The aim of this study is to examine whether the asymmetrical pattern of communication usually found between people who use augmentative and alternative communication and their partners using natural speech was also found in the interaction between non-vocal young preschool children with cerebral palsy and their parents. Three parent—child dyads (children's age 2;5—3;4 and developmental age 18 months) were video-recorded during everyday activities. Three comparison dyads with children matched for developmental age and sex with the children in the focus dyads were studied in the same situations. There were only small differences between the two sets of children, while the parents in the focus dyads were more active than the parents in the comparison dyads. The results are discussed in relation to early intervention, aiming at enhancing development of functional patterns of interaction.
Adams, C. and Bishop, D.V.M.1989 `Conversational characteristics of children with semantic—pragmatic disorder; Part I: exchange structure, turntaking, repairs and cohesion', British Journal of Disorders of Communication24, 211—39.
2.
Bates, E.1976Language and context. Academic Press .
3.
Bateson, M.C.1975 `Mother—infant exchanges: the epigenesis of conversation interaction', Annals of the New YorkAcademy of Science263, 101—133.
4.
Calculator, S.N. and Luchko, C.1983 `Evaluating the effectiveness of a communication board programme', Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders48, 185—91.
5.
Clarke, M.T. and Kirton, A.2003 `Patterns of interaction between children with physical disabilities using augmentative and alternative communication and their peers ', Child Language Teaching and Therapy19, 135—51.
6.
Conti-Ramsden, G. and Pérez-Pereira, M.1999 `Conversational interactions between mothers and their infants who are congenitally blind, have low vision, or are sighted', Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness93, 691—703.
7.
Granlund, M.1988Talspråksalternativ, kommunikation och begåvningshandikapp [Alternatives to spoken language, communication and mental retardation]. ALA (Anpassning till Liv och Arbete [Adaptation to Life and Work]).
8.
Halliday, M.A.K.1979 `One child's protolanguage', in M. Bullowa (ed.), Before speech: the beginning of interpersonal communication, Cambridge University Press, pp. 171—291.
9.
Hansson, K., Nettelbladt, U. and Nilholm, C.2000 `Contextual influence on the language production of children with speech/language impairment', International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders35, 31—47.
10.
Hjelmquist, E.1992 `Små barns språkutveckling [Language development in small children]', in P. Hwang, P. (ed.), Barnets tidiga relationer [The child's early relationships]. Natur och Kultur, pp. 89—118.
11.
Hjelmquist, E. and Dahlgren Sandberg, A.1996 `Sounds and silence', in S. V. Tetzchner and M. H. Jensen (eds), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives. Whurr, pp. 137—52.
12.
Kaiser, A.P., Hester, P.P. and McDuffie, A.S.2001 `Supporting communication in young children with developmental disabilities', Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews7, 143—50.
13.
Light, J., Collier, B. and Parnes, P.1985a `Communicative interaction between young, nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers; part I: discourse patterns', AAC Augmentative and Alternative Communication1, 74—83.
14.
Light, J., Collier, B. and Parnes, P.1985b `Communicative interaction between young, nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers; part II: communicative function', AAC Augmentative and Alternative Communication1, 98—107.
15.
Light, J., Collier, B. and Parnes, P.1985c `Communicative interaction between young, nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers; part III: modes of communication', AAC Augmentative and Alternative Communication1, 125—33.
16.
Lindblom, B.1990 `On the communication process: speaker—listener interaction and the development of speech', AACAugmentative and Alternative Communication6, 220—30.
17.
Linell, P. and Korolija, N.1995 `On the division of communicative labour within episodes in aphasic discourse', International Journal of Psycholinguistics11, 143—65.
18.
Malinowski, B.1923 `The problem of meaning in primitive languages', in C. K. Ogden and I. A. Richards (eds.), The meaning of meaning. Keagan-Paul, pp. 451—510.
19.
Murray, L. and Trevarthen, C.1986 `The infant's role in mother—infant communications ', Journal of Child Language13, 15—29.
20.
Nicholas, J.G.2000 `Age differences in the use of informative/heuristic communicative functions in young children with and without hearing loss who are learning spoken language', Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research43, 380—94.
21.
Pennington, L. and McConachie, H.1999 `Mother—child interaction revisited: communication with non-speaking physically disabled children', International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders34, 391—416.
22.
Pennington, L. and McConachie, H.2001a `Interaction between children with cerebral palsy and their mothers: the effects of speech and intelligibility', International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders36, 371—93.
23.
Pennington, L. and McConachie, H.2001b `Prediction patterns of interaction between children with cerebral palsy and their mothers', Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology43, 83—90.
24.
Pino, O.2000 `The effect of context on mother's interactional style with Down's syndrome and typically developing children', Research in Developmental Disabilities21, 329—46.
25.
Uzgiris, I.C. and Hunt, J.1975Assessment in infancy: ordinal scales of psychological development. University of Illinois Press.
26.
von Tetzchner, S. and Hygum Jensen, M.1996 `Introduction', in S. V. Tetzchner and M. H. Jensen (eds), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives. Whurr, pp. 1—19.
27.
Vygotsky, L.S.1978Mind in society. Harvard University Press.
28.
Yoder, P.J. and Warren, S.F.1999 `Maternal responsivity mediates the relationship between prelinguistic intentional communication and later language', Journal of Early Intervention22, 126—36.
