Learning strategies have been increasingly recognized as a useful tool to promote effective learning. In response to the lack of available learning strategies measures for middle school students, this study evaluated an instrument assessing cognitive, behavioral, and metacognitive strategy use among middle school students. The instrument, called the Middle School Learning Strategies (MSLS) scale, was examined in terms of factorial structure, reliability, and correlation with course grades. Results confirmed the factor structure based on cognitive, behavioral, and metacognitive strategy use. Scores on the MSLS scale and the three subscales showed satisfactory reliability coefficient (i.e., >.70). Student self-reported grades in language arts, social studies, math, and science were reasonably correlated with the three subscales. Females reported using more behavioral strategies than males. No significant difference was identified in strategy use across grades. Potential uses for the MSLS instrument in middle school educational settings are discussed.
Beaton, A.E., Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Gonzalez, E.J., Kelly, D.L., & Smith, T.A. (1996). Mathematics achievement in the middle school years. IEA's third international mathematics and science study. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
2.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
3.
Eshel, Y., & Kohavi, R. (2003). Perceived classroom control, self-regulated learning strategies, and academic achievement. Educational Psychology , 23, 249-260.
4.
Gordon, W.I., Lindner, R.W., & Harris, B.R. (1996, April). A factor analytic study of the Self-Regulated Learning Inventory. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
5.
Harrison, G., Andrews, J., & Saklofske, D. (2003). Current perspectives on cognitive and learning styles. Education Canada, 43, 44-47.
6.
Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research , 66, 99-136.
7.
Hau, K.T., & Hui, H.F. (1996, August). Theories of intelligence, achievement goals, and learning strategies of Chinese students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association , Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
8.
Hong, E., Sas, M., & Sas, J.C. (2006). Test-taking strategies of high and low mathematics achievers. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 144-155.
9.
Joreskog, K., & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
10.
Kitsantas, A. (2002). Test preparation and performance: A self-regulatory analysis. Journal of Experimental Education, 70, 101-113.
11.
Lindner, R.W., & Harris, B.R. (1991). Developing a self-regulated learning inventory: A preliminary report and analysis. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association , Chicago, IL.
12.
May, F.B. (1994). Reading as communication (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
13.
Mayer, R.E. (1998). Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem solving. Instructional Science, 26, 49-63.
14.
McCann, E.J., & Turner, J.E. (2004). Increasing student learning through volitional control. Teachers College Record, 106, 1695-1714.
15.
Mclnerney, V., Mclnerney, D.M., & Marsh, H.W. (1997). Effects of metacognitive strategy training within a cooperative group learning context on computer achievement and anxiety: An aptitude-treatment interaction study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 686-695.
16.
Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C.A. (2002). Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology , 94, 249-259.
17.
Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Beaton, A.E., Gonzalez, E.J., Kelly, D.L., & Smith, T.A. (1997). Mathematics achievement in the primary school years: IEA's third international mathematics and science study (TIMSS). Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
18.
Muthen, L.K., & Muthen, B.O. (2004). Mplus: The comprehensive modeling program for applied researchers. User's guide (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen.
19.
Newman, R.S., & Goldin, L. (1990). Children's reluctance to seek help with schoolwork . Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 82-100.
20.
Newman, R.S., & Schwager, M.T. (1995). Students help seeking during problem solving: Effects of grade, goal, and prior achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 352-376.
21.
Niemivirta, M. (1998). Individual differences in motivational and cognitive factors affecting self-regulated learning: A pattern-oriented approach. In P. Nenniger, R. S. Jager, A. Frey, & M. Wosnitza (Eds.), Advances in motivation (pp. 32-42). Landau, Germany: Verlag Empirische Padagogik.
22.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2000). Knowledge and skills for life: First results from PISA 2000. Paris: Author.
23.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2004). Learning for tomorrow's world: First results from PISA 2003. Paris: Author.
24.
Oster, L. (2001). Using the think aloud for reading instruction . The Reading Teacher, 55, 64-69.
25.
Parham, S.D. (1997). The relationships between test-taking strategies and cognitive ability test performance. Dissertation Abstracts International. The Sciences and Engineering, 57, 7260.
26.
Pintrich, P.R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego: Academic.
27.
Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W.J. (1991). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 341-356.
28.
Pokay, P., & Blumenfeld, P.C. (1990). Predicting achievement early and late in the semester: The role of motivation and use of learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 41-50.
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
31.
Weinstein, C.E. & Palmer, D.R. (2002). Learning and study strategies inventory (LASSI): User's manual (2nd ed.). Clearwater, FL: H & H Publishing.
32.
Weinstein, C.E., Schulte, A.C., & Palmer, D.R. (1987). Learning and study strategies inventory. Clearwater, EL: H & H Publishing.
33.
Williams, R.L., & Worth, S.L. (2003). Thinking skills and work habits: Contributors to course performance. Journal of General Education, 51, 201-226.
34.
Wolters, C.A. (1999). The relation between high school students, motivational regulation and their use of learning strategies, effort, and classroom performance . Learning and Individual Differences, 3, 281-299.
35.
Zimmerman, B.J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59.
36.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research and practice. New York: Springer-Verlag.
