PrintzLA. Is withholding hydration a valid comfort measure in the terminally ill?Geriatrics1988; 43 (11):84–88.
14.
BillingsJA. Comfort measures for the terminally ill: is dehydration painful?J Am Geriatr Soc1985; 11: 808–810.
15.
BergerEY. Nutrition by hypodermoclysis. J Am Geriatr Soc1984; 3: 199–203.
16.
MicetichKC, SteineckerPH, ThomasmaDC. Are intravenous fluids morally required for a dying patient?Arch Intern Med1983; 3: 975–978.
17.
SieglerM, ShiedermayerDL. Should fluid and nutritional support be withheld from terminally ill patients?Am J Hosp Care1978; 3&4: 32–35.
18.
United States, President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Deciding to forego life-sustaining treatment. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, 1983: 61
19.
CarlsonRA. The symbolic significance of giving to eat and drink. In: LynnJ. (ed.), By No Extraordinary Means: The Choice to Forego Life-Sustaining Food and Water. Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1986: 84–88.
20.
EngelhardtHT. Can ethics take pluralism seriously?Hastings Cent Rep1989; 19 (5):33–34.
21.
Nancy Beth Cruzan by her Parents and Co-Guardian, Lester L. Cruzan et ux., Petitioners v. director, Missouri Department of Health. On writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri -n. 88 - 1503 decided June 25th, 1990. U.S. Law Week 1990; 58: 4914–4941.
22.
MoriM.Bioetica: la risposta della cultura contemporanea alle questioni morali relative alla vita biologica. In: VianoC.A. (ed.), L'Etica Contemporanea. Bollati Boringhieri Ed., 1990.
23.
BayerEJ. Perspectives from catholic theology. In: LynnJ. (ed.), By No Extraordinary Means: The Choice to Forego Life-Sustaining Food and Water. Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1986: 89–98.
24.
BrockDW, LynnJ.The competent patient who decides not to take nutrition and hydration. In: LynnJ. (ed.), By No Extraordinary Means: The Choice to Forego Life-Sustaining Food and Water. Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1986: 202–215.
25.
SaundersC, BainesM.Living with Dying: The Management of Terminal Disease. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983: 1–11.
26.
TwycrossRG. Euthanasia: a physician's viewpoint. Paper based on a lecture given to the International Conference on Voluntary Euthanasia and Suicide. Oxford, 1980.
27.
Statute of the European Association for Palliative Care. Newsletter, Spring 1989; #1.
28.
Van Der SluisI.How voluntary is voluntary euthanasia?J Palliat Care1988; 4(1&2): 107–110.
29.
HuseboS.Is euthanasia a caring thing to do?J Palliat Care1988; 4(1&2): 111–114.
30.
RoyDJ. Euthanasia: Taking a stand. J Palliat Care1990; 6 (1):3–5.
31.
BoisvertM.About an “unconfirmed” stand. J Palliat Care1990; 6 (2):6–7.
32.
WilkinsonJ.The ethics of euthanasia. Palliative Medicine1990; 4: 81–86.
33.
ScottDH. Is Palliative Care a discipline?J Palliat Care1988; 4(1&2): 10–11.
34.
National Hospice Organization. Brief of amicus curiae of the NHO in support of petitioners in Cruzan v. Harmon, Director of Missouri Department of Health, . 88–1503, 1989.
35.
VentafriddaV, RipamontiC, De ConnoF, TamburiniM., CassilethB.Symptom prevalence and control during cancer patients’ last days of life. J Palliat Care1990; 6 (3):7–11.