The assigning of different weights to risk factors in actuarial formulas for the assessment of violence risk in criminal offenders has been debated. The authors explore the predictive validity of an index with 10 well-established risk factors for criminal recidivism with respect to violent reconvictions among 404 former forensic psychiatric examinees in Sweden. Four different weighting conditions are tested experimentally, including Nuffield’s method, bivariate and multivariate logistic regression, and an artificial neural network procedure. Simpler weighting techniques do not improve predictive accuracy over that of a nonweighted reference, and the more complex procedures yield a statistical shrinkage effect. The authors hypothesize that the general lack of causal risk factors in prediction models may contribute to the observed low utility of weighting techniques.
American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
Belfrage, H., Fransson, G., & Strand, S. (2000). Prediction of violence using the HCR-20 risk. A prospective study in two maximum security correctional institutions. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 11, 167-175.
3.
Bleeker, S. E., Moll, H. A., Steyerberg, E. W., Donders, A. R. T., Derksen-Lubsen, G., Grobbee, D. R., et al. (2003). External validation is necessary in prediction research: A clinical example. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56, 826-832.
4.
Brodzinski, J. D., Crable, E. A., & Scherer, R. F. (1994). Using artificial intelligence to model juvenile recidivism patterns. Computers in Human Services, 10, 1-18.
5.
Caulkins, J., Cohen, J., Gorr, W., & Wei, J. (1996). Predicting criminal recidivism: A comparison of neural network models with statistical methods. Journal of Criminal Justice, 24, 227-240.
6.
Cicchetti, D. V. (1992). Neural network and diagnosis in the clinical laboratory: State of the art. Clinical Chemistry, 38, 9-10.
7.
Cohen, J. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45, 1304-1312.
8.
Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.
9.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Dawes, R. M. (1979). The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision models. American Psychologist, 34, 571-582.
11.
Dernevik, M., Johansson, S., & Grann, M. (2002). Violent behaviour in forensic psychiatric patients: Risk assessment and different risk-management levels using the HCR-20. Psychology, Crime & Law, 8, 93-112.
12.
Douglas, K. S. (2004). HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme: Overview and annotated bibliography. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Simon Fraser University, Department of Psychology.
13.
Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Dempster, R. J., & Lyon, D. J. (1999, July). The Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG): Attempt at validation in a maximum security forensic psychiatric sample. Poster session presented at the joint meeting of European Association of Psychology & Law/American Psychology-Law Society, Dublin, Ireland.
14.
Douglas, K. S., Ogloff, J. R. P., Nicholls, T. L., & Grant, I. (1999). Assessing risk for violence among psychiatric patients: The HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme and the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 917-930.
15.
Douglas, K. S., & Webster, C. D. (1999). The HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme: Concurrent validity in a sample of incarcerated offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 3-19.
16.
Ennis, B. J., & Litwack, T. R. (1974). Psychiatry and the presumption of expertise: Flipping coins in the courtroom. California Law Review, 62, 693-752.
17.
Fletcher, J. M., Rice, W. J., & Ray, R. M. (1978). Linear discriminant function analysis in neuropsychological research: Some uses and abuses. Cortex, 14, 564-577.
18.
Grann, M. (1998). Personality disorder and violent criminality: A follow-up study with special reference to psychopathy and risk assessment (doctoral dissertation). Stockholm, Sweden: Karolinska Institutet.
19.
Grann, M., Belfrage, H., & Tengström, A. (2000). Actuarial risk assessment in Sweden: Predictive validity of the VRAG and the historical part of the HCR-20. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 97-114.
20.
Grann, M., Långström, N., Tengström, A., & Stålenheim, E. G. (1998). The reliability of file-based retrospective ratings of psychopathy with the PCL-R. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 416-426.
21.
Grann, M., Sturidsson, K., Haggård-Grann, U., Hiscoke, U. L., Alm, P.-O., Dernevik, M., et al. (in press). Methodological development: Structured Outcome Assessment and Community Risk Monitoring (SORM). International Journal of Forensic Psychiatry.
22.
Guerriere, M. R. J., & Detsky, A. S. (1991). Neural networks: What are they? Annals of Internal Medicine, 115, 906-907.
23.
Gunn, J. (1996). Let’s get serious about dangerousness. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 6, 51-64.
24.
Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143, 29-36.
25.
Hanson, R. K. (1997). The development of a brief actuarial scale for sexual offense recidivism (User Report No. 1997-04). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
26.
Hare, R. D. (1991). The Hare PCL-R: Rating booklet. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
27.
Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (2002). Prospective replication of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide in predicting violent recidivism among forensic patients. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 377-394.
28.
Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders. The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 315-335.
29.
Hart, S. D. (1998). The role of psychopathy in assessing risk for violence: Conceptual and methodological issues. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 123-140.
30.
Hart, S. D. (2002, September). Communicating about violence risk. Workshop at the Safer Society Conference, Glasgow, Scotland.
31.
Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Menzies, R. J. (1993). A note on portraying the accuracy of violence predictions. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 695-700.
32.
Heilbrun, K. (1997). Prediction versus management models relevant to risk assessment: The importance of legal decision-making context. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 347-360.
33.
Henderson, A. R. (1993). Assessing test accuracy and its clinical consequences: A primer for receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry, 30, 521-539.
34.
Kartalopoulos, S. V. (1995). Understanding neural networks and fuzzy logics. Basic concepts and applications. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Press.
35.
Kleinbaum, D. G. (1994). Logistic regression: A self-learning text. New York: Springer.
36.
Kleinbaum, D. G., Kupper, L. L., Muller, K. E., & Nizam, A. (1998). Applied regression analysis and other multivariate methods. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.
37.
Kraemer, H. C., Kazdin, A. E., Offord, D. R., Kessler, R. C., Jensen, P. S., & Kupfer, D. J. (1997). Coming to term with the terms of risk. Archives of General Psychiatry, 54, 337-343.
38.
Långström, N., Grann, M., Tengström, A., Lindholm, N., Woodhouse, A., & Kullgren, G. (1999). Data extraction for file-based forensic psychiatric research: Some methodological considerations. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 53, 61-67.
39.
Lawrence, J. (1993). Introduction to neural networks. Nevada City, CA: California Scientific Software.
40.
Litwack, T. R. (2001). Actuarial versus clinical assessments of dangerousness. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 409-443.
41.
Loeber, R., & Farrington, D. P. (Eds.). (1998). Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful intervention. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
Monahan, J. (1984). The prediction of violent behavior: Toward a second generation of theory and policy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 10-15.
43.
Mossman, D. (1994). Assessing predictions of violence: Being accurate about accuracy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 783-792.
44.
Mulsant, B. H. (1990). A neural network approach to clinical diagnosis. M.D. Computing, 7, 25-36.
45.
Palocsay, S. W., Wang, P., & Brookshire, R. G. (2000). Predicting criminal recidivism using neural networks. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 34, 271-284.
46.
Quinsey, V. L., Rice, M. E., Harris, G. T., & Cormier, C. A. (1998). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
47.
Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1995). Violent recidivism: Assessing predictive validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 737-748.
48.
Ripley, B. D. (1996). Pattern recognition and neural networks. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
49.
Rogers, R. (2000). The uncritical acceptance of risk assessment in forensic practice. Law and Human Behavior, 5, 595-605.
50.
Schoonjans, F. (1998). MedCalc. Statistics for biomedical research (Version 5) [Computer software]. Mariakerke, Belgium: MedCalc Software.
51.
Silver, E. (2000). Race, neighborhood disadvantage, and violence among persons with mental disorder: The importance of contextual measurement. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 449-456.
52.
Sjöstedt, G., & Grann, M. (2002). Risk assessment: What is being predicted by actuarial “prediction instruments”? International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 1, 179-183.
53.
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. (1998). Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (Version 8.5) [Computer software]. Chicago: Author.
54.
Strand, S., Belfrage, H., Fransson, G., & Levander, S. (1999). Clinical and risk management factors in risk prediction of mentally disordered offenders: More important that actuarial data? Legal and Criminological Psychology, 4, 67-76.
55.
Sturidsson, K., Haggård-Grann, U., Lotterberg, M., Dernevik, M., & Grann, M. (2004). Clinicians’ perceptions of which factors increase or decrease risk of violence among forensic outpatients. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 3, 23-36.
56.
Susser, M., & Susser, E. (1996). Choosing a future epidemiology: II. From black box to Chinese boxes and eco-epidemiology. American Journal of Public Health, 86, 674-677.
57.
Tam, K. Y., & Kiang, M. Y. (1992). Managerial applications of neural networks: The case of bank failure predictions. Management Science, 20, 879-888.
58.
Tengström, A. (2001). Long-term predictive validity of historical factors in two risk assessment instruments in a group of violent offenders with schizophrenia. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 55, 243-249.
Webster, C., Douglas, K., Eaves, D., & Hart, S. (1997). HCR-20. Assessing risk for violence (Version 2). Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Simon Fraser University and Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission of British Columbia.
61.
Webster, C. D., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Cormier, C., & Quinsey, V. L. (1994). The violence prediction scheme. Assessing dangerousness in high risk men. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto, Center of Criminology.
62.
Whittemore, K. E. (1999). Releasing the mentally disordered offender: Disposition decisions for individuals found unfit to stand trial and not criminally responsible. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada.
63.
World Health Organization. (1976). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (9th rev.). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
