Based on a sample of 22 oncology encounters, this article presents a discourse analysis of positive, neutral, or negative valence in the presentation of three elements of informed consent—purpose, benefits, and risks—in offers to participate in clinical trials. It is found that physicians regularly present these key elements of consent with a positive valence, perhaps blurring the distinction between clinical care and clinical research in trial offers. The authors argue that the rhetoric of trial offers constructs and reflects the complex relationships of two competing ethical frameworks—contemporary bioethics and professional medical ethics—both aimed at governing the discourse of trial offers. The authors consider the status of ethical or unethical persuasion within each framework, proposing what is called the best-option principle as the ethical principle governing trial offers within professional medical ethics.
45 CFR 46. (2005/1991). Code of federal regulations title 45 public welfare part 46 protection of human subjects. Retrieved January 19, 2009, from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm
2.
Albrecht, R., Blanchard, C., Ruckdeschel, J., Coovert, M., & Strongbow, R. (1999). Strategic physician communication and oncology clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 17, 3324-3332.
3.
Albrecht, T., Eggly, S., Gleason, M., Harper, F., Foster, T., Peterson, A., et al. (2008). Influence of clinical communication on patients' decision-making on clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 26, 2666-2673.
4.
Albrecht, T., Franks, M., & Ruckdeschel, J. (2005). Communication and informed consent. Current Opinions in Oncology, 17, 336-339.
5.
Albrecht, T., Ruckdeschel, J., Ray, F., Pethe, B., Ridddle, D., Strohm, J., et al. (2005). A portable, unobtrusive device for video recording clinical interactions. Behavioral Research Methods , 35, 165-169.
6.
American Medical Association. (1998). Clinical investigation (E-2.07). Retrieved January 19, 2009 , from AMA Code of Medical Ethics Current Opinions Web site : http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/2498.html
7.
Barton, E. (2007). Institutional and professional orders of ethics in the discourse practices of research recruitment in oncology. In R. Iedema (Ed.), The discourses of hospital communication: Tracing complexities in contemporary health care organizations (pp. 18-38). New York: Palgrave/ Macmillan .
8.
Barton, E. (2008). Further contributions from the ethical turn in composition/rhetoric: Analyzing ethics in interaction. College Composition and Communication, 59, 596-632.
9.
Barton, E. (in press). Speaking for another: Ethics-in-interaction in medical encounters. In C. Candlin & S. Sarangi (Eds.), Handbook of applied linguistics, volume 3: Communication in the professions and organisations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
10.
Beauchamp, T., & Childress, J. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
Bernick, P., Bernhardt, S., & Cuppen, G. (2008). The genre of the clinical study report in drug development. In B. Heifferon & S. Brown (Eds.), Rhetoric of healthcare: Essays toward a new disciplinary inquiry (pp. 115-132). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
12.
Blanchard, C., Labrecque, M., Ruckdeschel, J., & Blanchard, E. (1988). Information and decision-making preferences of hospitalized adult cancer patients. Social Science and Medicine , 27, 1139-1145.
13.
Blyer, W. (1997). The U.S. pediatric cancer clinical trials programmes: International implications and the way forward. European Journal of Cancer, 339, 1439-1447.
14.
Brody, H., & Miller, F. (2003). The clinician-investigator: Unavoidable but manageable tension. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 13, 329-346.
15.
Brown, R., Butow, P., Butt, D., Moore, A., & Tattersall, M. (2004). Developing ethical strategies to assist oncologists in seeking informed consent to cancer clinical trials . Social Science and Medicine, 58, 379-390.
16.
Brown, R., Butow, P., Ellis, P., Boyle, F., & Tattersall, M. (2004). Seeking informed consent to cancer clinical trials: Describing current practice. Social Science and Medicine, 58, 2445-2457.
17.
Chafe, W. (2001). The analysis of discourse flow. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 673-687). New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Charles, C., Gafni, A., & Whelen, T. (1997). Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? Social Science and Medicine, 44, 681-692.
19.
Charles, C., Gafni, A., & Whelen, T. (1999). Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: Revising the shared decision-making model. Social Science and Medicine, 46, 651-661.
20.
Davis, M., & Lang, P. (2003). Emotion. In M. Gallagher, R. Nelson, & I. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 405-439). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
21.
Degner, L., & Sloan, J. (1992). Decision making during serious illness: What role do patients really want to play? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , 45, 941-950.
22.
DelVecchio Good, M.J. (1998). American medicine: The question for competence . Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
23.
Eggly, S. (in press). Can physicians both persuade and partner? Commentary on Karnieli-Miller and Eisikouts. Social Science and Medicine .
24.
Eggly, S., Albrecht, T., Harper, F., Foster, T., Franks, M., & Ruckdeschel, J. (2008). Oncologists' recommendations of clinical trial participation to patients. Patient Education and Counseling, 70, 143-148.
25.
Heifferon, B., & Brown, S. (2008). Introduction. In B. Heifferon & S. Brown (Eds.), Rhetoric of healthcare: Essays toward a new disciplinary inquiry (pp. 1-13). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
26.
Jonson, A., Siegler, M., & Winslade, W. (2006). Clinical ethics: A practical approach to ethical decisions in clinical care (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Medical.
27.
Kasper, D., Braunweld, E. , Fauci, A., Houser, S., Longo, D. , & Jameson, J. L. (Eds.). (2005). Harrison's principles of internal medicine (16th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Medical .
28.
Kodish, E., Pentz, R., Noll, R., Ruccione, K., Buckley, J., & Lange, B. (1998). Informed consent in the children's cancer group: Results of preliminary research. Cancer, 82, 2467-2481.
29.
Language log. (2007, October). Retrieved March 10, 2009, from http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/
30.
McGrath, P., Henderson, D., & Holewa, H. (2006, July). Ethics and communication in the real world of acute medicine: Australian findings. Paper presented at the COMET (Communication, Medicine, and Ethics) Conference, Cardiff University, Wales.
31.
Miller, F., & Brody, H. (2003). A critique of clinical equipoise: Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials. Hastings Center Report, 33, 19-28.
32.
Miller, F., & Brody, H. (2007). Clinical equipoise and the incoherence of research ethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 32, 151-165.
33.
National Cancer Institute. (2004). Enhancing recruitment to early phase cancer trials: Literature review. Retrieved January 19, 2009, from http://www.cancer.gov/compendium/enhancing-recruitment-early-phase-ct-lit-review.pdf
34.
National Cancer Institute. (2007). Boosting cancer trial participation. Retrieved January 19, 2009, from http://www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/digestpage/boosting-trial-participation
35.
National Cancer Institute. (2008). What is a clinical trial? Retrieved March 8, 2009, from http://www.cancer/gov/learning/what-is-a-clinical-trial
36.
National Commission. (1979). The Belmont report. Retrieved January, 19, 2009, from www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.htm
37.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. (2008 ). Clinical trials. Retrieved January, 19, 2009 , from http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physicianguidelines.asp
38.
National Institutes of Health. (2008). Understanding clinical trials. Retrieved March 8, 2009 , from http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/info/understand
39.
Roter, D. (2000). The medical visit context of treatment decision-making and the therapeutic relationship. Health Expectations, 3, 17-25.
40.
Schiffrin, D. (2001). Discourse markers: Language, meaning, and context . In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 54-75). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
41.
Schneider, C. (1998). The practice of autonomy: Patients, doctors, and medical decisions. New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
43.
Segal, J. (2005). Health and the rhetoric of medicine. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
44.
Written communication special issue call for papers: Writing and medicine . (2008). Written Communication, 26, 210-211.
