The Debbie Smith or “Justice for All” Act was passed on November 1, 2004. The act addresses the problem of collecting and analyzing DNA evidence from backlogged rape kits sitting in crime laboratories around the country. Presently, no empirical data exist by which to assess the soundness of the legislation. However, the act clearly affects discrete operations within the forensic and criminal justice systems. This article explores the relative merits of the Debbie Smith law, highlighting changes in Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) programs, law enforcement, court administration, correctional treatment, and juvenile justice practices. Concerns linked to the likely impact of the “Justice for All” Act raise significant questions about its overall programmatic utility and treatment efficacy.
Alpert, G. P., & Smith, W. C. (2004). Developing police policy. In B. W. Hancock & P. M. Sharp (Eds.), Public policy, crime and criminal justice (3rd ed., pp. 176-189). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
American Prosecutors Research Institute. (2003). State rape statutes. Alexandria, VA: Author.
3.
Arrigo, B. A. (2006). Criminal behavior: A systems approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
Barbaree, H. E., & Marshall, W. L. (2005). The juvenile sex offender (2nd ed.) New York: Guilford.
5.
Bill Summary. (2004). Bill summary and status for the 108th congress. H.R. 1046, The Debbie Smith Act. Available at http://thomas.loc.gov or http://www.theorator.com/bills108/hr1046.html
6.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1999). Criminal victimization, 1998 (NCJ 176353). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
7.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2002). Selected findings: Rape and sexual assault, reporting to police and medical attention, 1992-2000. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office.
8.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2004). Sexual assault fact sheet. Washington, DC: National Center for Victims of Crime.
9.
Butler, J. M. (2001). Forensic DNA typing: Biology and technology behind STR markers. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
10.
Campbell,N. A., & Reiss, J. B. (2002). Biology (6th ed.) Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin Cummings/Pearson.
11.
Campbell,T. W. (2004). Assessing sex offenders: Problems andpitfalls. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
12.
Chaiken, M. R., & Chaiken, J. M. (2004). Priority prosecution of high-rate dangerous offenders. In B. W. Hancock & P. M. Sharp (Eds.), Public policy, crime and criminal justice (3rd ed., pp. 231-243). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13.
Cocca, C. E. (2004). Jailbait: The politics of statutory rape laws in the United States. Albany: State University of New York Press.
14.
Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584 (1977).
15.
Cothern, L. (2000). Juveniles and the death penalty. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice Delinquency and Prevention.
16.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2003). Uniform crime reports for the United States, 2003. Retrieved from www.fbi.gov/ucr/03cius.htm
17.
Flowers, R. B. (2000). Sex crimes, predators, perpetrators, prostitutes, and victims: An examination of sexual criminality and victimization. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
18.
Francisco, P. W. (2000). Telling: A memoir of rape ad recovery. New York: Perennial.
19.
Gelles, R. J., & Straus, M. A. (1988). Intimate violence. New York: Simon & Schuster.
20.
Graney, D. J., & Arrigo, B. A. (2002). The power serial rapist: A criminology-victimology typology of female victim selection. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
21.
Greenfeld, L. A. (1997). Sex offenses and offenders: An analysis of data on rape and sexual assault. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
22.
Greensite, G. (2003). UCSC rape prevention education. Retrieved from www.ucsc.edu/rape-prevention/index.html
23.
Gregoire, N. B. (2001). Federal probation joins the world of DNA collection. Federal Probation, 66(1), 30-32.
24.
Gregory, J., & Lees, S. (1999). Policing sexual assault. New York: Routledge.
25.
Hancock, B. W., & Sharp, P. M. (2004). Public policy, crime, and criminal justice (2nd ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26.
Hewitt, B., Podesta, J. S., & Longley, J. (2002, June 3). No time to wait. People, 57, 21-21.
27.
Hewitt, B., & Rust, C. (2003, June 3). Undone by DNA. People, 59, 19-19.
28.
Holmes, R. M., & Holmes, S. T. (2002). Profiling violent crimes: An investigative tool (3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
The Innocence Project. (2004). Web page statistics and report. Available at www.innocenceproject.org
30.
Jasanoff, S. (1995). Science at the bar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
Jeffreys, A. J., Wilson, V., & Thein, S. L. (1985). Individual-specific fingerprints of human DNA. Nature, 316, 76-79.
32.
Kilpatrick, D. G., Edmunds, C. N., & Seymour, A. L. (1992). Rape in America: A report to the nation. Arlington, VA, Charleston, SC: National Center for Victims of Crime; Medical University of South Carolina.
33.
Ledray, L. E. (1994). Recovering from rape. New York: Owl Books.
34.
Lee, H., & Tirnady, F. (2003). Blood evidence: How DNA is revolutionizing the way we solve crimes.New York: Perseus.
35.
Littel, K. (2001). Sexual assault nurse examiner programs: Improving the community response to sexual assault victims. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office for Victims of Crime.
36.
Lynch, M. (2003). God's signature: DNA profiling, the new gold standard in forensic science. Endeavour, 27(2), 93-97.
37.
Maltz, M. D. (1998). Displaying violent crime trends by using estimates from the National Crime Victimization Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
38.
Merlo, A. V., & Benekos, P. J. (2004). Dynamics of criminal justice. In B. W. Hancock & P. M. Sharp (Eds.), Public policy, crime andcriminal justice (3rded., pp. 153-175).Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
39.
Mohamadi, A. (2004). Rep. Maloney, original author of the Debbie Smith Act, thrilled that Justice For All Act and Debbie Smith finally are public law. Retrieved September 24, 2005, from http://ww/house.gov/maloney/press/108th/20041101DebbieSmithSigned.htm
40.
National Research Council. (1996). The evaluation of forensic DNA evidence. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
41.
O'Hara, C. E., & O'Hara, G. L. (2003). Fundamentals of criminal investigation. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
42.
Palermo, G. B., & Farkas, M. (2001). The dilemma of the sexual offender. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
43.
Palermo, G. B., & Kocsis, R. N. (2005). Offender profiling: An introductionto the sociopsychological analysis of violent crime. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
44.
Reiman, J. (2004). The rich get richer and the poor get prison: Ideology, class and the criminal justice system (7th ed). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
45.
Rennison, C. (2003). Criminal victimization 2001: Changes 2000-2001 with trends 1993-2001 (NCJ 194610). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
46.
Rhine, E. E. (2004). Sentencing reform and correctional policy: Some unanswered questions. In B. W. Hancock & P. M. Sharp (Eds.), Public Policy, crime and criminal justice (2nd ed., pp. 273-288). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
47.
Rich, P. (2003). Understanding, assessing, and rehabilitating juvenile sexual offenders. New York: John Wiley.
48.
Riedel, M., & Welsh, W. (2002). Criminal violence: Patterns, causes and prevention. Los Angeles: Roxbury.
49.
Roper v. Simmons, 125 S. Ct. 1183 (2005).
50.
Ross, J. I., & Richards, S. C. (2002). Convict criminology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
51.
Rudin, N., & Inman, K. (2001). An introduction to forensic DNA analysis (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
52.
Ryan, H. (2003). Ending rape kit wait puts price on justice. Retrieved from www.courtv.com/news/2003/0424/rapekit_ctv.html
53.
Salter, A. C. (2003). Predators: Pedophiles, rapists, and other sex offenders: Who they are, how they operate, and how we can protect ourselves and our children. New York: Basic Books.
54.
Scheck, B., Newfeld, P., & Dwyer, J. (2000). Actual innocence: Five days to execution and other dispatches from the wrongly convicted. New York: Doubleday.
55.
Shanahan, E. C. (1999). Stranger and non-stranger rape: One crime, one penalty. American Criminal Law Review, 36, 18-42.
56.
Shipley, S. L., & Arrigo, B. A. (2004). The female homicide offender: Serial murder and the case of Aileen Wuornos. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
57.
TalkLeft. (2004, October 7). House passes “Justice for All” DNA Act. TalkLeft: The Politics of Crime. Retrieved June 22, 2005, from http://talkleft.com/new_archives/008171.html
58.
The Third Branch. (2005,February).Justice for All Act guarantees victims'rights. The Third Branch: Newsletter of the Federal Court, 37(2). Retrieved June 22, 2005,fromwww.uscourts.gov/ttb/feb05ttb/rights/
59.
Turvey, B. E. (2002). Criminal profiling: An introduction to behavioral evidence analysis (2nd ed.) San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
60.
Walker, S. (2006). Sense and nonsense about crime and drugs: A policy guide (6th ed.) Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
61.
Willing, R. (2004, May 13). Justice department: DNA tests for guilty jam system. USA Today, p. 18a-18a.
62.
Wilson, J. J., & Howell, J. C. (1993). A comprehensive strategy for serious, violent, and chronic and chronic juvenile offenders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice Delinquency and Prevention.
