A prison inmate's risk of recidivism is central to decisions about whether to release her to serve a portion of her sentence on parole. Although several tools have been developed to improve accuracy in estimating the risk of future reoffense, few have been validated with the ever-growing population of female offenders. This study compared the utility of the Level of Service Inventory—Revised (LSI-R) in predicting recidivism for 70 female and 1,035 male offenders who had been convicted of serious violent offenses. The LSI-R predicted 1-year general recidivism quite well for women. Although gender did not moderate the utility of the LSI-R in predicting recidivism, risk factors that best predicted recidivism differed for men and women. Implications for risk assessment and parole decision making with female inmates are discussed.
Andrews, D.A. (1982). The Level of Supervision Inventory (LSI): The first follow-up. Toronto, Canada: Ministry of Correctional Services (Ontario).
2.
Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J.L. (1995). The Level of Service Inventory-Revised. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
3.
Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J.L. (2003). Level of Service Inventory-Revised: U.S. norms manual supplement. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
4.
Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J.L. (2006). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.). Newark, NJ: LexisNexis.
5.
Andrews, D.A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, S.J. (2004). The Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI). Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
6.
Andrews, D.A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, S.J. (in press). The Level of Service (LS) assessment of adults and older adolescents. In R. K. Otto & K. S. Douglas (Eds.), Handbook of risk assessment tools. New York: Routledge.
7.
Austin, J., Bloom, B., & Donahue, T. (1992). Female offenders in the community: An analysis of innovative strategies and programs. San Francisco: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
8.
Barnoski, R., & Aos, S. (2003). Washington's Offender Accountability Act: An analysis of the Department of Corrections' risk assessment. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy. Retrieved May 3, 2008, from http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/pub.asp?docid=03-12-1202
9.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
10.
Belknap, J., & Holsinger, K. (2006). The gendered nature of risk factors for delinquency . Feminist Criminology, 1(1), 48-71.
11.
Bonta, J., Law, M., & Hanson, C. (1998). The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 123-142.
12.
Bonta, J., Pang, B., & Wallace-Capretta, S. (1995). Predictors of recidivism among incarcerated female offenders. The Prison Journal, 75, 277-294.
13.
Brignell, J. (2000). Sorry, wrong number! The abuse of measurement . London: Brignell Associates.
14.
Cantor-Graae, E., & Selton, J.-P. (2005). Schizophrenia and migration: A meta-analysis and review. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 12-24.
15.
Clark, C. (2002). Addressing histories of trauma and victimization through treatment. Delmar, NY: National GAINS Center.
16.
Coleman, C., & Moynihan, J. (1996). Understanding crime data. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
17.
Coulson, G., Ilacqua, G., Nutbrown, V., Giulekas, D., & Cudjoe, F. (1996). Predictive utility of the LSI for incarcerated female offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 427-439.
18.
Covington, S., & Bloom, B. (2006). Gender-responsive treatment and services in correctional settings. In E. Leeder (Ed.), Inside and out: Women, prison, and therapy (pp. 9-34). Binghamton, NY : Hawthorne.
19.
Cutler, S., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1991). Accounting for sex differences in depression through female victimization: Childhood sexual abuse. Sex Roles, 24, 425-438.
20.
Daly, K. (1992). Women's pathways to felony court: Feminist theories of lawbreaking and problems of representation. Southern California Review of Law and Women's Studies, 2, 11-52.
21.
DeFrances, C.J. (2001). State court prosecutors in large districts, 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
22.
Deschenes, E., Owen, B., & Crow, J. (2007). Recidivism among female prisoners: Secondary analysis of the 1994 BJS recidivism data set. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
23.
Douglas, K.S., Guy, L.S., & Weir, J. (2007). HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme: Overview and annotated bibliography. Burnaby, Canada: Simon Fraser University. Retrieved August 1, 2008, from http://www.sfu.ca/psyc/faculty/hart/Guides.htm
24.
Douglas, K.S., & Skeem, J.L. (2005). Violence risk assessment: Getting specific about being dynamic. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 347-383.
25.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2005). Uniform crime reports. Washington, DC: Author.
26.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2006). Uniform crime reports. Washington, DC: Author.
27.
Folsom, J., & Atkinson, J. (2007). The generalizability of the LSI-R and the CAT to the prediction of recidivism in female offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1044-1056.
28.
Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Smith, P. (2002). Is the PCL-R really the "unparalleled" measure of offender risk? A lesson in knowledge cumulation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 397-426.
29.
Glaze, L.E., & Bonczar, T.P. (2006). Probation and parole in the United States, 2005 . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. Retrieved February 13, 2008, from http://www.ojp.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/ppus05.pdf
30.
Gray, T., Mays, G.L., & Stoher, M.K. (1995). Inmate needs and programming in exclusively women's jails. The Prison Journal, 75, 186-202.
31.
Greenfeld, L., & Snell, T. (1999). Bureau of Justice Statistics special report: Women offenders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
32.
Hare, R. (2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
33.
Harris, M. (1998). T.R.E.M. Trauma Recovery and Empowerment: A clinician's guide for working with women in groups. New York: Free Press.
34.
Heilbrun, K., Douglas, K.S., & Yasuhara, K. (in press). Violence risk assessment: Core controversies. In J. L. Skeem, K. S. Douglas , & S. O. Lilienfeld (Eds.), Psychological science in the courtroom: Controversies and consensus . New York: Guilford.
35.
Hiday, V.A., Swartz, M., & Swanson, J.W. (1998). Male-female differences in the setting and construction of violence among people with severe mental illness. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 33, 568-574.
36.
Hodgins, S., Lapalme, M., & Toupin, J. (1999). Criminal activities and substance use of patients with major affective disorders and schizophrenia: A 2-year follow-up. Journal of Affective Disorders, 55, 187-202.
37.
Hollin, C.R., & Palmer, E.J. (2006). Criminogenic need and women offenders: A critique of the literature. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 179-195.
38.
Holsinger, A.M., Lowenkamp, C.T., & Latessa, E.J. (2003). Ethnicity, gender, and the Level of Service Inventory- Revised. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 309-320.
39.
Holsinger, A.M., Lowenkamp, C.T., & Latessa, E.J. (2006). Exploring the validity of the Level of Service Inventory- Revised with NativeAmerican offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 331-337.
40.
Holtfreter, K., & Cupp, R. (2007). Gender and risk assessment: The empirical status of the LSI-R for women. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice , 23, 363-382.
41.
Holtfreter, K., Reisig, M.D., & Morash, M. (2004). Poverty, state capital, and recidivism among women offenders. Criminology and Public Policy, 3, 185-208.
42.
James, D., & Glaze, L. (2006). Mental health problems of prison and jail inmates . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
43.
Junginger, J., Claypoole, K., Laygo, R., & Crisanti, A. (2006). Effects of serious mental illness and substance use on criminal offenses. Psychiatric Services, 57, 879-882.
44.
Kirkpatrick, B. (1999). Exploratory research of female risk prediction and LSI-R. National Journal of Corrections, 24(5), 1-17.
45.
Kroner, D.G., & Mills, J.F. (2001). The accuracy of five risk appraisal instruments in predicting institutional misconduct and new convictions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 471-489.
46.
Landenberger, N., & Lipsey, M. (2005). The positive effects of cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders: A meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment . Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 451-476.
47.
Langan, P., & Levin, D. (2002). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994: Bureau of Justice Statistics special report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
48.
Laub, J., & Sampson, R. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
Lidz, C., Mulvey, E., & Gardner, W. (1993). The accuracy of predictions of violence to others . Journal of the American Medical Association, 269, 1007-1011.
50.
Little Hoover Commission. (2004). Breaking the barriers for women on parole. Sacramento: Author. Retrieved December 9, 2008, from http://www.lhc.ca.gov/lhcdir/report177.html
51.
Lowenkamp, C.T., Holsinger, A.M., & Latessa, E.J. (2001). Risk/need assessment, offender classification, and the role of childhood abuse. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 28, 543-563.
52.
Lowenkamp, C., Smith, P., Latessa, E., & Cullen, F. (in press). Can 14,737 women be wrong? A meta-analysis of the LSI-R and recidivism for female offenders. Criminology and Public Policy.
53.
Manchak, S., Skeem, J., & Douglas, K. (2008). Utility of the Revised Level of Service Inventory (LSI-R) in predicting recidivism after long-term incarceration. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 477-488.
54.
McClellan, D., Farabee, D., & Crouch, B. (1997). Early victimization, drug use and criminality . Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 455-477.
55.
Messina, N., & Grella, C. (2006). Childhood trauma and women's health outcomes in a California prison population. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 1842-1848.
56.
Messina, N., Grella, C., Burdon, W., & Prendergast, M. (2007). Childhood adverse events and current traumatic distress: A comparison of men and women drug-dependent prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1385-1401.
57.
Mihailides, S., Jude, B., & Van den Bossche, E. (2005). The LSI-R in an Australian setting: Implications for risk/needs decision-making in forensic contexts . Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 12, 207-217.
58.
Monahan, J., Steadman, H., Silver, E., Appelbaum, P., Robbins, P., Mulvey, E., et al. (2001). Rethinking risk assessment: The MacArthur study of mental disorder and violence. New York: Oxford University Press.
59.
Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
60.
Palmer, E.J., & Hollin, C.R. (2007). The Level of Service Inventory-Revised with English women prisoners: A needs and reconviction analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 971-984.
61.
Poels, V. (2007). Risk assessment of recidivism of violent and sexual female offenders. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 14, 227-250.
Raynor, P. (2007). Risk and need assessment in British probation: The contribution of LSI-R. Psychology, Crime & Law, 13, 125-138.
64.
Raynor, P., Kynch, J., Roberts, C., & Merrington, S. (2000). Risk and need assessment in probation services: An evaluation (Research Study 211). London: Home Office.
65.
Reentry Policy Council. (2005). Parole status by state. New York: Council of State Governments Justice Center . Retrieved September 8, 2006, from http://www.reentrypolicy.org/reentry/Search.aspx
66.
Robbins, P.C., Monahan, J., & Silver, E. (2003). Mental disorder, violence, and gender. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 561-571.
67.
Sabol, W.J., & Couture, H. (2008). Prison inmates at midyear 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
68.
Sabol, W.J., Minton, T.D., & Harrison, P.M. (2007). Prison and jail inmates at midyear 2006. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
69.
Simourd, D.J. (2004). Use of dynamic risk/need assessment instruments among long-term incarcerated offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 306-323.
70.
Sorbello, L., Eccleston, L., Ward, T., & Jones, R. (2002). Treatment needs of female offenders: A review . Australian Psychologist, 37, 198-205.
71.
Tolman, A., & Mullendore, K. (2003). Risk evaluations for the courts: Is service quality a function of specialization? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 225-232.
72.
Trickett, P.K., & McBride-Chang, C. (1995). The developmental impact of different forms of child abuse and neglect. Developmental Review, 15, 311-337.
73.
Valdez, A., Kaplan, C.D., & Curtis, R.L. (2007). Aggressive crime, alcohol and drug use, and concentrated poverty in 24 U.S. urban areas. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 33, 595-603.
74.
Washington State Institute for Public Policy. ( 2003). Sentences for adult felons in Washington: Identifying changes that could reduce costs without endangering public safety-interim report. Olympia, WA: Author. Retrieved September 8, 2006, from http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/rptfiles/sentinterim.pdf#search=%22determinate%20sentencing%22
75.
Webster, C.D., Douglas, K.S., Eaves, D., & Hart, S.D. (1997). HCR-20: Assessing risk for violence, Version 2 . Burnaby, Canada: Simon Fraser University.
76.
Widom, C.S. (1989). Child abuse, neglect, and adult behavior: Research design and findings on criminality, violence, and child abuse. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 59, 355-367.
77.
Widom, C.S., & Maxfield, M.G. (1996). A prospective examination of risk for violence among abused and neglected children. In C. F. Ferris & T. Grisso (Eds.), Understanding aggressive behavior in children (pp. 224-237). New York: New York Academy of Sciences .
78.
Wright, D. (2005). Receiver operating characteristics curves. In B. Everitt & D. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science (Vol. 4, pp. 1718-1721). Chichester , UK: John Wiley.
