Two factors potentially affect observers’attributions of responsibility to a rape survivor: how closely they identify with the survivor and how much they adhere to rape myths. To assess the impact of these factors, 157 female college students categorized by their sexual assault history and by their acceptance of rape myths, evaluateda sexual assault scenario. It was hypothesized that previously victimized participants would attribute less blame, and that those participants who self-identify as rape survivors would view the assault as rape more often than other participants. Neither hypothesis was supported. As expected, those who scored higher on the Rape Myths Acceptance Scale(RMAS) blamed the victim more and were less likely to believe rape had occurred. Only one subscale of the RMAS, Adversarial Sexual Beliefs, was consistently associated with participants’evaluation of the scenario, suggesting that this dimension may be especially important to understanding an observer’s assessment of rape.
Barnett, M. A., Tetreault, P. A., & Masbad, I. (1987). Empathy with a rape victim: The role of similarity of experience. Violence and Victims, 2(4), 255-262.
2.
Bell, S. T., Kuriloff, P. J., & Lottes, I. (1994). Understanding attributions of blame in stranger rape and date rape situations: An examination of gender, race, identification, and students’ social perceptions of rape victims. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 1719-1734.
3.
Bondurant, B. (2001). University women’s acknowledgment of rape: Individual, situational, and social factors. Violence Against Women, 7(3), 294-314.
4.
Bourque, L. B. (1989). Defining rape. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
5.
Breitenbecher, K. H. (2000). Sexual assault on college campuses: Is an ounce of prevention enough?Applied and Preventive Psychology, 9, 23-52.
6.
Bridges, J. S. (1991). Perceptions of date and stranger rape: A difference in sex role expectations and rape-supportive beliefs. Sex Roles, 24(5/6), 291-307.
7.
Briere, J., Malamuth, N., & Check, J. V. (1985). Sexuality and rape-supportive beliefs. International Journal of Women’s Studies, 8(4), 398-403.
8.
Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 217-230.
9.
Burt, M. R., & Albin, R. S. (1981). Rape myths, rape definitions, and probability of conviction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11(3), 212-230.
10.
Carmody, D. C., & Washington, L. M. (2001). Rape myth acceptance among college women: The impact of race and prior victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(5), 424-436.
11.
Check, J. V. P., & Malamuth, N. M. (1983). Sex role stereotyping and reactions to depictions of stranger versus acquaintancerape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 344-356.
12.
Check, J. V. P., & Malamuth, N. M. (1985). An empirical assessment of some feminist hypotheses about rape. International Journal of Women’s Studies, 8(4), 414-423.
13.
Coller, S. A., & Resick, P. A. (1987). Women’s attribution of responsibility for date rape: The influence of empathy and sex-role stereotyping. Violence and Victims, 2(2), 115-125.
14.
Cronkite, R. C. (1980). Social psychological simulations: An alternative to experiments?Social Psychology Quarterly, 43(2), 199-216.
15.
Davis, R. C., Brickman, E., & Baker, T. (1991). Supportive and unsupportive responses of others to rape victims: Effects on concurrent victim adjustment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19(3), 443-451.
16.
Dexter, H. R., Penrod, S., Linz, D., & Saunders, D. (1997). Attributing responsibility to female victims after exposure to sexually violent films. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(24), 2149-2171.
17.
Ewoldt, C. A., Monson, C. M., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2000).Attributions about rape in a continuum of dissolving marital relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15(11), 1175-1182.
18.
Frazier, P. A., & Seales, L. M. (1997). Acquaintance rape is real rape. In M. D. Schwartz (Ed.), Researching sexual violence against women: Methodological and personal perspectives (pp. 54-64). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Fulero, S. M., & Delara, C. (1976). Rape victims and attributed responsibility: A defensive attribution approach. Victimology: An International Journal, 1(4), 551-563.
20.
Gidycz, C. A., Layman, M. J., Rich, C. L., Crothers, M., Gylys, J., Matorin, A., et al. (2001). An evaluation of an acquaintance rape prevention program: Impact on attitudes, sexual aggression, and sexual victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(11), 1120-1138.
21.
Gold, A. R., Landerman, P. G., & Bullock, K. W. (1977). Reactions to victims of crime: Sympathy, defensive attribution, and the just world. Social Behavior and Personality, 5(2),295-304.
22.
Jenkins, M. J., & Dambrot, F. H. (1987). The attributions of date rape: Observer’s attitudes and sexual experiences and the dating situation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17(10), 875-895.
23.
Kahn, A. S., Jackson, J., Kully, C., Badger, K., & Halvorsen, J. (2003). Calling it rape: Differences in experiences of women who do or do not label their sexual assault as rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27(3), 233-242.
24.
Kahn, A. S., & Mathie, V. A. (2000). Understanding the unacknowledged rape victim. In C. B. Travis & J. W. White (Eds.), Sexuality, society, and feminism: Psychology of women, vol. 4 (pp. 377-403). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
25.
Kahn, A. S., Mathie, V. A., & Torgler, C. (1994). Rape scripts and rape acknowledgment. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 53-66.
26.
Kopper, B. A. (1996). Gender, gender identity, rape myths acceptance, and time of initial resistance on the perception of acquaintance rape blame and avoidability. Sex Roles, 34(1/2), 81-93.
27.
Koss, M. P. (1985). The hidden rape victim: Personality, attitudinal, and situational characteristics. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 193-212.
28.
Koss, M. P., Dinero, T. E., & Seibel, C. A. (1988). Stranger and acquaintance rape: Are there differences in the victim’s experience?Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 1-24.
29.
Koss, M. P., & Oros, C. J. (1982). Sexual experiences survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50(3), 455-457.
30.
Krahe, B. (1988). Victim and observer characteristics as determinants of responsibility attributions to victims of rape. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18(1), 50-58.
31.
Layman, M. J., Gidycz, C. A., & Lynn, S. J. (1996). Unacknowledged versus acknowledged rape victims: Situational factors and posttraumatic stress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105(1), 124-131.
32.
Lefley, H. P., Scott, C. S., Llabre, M., & Hicks, D. (1993).Cultural beliefs aboutrape and victims’ response in three ethnic groups. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 63(4), 623-632.
33.
Levine-MacCombie, J., & Koss, M. P. (1986). Acquaintance rape: Effective avoidance strategies. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 10, 311-320.
34.
Lonsway, K. A. (1996). Preventing acquaintance rape through education: What do we know?Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 229-265.
35.
Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths in review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133-164.
36.
Monson, C. M., Byrd, G. R., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (1996). To have and to hold: Perceptions of marital rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11(3), 410-424.
37.
Monson, C. M., Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., & Binderup, T. (2000). Does “no” really mean “no” after you say “yes”?Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15(11), 1156-1174.
38.
Muehlenhard, C. L., & Linton, M. A. (1987). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34(2), 186-196.
39.
Muehlenhard, C. L., & MacNaughton, J. S. (1988). Women’s beliefs about women who “lead men on”. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 7(1), 65-79.
40.
Mynatt, C. R., & Allgeier, E. R. (1990). Risk factors, self-attributions, and adjustment problems among victims of sexual coercion. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20(2), 130-153.
41.
Orlando, J. A., & Koss, M. P. (1983).The effects of sexual victimizationon sexual satisfaction: A study of the negative-association hypothesis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 92(1), 104-106.
42.
Reilly, M. E., Lott, B., Caldwell, D., & DeLuca, L. (1992). Tolerance for sexual harassment related to self-reported sexual victimization. Gender & Society, 6(1), 122-138.
43.
Shaver, K. G. (1970). Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14(2),101-113.
44.
Ullman, S. E. (1996). Social reactions, coping strategies, and self-blame attributions in adjustment to sexual assault. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 505-526.
45.
U.S. Bureau of Census. (2002). Statistical abstracts of the United States: 2002 (122nd ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
46.
Weis, K., & Borges, S. S. (1973). Victimology and rape: The case of the legitimate victim. Issues in Criminology, 8(2), 71-115.
47.
Workman, J. E., & Freeburg, E. W. (1999). An examination of date rape, victim dress, and perceiver variables within the context of attribution theory. Sex Roles, 41(3/4), 261-277.
48.
Workman, J. E., & Orr, R. L. (1996). Clothing, sex of subject, and rape myth acceptance as factors affecting attributions about an incident of acquaintance rape. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 14(4), 276-284.
49.
Wyatt, G. E. (1992). The sociocultural context of African American and White American women’s rape. Journal of Social Issues, 48(1), 77-91.
