Abstract
Rumination has been shown to be important in both the maintenance and severity of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and major depressive disorder (MDD). Increased rumination has also been linked to perceptions of increased stress, which in turn are significantly associated with increased PTSD severity. The present study sought to examine this relationship in more detail by means of a mediation analysis. Forty-nine female survivors of interpersonal violence who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed., text rev.; DSM-IV-TR) criteria for PTSD were administered the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS), the Ruminative Thought Style Questionnaire (RTS), the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and the Beck Depression Inventory–II (BDI-II). Results indicated that perceived stress mediates the relationship between rumination and PTSD, but did not do so after controlling for depression. Such results provide further evidence for the overlap between PTSD and MDD, and, in broader clinical practice, translate to a sharper focus on rumination and perceived stress as maintenance factors in both disorders.
Perceived stress is defined as “the degree to which situations in one’s life are appraised as stressful” (Cohen, Kamarck, & Mermelstein, 1983, p. 387). Perceived stress provides useful information beyond more objective measures of exposure to stressful events because it describes the individual’s interpretation of these stressors and his or her anticipated ability to negotiate such challenges. As such, research investigating the relationship between posttraumatic stress and more global perceived stress has found that increased posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom severity and higher levels of perceived stress frequently co-occur in a variety of populations (e.g., Besser, Neria, & Haynes, 2009; Frasier et al., 2004; Laganá & Schuitevoerder, 2009; Qu et al., 2012). Perceived stress has also been identified as a specific risk factor in the development (Fincham, Altes, Stein, & Seedat, 2009; Haisch & Meyers, 2004) and experience (Besser et al., 2009) of PTSD. Therefore, perceived stress may play a role in potentiating the severity of PTSD symptoms.
Rumination has also been shown to be an important maintenance factor in the manifestation and maintenance of PTSD (see Elwood, Hahn, Olatunji, & Williams, 2009, for a comprehensive review). Considered the core cognitive feature of major depressive disorder (MDD), rumination is described as the tendency to think continuously and passively about negative events and individual distress (Nolen-Hoeksema, 1991). When one considers how comorbidity rates of MDD and PTSD run as high as 48% (e.g., Kaufman & Charney, 2000; Kessler, Sonnega, Bromet, Hughes, & Nelson, 1995; King-Kallimanis, Gum, & Kohn, 2009; Nixon, Resick, & Nishith, 2004), this concurrence is suggestive of shared features, which may include the tendency to ruminate upon negative experiences. Indeed, Ehlers and Clark (2000) proposed a cognitive model of PTSD in which a continuous negative evaluation of the trauma via constant rumination and memory disruption maintains symptomatology. The same authors (Ehlers & Clark, 2008) later suggest that rumination is intended to reduce the current sense of threat and regain cognitive control. Rumination may thus serve as an avoidant strategy that ultimately maintains PTSD by allowing individuals to focus on the highly verbal yet superficial aspect of how and why the trauma happened, rather than processing the underlying emotional content (Michael, Halligan, Clark, & Ehlers, 2007).
Finally, rumination and perceived stress themselves may be interrelated constructs. Research on college undergraduates found two well-validated measures of rumination and perceived stress to be correlated at .44 (Morrison & O’Connor, 2005). This association may be best explained by a diathesis-stress model wherein increased rumination following a stressful negative life event may serve to increase subsequent experiences of psychopathology, particularly symptoms of depression (Morrison & O’Connor, 2005; Robinson & Alloy, 2003). As rumination and perceived stress appear to be important factors in the maintenance of PTSD, examining a model that addresses the relationship between these constructs within the framework of PTSD may help inform subsequent treatment of this disorder. Therefore, the present study sought to examine the relationship between rumination, perceived stress, and PTSD symptomatology within a population of female interpersonal violence survivors. Specifically, the study hypothesized that perceived stress mediates the relationship between rumination and PTSD in this particular sample, such that rumination acts to increase PTSD severity by in turn increasing the level of perceived stress.
Method
Participants and Procedure
As part of a larger neuroimaging and PTSD treatment trial, 49 women who completed measures assessing PTSD severity, level of perceived stress, and frequency of ruminative thoughts were included in the current sample. Participants were recruited via advertisements in the community and through the student subject pool of a large, Midwestern university. All participants were between the ages of 18 and 55, had experienced interpersonal violence—defined as some form of physical and/or sexual assault—as children or adults, and met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed., text rev.; DSM-IV-TR; American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2000) diagnostic criteria for PTSD according to scores on the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS; described below). Participants were excluded from the study along several criteria, including but not limited to prescription psychotropic medications; current comorbid disorders such as bipolar disorder, psychosis, or personality disorders; and traumatic brain injury.
Measures
The CAPS
PTSD severity was assessed by the CAPS, a semi-structured diagnostic interview that queries all 17 symptoms of PTSD for frequency of occurrence and severity of impairment in the past month (see Blake et al., 1990). A variety of psychometric studies conducted over the years have shown the CAPS to be internally and externally consistent (e.g., Blake et al., 1990; Hovens et al., 1994; Hyer, Summers, Boyd, Litaker, & Boudewyns, 1996). Blake and colleagues’ (1990) original scoring rules were implemented, such that each individual symptom was considered to be “present” with a frequency score of at least 1 and a severity score of at least 2. Participants were considered PTSD positive if symptom guidelines according to the DSM-IV-TR were met—that is, participants endorsed at least one reexperiencing symptom, at least three avoidance/numbing symptoms, and at least two hypervigilance symptoms.
Beck Depression Inventory–II (BDI-II)
The BDI-II is a 21-item self-report measure of a respondent’s experience of depressive symptomatology (see Beck, Steer, & Brown, 1996). Item responses fall on a Likert-type scale with ranges of 0-3, each item assessing a separate symptom of depression in accordance with diagnostic criteria in the DSM (4th ed.; DSM-IV; APA, 1994). Coefficient alpha for the BDI-II was found to be .91 in a sample of college students, with a sensitivity rate of 71% (Dozois, Dobson, & Ahnberg, 1998).
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
The PSS is a 14-item self-report measure of a respondent’s overall stress as experienced in the past month (see Cohen et al., 1983). In addition to items querying general levels of stress and nervousness, the PSS also examines the respondent’s sense of control and efficacy in his or her recent life. Item responses range from 0 = never to 4 = very often, and seven items are reverse-scored to produce a total score as a measure of overall subjective stress. Coefficient alpha for the PSS has been found to be .84 or higher, and the measure also demonstrated good test−retest reliability in two college student samples (Cohen et al., 1983).
Ruminative Thought Style Questionnaire (RTS)
The RTS is a 20-item self-report measure of a respondent’s overall tendency toward ruminative thinking (Brinker & Dozois, 2009). Participants rate items according to how well each item describes his or her pattern of thinking, where 1 = not at all and 7 = very well. Total scores range from 20 to 140, with higher scores indicating a greater tendency toward rumination. Furthermore, psychometric analyses of the RTS have concluded that the measure demonstrates good internal (coefficient α = .87) and test−retest reliability (r = .80, p < .01); the RTS is also well correlated with other measures of repetitive thought, as well as measures of psychopathology associated with rumination, such as depression (Brinker & Dozois, 2009).
Results
Participants averaged 31.4 years of age, and most identified as either Caucasian (n = 27) or African American (n = 22). Average education was 14.68 years (SD = 3.21). Participants reported an average CAPS total score of 65.02 (SD = 17.6), PSS score of 34.23 (SD = 7.82), BDI score of 25.72 (SD = 9.83), and RTS score of 97.73 (SD = 22.9). The PSS and RTS were found to be elevated when compared with the normative scores upon which the measures were standardized—23.18 and 88.00, respectively (Brinker & Dozois, 2009; Cohen et al., 1983). Internal consistency values for the CAPS (Cronbach’s α =.86), PSS (Cronbach’s α =.86), the BDI (Cronbach’s α =.88), and the RTS (Cronbach’s α =.93) in the current study all demonstrated excellent reliability.
To establish the prerequisites for mediation analysis, linear regressions were conducted among all variables to determine the significance of individual paths. Analyses indicated that the RTS significantly predicted the CAPS, β = .46, t(43) = 3.339, p = .002, and the RTS significantly predicted the PSS, β = .41, t(49) = 3.09, p = .003. Subsequent multiple regression using the RTS and PSS as predictors of CAPS scores was also significant, β = .359, t(43) = 2.563, p = .014. Thus, prerequisites for subsequent mediation analysis were met.
Sobel’s path analysis was then subsequently used to determine whether mediation was present. Analyses indicated partial mediation (t = 2.035, df = 41, p < .05), such that PSS scores appear to significantly mediate the relationship between RTS and CAPS scores in this sample. Figure 1 depicts a path diagram of the mediation analysis. The analyses were then repeated to determine whether such findings still held after controlling for depression. BDI scores were thus entered as a covariate, and the model was rerun. Results indicated that the paths between RTS and PSS scores (p = .21) and between PSS and CAPS scores (p = .47) became nonsignificant after depression was controlled. Therefore, PSS scores no longer functioned as a significant mediator between RTS and CAPS scores after controlling for depression.

Standardized regression coefficients (β) for the relationship between frequency of rumination and PTSD severity, as mediated by levels of perceived stress.
Discussion
The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship among rumination, perceived stress, and PTSD. Individual regression analyses indicated that these constructs are all closely related, confirming findings from previous research (e.g., Frasier et al., 2004; Michael et al., 2007; Morrison & O’Connor, 2005). Results of a mediational analysis initially indicated that perceived stress partially mediates the relationship between rumination and PTSD. However, these results did not hold after controlling for depression. Such results are unsurprising given the high degree of overlap between depression and PTSD, and indeed, one may extrapolate from the findings of this study that the cognitive patterns that characterize PTSD and depression may be more similar than previously assumed. Such similarities suggest treatment for PTSD may benefit from incorporating elements of depression treatment used to address rumination, especially because of the impact of rumination on perceived stress. The cognitive model for PTSD proposed by Ehlers and Clark (2000) highlights the extent to which negative trauma-related appraisal processes can negatively impact posttraumatic adaptation. This model may be applied to the findings of the current study by considering how metacognition may lead an individual to appraise increased trauma-related rumination as indicative of enduring posttraumatic dysfunction. Such an appraisal may decrease the individual’s sense of self-efficacy and control, thereby increasing levels of perceived stress. In accordance with such theory, clinicians may wish to address rumination at the outset of PTSD treatment through psychoeducation and direct intervention, such that patients may be less likely to consider themselves more stressed and less efficacious due to continuous revisiting of the traumatic memory. Mindfulness-based techniques, which encourage acceptance of current thoughts without becoming attached to their meaning, may also be especially useful for addressing rumination in this way.
Limitations of the current study include the sole use of a female sample, which may not generalize to men. Furthermore, all participants reported an interpersonal assault history. Examination of the relationship of rumination and PTSD based on other traumatic events may be warranted. In addition, participants were part of a broader PTSD treatment study, meaning they were seeking treatment at the time of participation. Therefore, the current sample may be composed of individuals who perhaps were experiencing more perceived stress due to trauma-related ruminative thoughts, and thus were motivated to seek treatment for these difficulties. This study was also underpowered (statistical power = 0.45 for a small to medium effect size; see Fritz & MacKinnon, 2007), so future research may wish to utilize larger samples to better inform the results. Finally, the data utilized in the analysis were cross-sectional. According to Maxwell and Cole (2007), mediational analyses are designed to examine longitudinal changes over time. Therefore, results from this study may only be considered preliminary. Despite these limitations, the results suggest that ruminative tendencies and level of perceived stress are important factors to consider with regard to the maintenance and treatment of PTSD symptoms. Future research may encompass an exploration of how age at trauma onset (e.g., child vs. adult) factors into such a model, especially given how the severity and consequences of rumination may increase as a function of length of time since the trauma. Future research may also wish to examine rumination and perceived stress as dimensional constructs within related forms of psychopathology, particularly MDD. Greater emphasis is being placed on the dimensional classification of disorders in the DSM (5th ed.; DSM-5; APA, 2013), and understanding interrelated aspects of psychological disorders is central to this effort. Rumination and perceived stress warrant consideration as cognitive dimensions, given their salience in MDD and PTSD. Continuous assessment of these two constructs throughout the course of PTSD treatment may thus better inform treatment approach and prognosis by providing clinicians with another index of PTSD symptom severity.
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was supported in part by National Institute of Mental Health Grants K23 MH090366-01 and 1RC1 MH089704-01.
