Tolerant judgments of Muslims' political rights and dissenting beliefs and practices by ethnic Dutch adolescents (12—18 years) were examined. Participants (N = 632) made judgments of different types of behaviors and different contexts in an experimental questionnaire study. As in other studies, tolerance was found to not be a global construct. Adolescents took into account various aspects of what they were asked to tolerate and the sense in which they should be tolerant. The type of actor, the nature of the social implication of the behavior, the underlying belief type, and the dimension of tolerance, all made a difference to the tolerant judgments. Additionally, the findings strongly suggest that tolerance judgments do not develop through an age-related stage-like sequence where an intolerant attitude is followed by tolerance. For females, there were no age differences, and older males were less tolerant than younger males. There were also gender differences with males being less tolerant for some types of behavior and females being less tolerant for behaviors that negatively affected Muslim females. Level of education had a positive effect on tolerance. The findings are discussed with reference to social-cognitive domain theory.
Abrams, D., Rutland, A., & Cameron, L. (2003). The development of subjective group dynamics: Children's judgments of normative and deviant in-group and out-group individuals . Child Development, 74, 1840—1856.
2.
Altemeyer, B. (2002). Dogmatic behavior among students: Testing a new measure of dogmatism. The Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 713—721.
3.
Altemeyer, B. (2003). Why do religious fundamentalists tend to be prejudiced ? International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 13, 17—28.
4.
Avery, P.G. (1989). Adolescent political tolerance: Findings from the research and implications for educators. High School Journal , 72, 168—174.
5.
Batson, C.D., & Burris, C.T. (1994). Personal religion: Depressant or stimulant of prejudice and discrimination. In M.P. Zana & J.M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice:The Ontario symposium (Vol. 7, pp. 149—170). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6.
Bennett, M., & Sani, F. (Eds.) (2004). The Development of the social self. Hove, UK: Psychology Press .
7.
Berti, A.E. (2005). Children's understanding of politics. In M. Barrett & E. Buchanan-Barrow (Eds.), Children's understanding of society (pp. 69—104). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
8.
Bobo, L., & Licardi, F.C. (1989). Education and political tolerance. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53, 285—308.
9.
Enright, R.D., & Lapsley, D.K. (1981). Judging others who hold opposite beliefs: The development of belief-discrepancy reasoning. Child Development , 52, 1053—1063.
10.
Enright, R.D., Lapsley, D.K., Franklin, C.C., & Streuck, K. (1984). Longitudinal and cross-cultural validation of belief-discrepancy reasoning construct. Developmental Psychology , 20, 143—149.
11.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
Gregg, G.S. (2005). The middle east: A cultural psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
Helwig, C.C. (1997). The role of agent and social context in judgments of freedom of speech and religion. Child Development, 68, 484—495.
14.
Killen, M., Margie, N.G., & Sinno, S. (2006). Morality in the context of intergroup relations . In M. Killen & J. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 155—183). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15.
Killen, M., & Stangor, C. (2001). Children's social reasoning about inclusion and exclusion in gender and race peer group contexts. Child Development , 72, 174—186.
16.
Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding . Cognitive Development, 15, 209—328.
17.
Mansfield, A.F., & Clinchy, B. (2002). Toward the integration of objectivity and subjectivity: Epistemological development from 10 to 16. New Ideas in Psychology , 20, 225—262.
18.
Marques, J.M., & Paez, D. (1994). The “black sheep effect”: Social categorization, rejection of in-group deviates, and perception of group variability. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 38—68). Chichester , UK: Wiley.
19.
Parekh, B. (2000). Rethinking multiculturalism: Cultural diversity and political theory. London: Macmillan .
20.
Powlishta, K.K., Serbin, L.A., Doyle, A-B., & White, D.R. (1994). Gender, ethnicity, and body type biases: The generality of prejudice in childhood. Developmental Psychology, 30, 526—536.
21.
Robinson, J., Witenberg, R., & Sanson, A. (2001). The socialization of tolerance. In M. Augoustinos & K.J. Reynolds (Eds.), Understanding prejudice, racism and social conflict (pp. 73—88). London: Sage.
22.
Scheepers, P.M., Gijberts, M., & Hello, E. (2002). Religiosity and prejudice against ethnic minorities in Europe. Review of Religious Research, 43, 242—265.
23.
Sigelman, C.K., & Toebben, J.K. (1992). Tolerant reactions to advocates of disagreeable ideas in childhood and adolescence. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly , 38, 542—557.
24.
Smetana, J.G. (1995). Morality in context: Abstractions, ambiguities, and applications. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of Child Development (Vol. 10, pp. 83—110). London: Jessica Kingsley.
25.
Sniderman, P., Hagendoorn, L., & Prior, M. (2003). De moeizame acceptatie van Moslims in Nederland . Mens en Maatschappij, 78, 123—142.
26.
Sotelo, M.J., & Sangrador, J.L. (1997). Psychological aspects of political tolerance among adolescents. Psychological Report , 81, 1279—1288.
27.
Sullivan, J.L., & Transue, J.E. (1999). The psychological underpinnings of democracy: A selective review of research on political tolerance, interpersonal trust, and social capital. Annual Review ofPsychology, 50, 625—650.
28.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W.G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33—47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
29.
Ter Wal, J. (2004). Moslim in Nederland: Publieke Discussie Over de Islam in Nederland. The Hague: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
30.
Thalhammer, K., Wood, S., Bird, K., Avery, P.G., & Sullivan, J.L. (1994). Adolescents and political tolerance: Lip-synching to the tune of democracy. Review of Education, Pedagogy , Cultural Studies, 16, 325—347.
31.
Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge. Morality and conventionCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Turiel, E. (2002). The culture of morality. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
33.
Verkuyten, M. (2007). Religious group identification and inter-religious relations: A study among Turkish-Dutch Muslims. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations (forthcoming).
34.
Verkuyten, M., & Thijs, J. (2001). Ethnic and gender bias among Dutch and Turkish children in late childhood: The role of social context. Infant and Child Development, 10, 203—217.
35.
Verkuyten, M., & Zaremba, K. (2005). Inter-ethnic relations in a changing political context. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 375—386.
36.
Vogt, W.P. (1997). Tolerance and education: Learning to live with diversity and difference. London: Sage.
37.
Wainryb, C. (1991). Understanding differences in moral judgments: The role of informational assumptions. Child Development, 62, 840—851.
38.
Wainryb, C. (1993). The application of moral judgments to other cultures: Relativism and universality. Child Development, 64, 924—933.
39.
Wainryb, C., Shaw, L.A., Langley, M., Cottam, K., & Lewis, R. (2004). Children's thinking about diversity of belief in the early school years: Judgments of relativism, tolerance, and disagreeing persons. Child Development, 75, 687—703.
40.
Wainryb, C., Shaw, L.A., Laupa, M., & Smith, K.R. (2001). Children's, adolescents', and young adults' thinking about different types of disagreements. Developmental Psychology , 37, 373—386.
41.
Wainryb, C., Shaw, L.A., & Maianu, C. (1998). Tolerance and intolerance: Children's and adolescents' judgments of dissenting beliefs, speech, persons, and conduct. Child Development, 69, 1541—1555.
42.
Witenberg, R.T. (2002). Reflective racial tolerance and its development in children, adolescents and young adults: Age related difference and context effects. Journal of Research in Education, 12, 1—8.
