The theory of the cumulative causation of migration posits that as migratory experience grows within a sending community, the likelihood that other community members will initiate a migratory trip increases. This diffusion is expected to vary across time and place according to differences in the mechanisms guiding this behavior. The author compares the effect of the prevalence of migratory experience on the likelihood that adult men would take a first U.S. trip between 1965 and 2001 from the Dominican Republic, Costa Rica, Mexico, Nicaragua, and Puerto Rico. Both the consistencies and inconsistencies among countries suggest that the cumulative causation of migration is an important dynamic in perpetuating migration, although it does not contribute equally to all migration streams. In all countries except Nicaragua, as more members of a community gain U.S. migration experience, other nonmigrant community members are increasingly likely to take a first U.S. trip. In Nicaragua, U.S. migration was mainly driven by the Contra War and U.S. political asylum extended during that time.
Boyd, Monica.1989. Family and personal networks in international migration-Recent developments and new agendas. International Migration Review23:638-70.
2.
Curran, Sara R., Filiz Garip, Chang Y. Chung, and Kanchana Tangchonlatip .2005. Gendered migrant social capital: Evidence from Thailand. Social Forces84 (1): 225-55.
3.
Duany, Jorge.2002. Mobile livelihoods: The socio-cultural practices of circular migrants between Puerto Rico and the United States. International Migration Review36 (2): 355-88.
4.
Fussell, Elizabeth.2004. Sources of Mexico’s migration stream: Rural, urban and border migrants. Social Forces82 (3): 937-67.
5.
Fussell, Elizabeth, and Douglas S. Massey .2004. The limits to cumulative causation: International migration from Mexican urban areas. Demography41 (1): 151-71.
6.
Granovetter, Mark S.1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78 (6): 1360-80.
7.
Granovetter, Mark S.1983. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited . Sociological Theory1:201-33.
8.
Hatton, Timothy J., and Jeffrey G. Williamson .1994. International migration 1850-1939: An economic survey. In Migration and the international labor market: 1950-1939, ed. Timothy J. Hatton and Jeffrey G. Williamson, 3-32. London: Routledge.
9.
Korinek, Kim, Barbara Entwistle, and Aree Jampaklay.2005. Through thick and thin: Layers of social ties and urban settlement among Thai migrants. American Sociological Review70 (5): 779-800.
10.
Lindstrom, David P., and Nathanael Lauster .2001. Local economic opportunity and the competing risks of internal and U.S. migration in Zacatecas, Mexico . International Migration Review35 (4): 1232-56.
11.
Lundquist, Jennifer Hickes, and Douglas S. Massey .2005. Politics or economics? International migration to the U.S. during the Nicaraguan Contra War. Journal of Latin American Studies37:29-53.
12.
Martin, Philip L., and J. Edward Taylor .1996. The anatomy of a migration hump. In Development strategy, employment, and migration: Insights from models, ed. J. Edward Taylor, 43-62. Paris : Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Development Center.
13.
Massey, Douglas S.1990. Social structure, household strategies, and the cumulative causation of migration. Population Index56:3-26.
14.
Massey, Douglas S.1999. Why does immigration occur? A theoretical synthesis. In The handbook of international migration: The American experience , ed. Charles Hirschman, Philip Kasinitz, and Josh DeWind, 34-52. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
15.
Massey, Douglas S., Joaquin Arango, Graeme Hugo, Ali Kouaouci, Adela Pellegrino, and J. Edward Taylor .1994. An evaluation of international migration theory: The North American case. Population and Development Review19 (3): 699-751.
16.
Massey, Douglas S., and Kristin Espinosa .1997. What’s driving Mexico-U.S. migration? A theoretical, empirical and policy analysis. American Journal of Sociology102:939-99.
17.
Massey, Douglas S., and Felipe García España.1987. The social process of international migration. Science237:733-38.
18.
Massey, Douglas S., Luin Goldring, and Jorge Durand.1994. Continuities in transnational migration: An analysis of nineteen Mexican communities. American Journal of Sociology99:1492-1533.
19.
Massey, Douglas S., and Mariano Sana.2003. Patterns of U.S. migration from Mexico, the Caribbean, and Central America. Migraciones Internacionales2 (2): 5-39.
20.
Massey, Douglas S., and René M. Zenteno.1999. The dynamics of mass migration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences96 (8): 5328-35.
21.
Ortiz, Vilma.1986. Changes in the characteristics of Puerto Rican migrants from 1955 to 1980. International Migration Review20 (3): 612-28.
22.
Palloni, Alberto, Douglas S. Massey, Miguel Ceballos, Kristin Espinosa, and Michael Spittel .2001. Social capital and international migration: A test using information on family networks. American Journal of Sociology106 (5): 1262-98.
23.
Phillips, Julie A., and Douglas S. Massey .2000. Engines of immigration: Stocks of human and social capital in Mexico. Social Science Quarterly81 (1): 33-48.
24.
Portes, Alejandro, and Julia Sensenbrenner .1993. Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. American Journal of Sociology98 (6): 1320-50.
25.
Portes, Alejandro, and John Walton.1981. Labor, class, and the international system. New York: Academic Press .
26.
Sana, Mariano, and Douglas S. Massey .2005. Household composition, family migration, and community context: Migrant remittances in four countries. Social Science Quarterly86:509-28.
27.
Sassen, Saskia.1988. The mobility of labor and capital: A study in international investment and labor flow. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Stark, Oded, and J. Edward Taylor .1989. Relative deprivation and international migration. Demography26:1-14.
29.
Stecklov, Guy, Paul Winters, Marco Stampini, and Benjamin Davis.2005. Do conditional cash transfers influence migration? A study using experimental data from the Mexican PROGRESA Program . Demography42 (4): 769-90.
30.
Taylor, J. Edward.1986. Differential migration, networks, information and risk . In Research in human capital and development, vol. 4, Migration, human capital, and development, ed. Oded Stark , 147-71. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Wilson, Tamar Diana.1998. Weak ties, strong ties: Network principles in Mexican migration. Human Organization57 (4): 394-403.
33.
Winters, Paul, Alain de Janvry, and Elisabeth Sadoulet .2001. Family and community networks in MexicoU.S. migration. Journal of Human Resources36 (1): 159-84.
