Few studies have addressed the effects of teacher education generally, no less the specific program elements necessary to prepare competent and caring teachers. As a result, to address teacher shortages in science, mathematics, and special education, alternatives to traditional preparation have been proposed, and their development has proceeded apace. In the absence of guidance from research, alternative program designs have dramatically varied, even on such fundamental considerations as program length and the amount of preparation trainees require before becoming teachers of record. However, research on teacher education is only one potential source of guidance for program design. In this article, the authors use economic research and theory to identify principles of effective design. Considerations include program location, candidate selection, program cost, financial support, program requirements, practice teaching, and mentorship. They use these principles to compare and contrast fast-track programs and programs for midcareer changers.
Akerlof, G. (1970). Market for lemons. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488-500.
2.
Andrew, M., & Schwab, R. (1995). Has reform in teacher education influenced teacher performance? An outside assessment of graduates of an eleven-university consortium . Action in Teacher Education, 17(3), 43-53.
3.
Becker, G. (1962). Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis . Journal of Political Economy, 70, 9-49.
4.
Becker, G. (1975). Human capital (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press .
5.
Benson, M. (1998, January 28). Teacher program strains to lure new recruits. Wall Street Journal, p. CA1.
6.
Betts, J.R., Rueben, K.S., & Danenberg, A. (2000). Equal resources, equal outcomes? The distribution of school resources and student achievement in California. Retrieved June 30, 2005, from http://www.ppic.org/main/publication.asp?i=64
7.
Boyd, D., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2003a). Analyzing the determinant of the matching of public teachers to jobs: Estimating the compensating differentials in imperfect labor markets (Working Paper 9878)Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
8.
Boyd, D., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2003b). The draw of home: How teachers' preferences for proximity disadvantage urban schools (Working Paper 9953)Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research .
9.
Burdett, K. (1978). Theory of employee search: Quit rates. American Economic Review, 68, 212-220.
10.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000a). Solving the dilemmas of teacher supply, demand, and standards: How we can ensure a competent, caring, and qualified teacher for every child. New York: National Commission on Teaching & America's Future.
11.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000b). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives , 8(1). Retrieved June 30, 2005, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1
12.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2002). Research and rhetoric on teacher certification: A response to “Teacher certification reconsidered.”Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(36). Retrieved June 5, 2003, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n36.html
13.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Sclan, E.M. (1996). Who teaches and why: Dilemmas of building a profession for 21st century schools. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 67-93). New York: Macmillan.
14.
Feistritzer, C.E., Haar, C.K., Hobar, J.H., & Scullion, A.B. (2005). Alternative teacher certification: A state-by-state analysis 2005. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Information.
15.
Fetler, M. (1999). High school staff characteristics and mathematics test results. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7(9). Retrieved June 30, 2005, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v7n9.html
16.
Flyer, F., & Rosen, S. (1997). The new economics of teachers and education. Journal of Labor Economics, 15(1, Pt. 2), S104-S139.
17.
Fowler, R.C. (2003, April 22). The Massachusetts signing bonus program for new teachers: A model of teacher preparation worth copying? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(13). Retrieved September 10, 2003, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n13/
18.
Fuller, E. (1998). Do properly certified teachers matter? A Comparison of elementary school performance on the TAAS in 1997 between schools with high and low percentages of properly certified regular education teachers . Austin: University of Texas, Charles A. Dana Center.
19.
Fuller, E. (2000, April). Do properly certified teachers matter? Properly certified algebra teachers and algebra I achievement in Texas. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AmericanEducational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
20.
Goe, L. ( 2002). Legislating equity: The distribution of emergency permit teachers in California. Educational Policy Analysis Archives , 10(42). Retrieved November 8, 2002, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n42
21.
Goldhaber, D., & Brewer, D. (2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22, 129-145.
22.
Hanushek, E.A., Kain, J.F., & Rivkin, S.G. (1998). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement (Working Paper 6691). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
23.
Hanushek, E.A., Kain, J.F., & Rivkin, S.G. (2004). The revolving door: Factors affecting teacher turnover. In W. J. Fowler, Jr. (Ed.), Developments in school finance: 2003 (pp. 5-15). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center on Educational Statistics.
24.
Hawk, P., Coble, C.R., & Swanson, M. (1985). Certification: Does it matter?Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 13-15.
25.
Henke, R.R., Chen, X., Geis, S., & Knepper, P. (2000). Progress through the teacher pipeline: 1992-93 college graduates and elementary/secondary school teaching as of 1997 (NCES 2000-152). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
26.
Hess, F.M. (2001). Tear down the wall: The case for a radical overhaul of teacher certification. Retrieved June 24, 2005, from http://www.ppionline.org/ppi_sub.cfm?knlgAreaID=110&subsecID=135
27.
Hollis, E.R., & Guzman, M.T. (2005). Research on preparing teachers for diverse populations . In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 477-548). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association .
28.
Ingersoll, R. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 499-534.
29.
Ingersoll, R.M. (2003). Is there really a teacher shortage? (R-03-04) . Seattle: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
30.
Johnson, S.M. (2004). Finders and keepers: Helping new teachers survive and thrive in our schools. San Francisco: John Wiley.
31.
Johnson, W. (1978). A theory of job shopping. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 92, 261-267.
32.
Jovanovic, B. (1979). Firm-specific capital and turnover. Journal of Political Economy, 87, 1246-1260.
33.
Kain, J., & Singleton, K. (1996, May/June). Equality of educational opportunity revisited. New England Economic Review, pp. 87-111.
34.
Kane, T.J., & Rouse, C.E. (1999). Labor-market returns to two- and four-year college . American Economic Review, 85, 600-614.
35.
Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools . Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 37-62.
36.
Lauritzen, P., & Friedman, S.J. (1993). Meeting the supply/demand requirements of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Teacher Education and Special Education, 16, 221-229.
37.
Leland, H. (1979). Quacks, lemons, and licensing: A theory of minimum quality standards. Journal of Political Economy, 87, 1328-1346.
38.
Monk, D. (1994). Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 12(2), 125-142.
39.
Mortensen, D. (1978). Specific capital and labor turnover. Bell Journal of Economics, 9, 572-586.
40.
National Commission on Teaching & America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future . New York: Author.
41.
National Commission on Teaching & America's Future. (2003). No dream denied: A pledge to America's children . New York: Author.
42.
National Teacher Recruitment Clearinghouse. (n.d.). Teacher shortage areas. Retrieved April 25, 2005, from http://www.recruitingteachers.org/channels/clearinghouse/becometeacher/121_teachershort.htm
43.
Reback, R. (2004). The impact of college course offering on the supply of academically talented public school teachers. Journal ofEconometrics, 121, 377-404.
44.
Rosenberg, M.S., Boyer, K.L., Sindelar, P.T., & Misra, S. (2007). Alternative route programs to certification in special education: What we know about program design, instructional delivery, and participant characteristics. Exceptional Children, 73, 224-241.
45.
Sanders, W.L., & Horn, S. (1998). Research findings from the Tennessee Value-added Assessment System (TVAAS) data-base: Implications for educational evaluation and research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education , 12, 247-256.
46.
Sanders, W.L., & Rivers, J.C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future academic achievement. Knoxville: University of Tennessee, Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
47.
Singer, J.D. (1993). Once is not enough: Former special educators who return to teaching. Exceptional Children, 60, 58-72.
48.
Smith, T.M., & Ingersoll, R.M. (2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover?American Educational Research Journal, 41, 681-714.
49.
Strauss, R.P., & Sawyer, E.A. (1986). Some new evidence on teacher and student competencies . Economics of Education Review, 5, 41-48.
50.
Study of Personnel Needs in Special Education. (n.d.-a). Table 3.11. Percent of special education teachers with various types of teacher certification, by district poverty. Retrieved June 30, 2005 , from http://ferdig.coe.ufl.edu/spense/scripts/tables/htdocs/Table3_11.htm
51.
Study of Personnel Needs in Special Education. (n.d.-b). Table 3.17. Percent of special education teachers who had various types of certification when they started teaching, by district poverty. Retrieved June 30, 2005, from http://ferdig.coe.ufl.edu/spense/scripts/tables/htdocs/Table3_17.htm
52.
U.S. Census Bureau (n.d.). Table 11. Educational attainment of people 18 years and over, by metropolitan and nonmetropolitan residence, age, sex, race and Hispanic origin: March 2002. Retrieved November 1, 2004, from http://www.census.gov/population/www./socdemo/education/ppl-169.html
53.
U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.-a). Table AC1. Number of special education teachers serving children ages 3-5, by state . Retrieved September 3, 2004, from http://www.IDEAdata.org/arc_toc5.asp#partbPEN/
54.
U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.-b). Table AC2. Number of special education teachers serving students ages 6-21, by state . Retrieved September 3, 2004, from http://www.IDEAdata.org/arc_toc4.asp#partbPEN/
55.
Wallace, T. (2003). Paraprofessionals (IB-3). Retrieved September 7, 2006, from http://www.copsse.org/
56.
Walsh, K. (2001). Teacher certification reconsidered: Stumbling for quality. Retrieved June 24, 2005, from http://www.abell.org/publications/detail.asp?ID=59
57.
Zeichner, K.M., & Conklin, H.G. (2005). Teacher education programs. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 645-735). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association .
