Guided by an integration of existing theories on advice and persuasion, the current study presented and assessed the influence of multiple message and source factors on responses to advice in supportive interactions. A total of 262 participants completed survey instruments designed to assess message and source factors and advice outcomes with regard to a recent instance of having received advice for a personal difficulty. Results showed that the sets of source factors (expertise, liking, trust, and similarity) and message factors (politeness, response efficacy, feasibility, absence of limitations, and confirmation) each had independent influences on advice outcomes (evaluation of advice quality, facilitation of coping, and intention to implement the advice), but the effect of source factors was partially mediated by message factors. In addition, the message factors had a stronger impact on advice outcomes as problem seriousness increased. The results also showed a different pattern of prediction for implementation intention than for the other advice outcomes.
Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. ( 1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Anderson, R.B., & McMillion, P.Y. (1995). Effects of similar and diversified modeling on African American women’s efficacy expectations and intentions to perform breast self-examination. Health Communication, 7, 327-343.
3.
Arora, N.K., Rutten, L.J.F., Gustafson, D.H., Moser, R., & Hawkins, R.P. ( 2007). Perceived helpfulness and impact of social support provided by family, friends, and health care providers to women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 474-486.
4.
Bodie, G.D., & Burleson, B.R. (2008). Explaining variations in the effects of supportive messages: A dual-process framework. In C. Beck (Ed.), Communication yearbook, 32 (pp. 354-398). New York: Routledge .
5.
Bonaccio, S., & Dalal, R.S. ( 2006). Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative review of the literature. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101, 127-151.
6.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S.C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Burleson, B.R., & MacGeorge, E.L. (2002). Supportive communication . In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 374-424). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cohen, P., Brook, J.S., Cohen, J., Velez, C.N., & Garcia, M. ( 1990). Common and uncommon pathways to adolescent psychopathology and problem behavior. In L. Robins & M. Rutter (Eds.), Straight and devious pathways from childhood to adulthood (pp. 242-258). London: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Dakof, G.A., & Taylor, S.E. ( 1990). Victims’ perceptions of social support: What is helpful from whom? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 58, 80-89.
11.
DeBono, K.G., & Harnish, R.J. ( 1988). Source expertise, source attractiveness, and the processing of persuasive information: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 541-546.
12.
Feng, B. ( 2006). Features and effects of advice in supportive interactions in two cultures. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University.
13.
Feng, B., & Burleson, B.R. (2008). The effects of argument explicitness on responses to advice in supportive interactions. Communication Research, 35, 849-874.
14.
Feng, B., & MacGeorge, E.L. (2006). Predicting receptiveness to advice: Characteristics of the problem, the advice-giver, and the recipient . Southern Communication Journal, 71, 67-85.
15.
Goldsmith, D.J. ( 1994). The role of facework in supportive communication. In B. R. Burleson, T. L. Albrecht, & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community (pp. 29-49). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Goldsmith, D.J. ( 2000). Soliciting advice: The role of sequential placement in mitigating face threat. Communication Monographs, 67(1), 1-19.
17.
Goldsmith, D.J., & MacGeorge, E.L. (2000). The impact of politeness and relationship on perceived quality of advice about a problem. Human Communication Research, 26, 234-263.
18.
Hass, R.G. ( 1981). Effects of source characteristics on cognitive responses and persuasion. In R. E. Petty, T. Ostrom, & T. Brock (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion (pp. 141-172). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19.
Hung, H.Y., & Feeley, T.H. ( 2005). Evaluating advice in supportive social interaction: A replication of MacGeorge, Feng, Butler, and Budarz (2004). Paper presented at the International Communication Association , New York.
20.
Johnson, B.T., & Eagly, A.H. ( 1989). The effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis . Psychological Bulletin, 106, 290-314.
21.
Jungermann, H., & Fischer, K. ( 2005). Using expertise and experience for giving and taking advice. In T. Betsch & S. Haberstroh (Eds.), The routines of decision making (pp. 157-173). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
MacGeorge, E.L., Feng, B., Butler, G.L., & Budarz, S.K. ( 2004). Understanding advice in supportive Interactions: Beyond the facework and message evaluation paradigm. Human Communication Research, 30, 42-70.
23.
MacGeorge, E.L., Feng, B., & Thompson, E.R. (2008). "Good" and "bad" advice: How to advise more effectively. In M. Motley (Ed.), Applied interpersonal communication: Behaviors that affect outcomes (pp. 145-164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
MacGeorge, E.L., Graves, A.R., Feng, B., Gillihan, S.J., & Burleson, B.R. (2004). The myth of gender cultures: Similarities outweigh differences in men’s and women’s provision of and responses to supportive communication. Sex Roles, 50, 143-175.
25.
MacGeorge, E.L., Lichtman, R.M., & Pressey, L.C. ( 2002). The evaluation of advice in supportive interactions: Facework and contextual factors. Human Communication Research , 28, 451-463.
MacKinnon, D.P., Lockwood, C.M., & Williams, J. ( 2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99-128.
28.
Maynard, D.W. ( 1989). Perspective-display sequences in conversation. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53, 91-113.
29.
McCroskey, J.C., Richmond, V.P., & Daly, J.A. ( 1975). The development of a measure of perceived homophily in interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research , 1, 323-333.
30.
O’Keefe, D. ( 1990). Persuasion: Theory and research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31.
Perloff, R.M. ( 2008). The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the 21st century. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32.
Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T., & Goldman, R. ( 1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847-855.
33.
Petty, R.E., Rucker, D.D., Bizer, G.Y., & Cacioppo, J.T. (2004). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In J. S. Seiter & R. H. Gass (Eds.), Perspectives on persuasion, social influence, and compliance gaining (pp. 65-89). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
34.
Preacher, K.J., & Hayes, A.F. ( 2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731.
Rubin, Z. ( 1970). Measurement of romantic love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 265-273.
37.
Servaty-Seib, H.L., & Burleson, B.R. (2007). Bereaved adolescents’ evaluations of the helpfulness of support-intended statements: Associations with person centeredness and demographic, personality, and contextual factors . Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 207-223.
38.
Sherif, M., & Hovland, C.I. ( 1961). Social judgment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
39.
Shrout, P.E., & Bolger, N. ( 2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods , 7, 422-445.
40.
Silvia, P.J. ( 2005). Deflecting reactance: The role of similarity in increasing compliance and reducing resistance. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 277-284.
41.
Sniezek, J.A., & Van Swol, L.M. (2001). Trust, confidence, and expertise in a judge-advisor system. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84, 288-307.
42.
Thom, D.H., Kravitz, R.L., Bell, R.A., Krupat, E., & Azarid, R. ( 2002). Patient trust in the physician: Relationship to patient request. Family Practice, 19, 476-483.
43.
Todorov, A., Chaiken, S., & Henderson, M.D. (2002). The heuristic-systematic model of social information processing. In J. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 195-211). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
Wheeless, L.R., & Grotz, J. ( 1977). The measurement of trust and its relationship to self-disclosure . Human Communication Research, 3, 250-257.
45.
White, T.B. ( 2005). Consumer trust and advice acceptance: The moderating roles of benevolence, expertise, and negative emotions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15, 141-148.
46.
Yaniv, I. ( 2004). Receiving other people’s advice: Influence and benefit. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 93, 1-13.
47.
Yaniv, I., & Kleinberger, E. (2000). Advice taking in decision making: Egocentric discounting and reputation formation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84, 260-281.
