEUR), Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala .
20.
Lowell, B.L.1987. Scandinavian exodus: Demography and social development of 19th-century rural communities. Boulder, CO: Westview.
21.
Massey, D.S.1986. The social organization of Mexican migration to the United States. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science487:102-13.
22.
Massey, D.S.1987. Understanding Mexican migration to the United States . American Journal of Sociology92:1372-1403.
23.
Massey, D.S.1990. Social structure, household strategies, and the cumulative causation of migration. Population Index56:3-26.
24.
Massey, D.S.1999. Why does immigration occur? A theoretical synthesis . In The handbook of international migration: The American experience , ed. C. Hirschman, P. Kasinitz, and J. DeWind, 34-52. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
25.
Massey, D., R. Alarcón, J. Durand, and H. González .1987. Return to Aztlan. The social process of international migration from western Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
Massey, D.S., J. Arango, G. Hugo, A. Kouaouci, A. Pellegrino, and J.E. Taylor.1993. Theories of international migration: A review and appraisal. Population and Development Review19:431-66.
27.
Massey, D.S., J. Durand, and N.J. Malone.2002. Beyond smoke and mirrors: Mexican immigration in an era of economic integration. New York : Russell Sage Foundation.
28.
Massey, D.S., and K. Espinosa.1997. What’s driving Mexico-U.S. migration? A theoretical, empirical, and policy analysis. American Journal of Sociology102 (4): 939-99.
29.
Massey, D.S., M.J. Fischer, and C. Capoferro.2006. Gender and migration in Latin America: A comparative analysis. International Migration44:1-29.
30.
Massey, D.S., L. Goldring, and J. Durand.1994. Continuities in transnational migration: An analysis of nineteen Mexican communities. American Journal of Sociology99 (6): 1492-533.
31.
Massey, D.S., and E. Parrado.1998. International migration and business formation in Mexico. Social Science Quarterly79 (1): 1-19.
32.
Massey, D.S., and M. Sana.2003. Patterns of U.S. migration from Mexico, the Caribbean, and Central America. Migraciones Internacionales2 (2): 5-39.
33.
Massey, D.S., and R. Zenteno.1999. The dynamics of mass migration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences96 (8): 5328-35.
34.
Mines, R., and D. Massey.1985. Patterns of migration to the United States from two Mexican communities. Latin American Research Review20:104-23.
35.
Oliveira, O. de.1998. Familia y Relaciones de Génaro en Transformación . Mexico City: The Population Council .
36.
Oliver, R.S.2007. In the twelve years of NAFTA, the treaty gave to me . . . what, exactly? An assessment of economic, social, and political developments in Mexico since 1994 and their impact on Mexican immigration into the United States. Harvard Latino Law Review10:53-133.
37.
Parrado, E., and M. Cerrutti.2003. Labor migration between developing countries: The case of Paraguay and Argentina. International Migration Review37 (1): 101-32.
38.
Peña, J., B. Salvatierra, G. Martínez, and R. Zúñiga .2000. Determinantes socioeconómicos de la migración laboral: El caso de los indígenas mames de la Sierra Madre de Chiapas, México. Papeles de Población23:153-79.
39.
Pessar, P.R.1999. The role of gender, households, and social networks in the migration process: A review and appraisal. In The handbook of international migration: The American experience, ed. C. Hirschman, P. Kasinitz , and J. DeWind, 53-70. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
40.
Petersen, W.1961. Population. New York, NY: Macmillan.
41.
Piore, M.J.1979. Birds of passage: Migrant labor and industrial societies . New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Popkin, E.1999. Guatemalan Mayan migration to Los Angeles: Constructing transnational linkages in the context of the settlement process. Ethnic and Racial Studies22 (2): 267-89.
43.
Portes, A., and R.L. Bach.1985. Latin journey: Cuban and Mexican immigrants in the United States. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
44.
Reichert, J., and D. Massey.1979. Patterns of U.S. migration from a Mexican sending community: A comparison of legal and illegal migrants. International Migration Review13 (4): 599-623.
45.
Stark, O., and D. Bloom.1985. The new economics of labor migration . American Economic Review75:173-78.
46.
Stark, O., J.E. Taylor, and S. Yitzhaki.1986. Remittances and inequality. Economic Journal96:722-40.
47.
Stromquist, N.P.1998. Familia en Surgimiento y Democratización de las Relaciones de Génaro. In Familias y Relaciones de Génaro en Transformación, ed. B. Schmukler , 127-51. Mexico City: The Population Council.
48.
Taylor, J. Edward.1986. Differential migration, networks, information, and risk . In Migration theory, human capital and development , ed. O. Stark, 147-71. Greenwich, CT : Greenwood.
49.
Taylor, J.E.1987. Undocumented Mexico-U.S. migration and the returns to households in rural Mexico. American Journal of Agricultural Economics69:626-38.
50.
White, M.J., and D.P. Lindstrom.2005. Internal migration. In Handbook of population, ed. D. L. Poston and M. Micklin, 311-46. New York: Kluwer Academic.
