Although scholars contend that family and corporate heritage can be strategically deployed to gain a competitive advantage, few studies have examined the specific ways in which family firms leverage on these distinctive attributes in their marketing activities. The authors’ examination of a sample of official corporate websites reveals that family firms adopt different branding strategies to communicate the familial component of their businesses. The authors labeled these strategic variations as family preservation, family enrichment, and family subordination. This study advances extant research by exploring the various family-based branding strategies that family firms can draw on to differentiate themselves from their competitors.
AakerD. (1991). Managing brand equity: Capitalizing on the value of a brand name. New York, NY: Free Press.
2.
AakerD. (1996). Building strong brands. New York, NY: Free Press.
3.
AlbertS.WhettenD. A. (1985). Organizational identity. In CummingsL. L.StawB. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behaviour (Vol. 7, pp. 263-295). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
4.
AldrichH. E.CliffJ. E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 573-596.
5.
AndersonR. C.ReebD. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58, 1301-1328.
6.
BarthesR. (1988). The semiotic challenge. New York, NY: Hill & Wang.
7.
BerryL. (2000). Cultivating service brand equity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28, 128-137.
8.
BerryL.ParasuramanA. (1991). Marketing services: Competing through quality. New York, NY: Free Press.
9.
BlombäckA.BrunningeO. (2009). Corporate identity manifested through historical references. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 14, 404-419.
BrownS.KozinetsR. V.SherryJ. F.Jr. (2003). Teaching old brands new tricks: Retro branding and the revival of brand meaning. Journal of Marketing, 67, 19-33.
13.
CarriganM.BuckleyJ. (2008). “What’s so special about family business?” An exploratory study of UK and Irish consumer experiences of family businesses. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32, 656-666.
14.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP. (1999). Defining the family business by behaviour. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23, 19-40.
15.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP. (2003). Succession and non-succession concerns of family firms and agency relationship with nonfamily managers. Family Business Review, 16, 89-107.
16.
ColliA.Fernandez-PerezP.RoseM. B. (2003). National determinants of family firm development? Family firms in Britain, Spain, and Italy in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Enterprise & Society, 4, 28-64.
17.
CraigJ. B.DibrellC.DavisP. S. (2008). Leveraging family-based brand identity to enhance firm competitiveness and performance in family businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 46, 351-371.
18.
Da SilvaR. V.AlwiS. F. S. (2007). Online brand attributes and online corporate brand images. European Journal of Marketing, 42, 1039-1058.
19.
DavisP. S.HarvestonP. D. (1998). The influence of family on the family business succession process: A multi-generational perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22, 31-53.
20.
DavisS. M. (2000). The power of the brand. Strategy & Leadership, 28(4), 4-20.
21.
DyckB.MauwsM.StarkeF. A.MischkeG. A. (2002). Passing the baton: The importance of sequence, timing, technique, and communication in executive succession. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 143-162.
22.
DyerW. G.Jr. (2006). Examining the “family effect” on firm performance. Family Business Review, 19, 253-273.
23.
EwingM. T.FowlesD. A.ShepherdR. B. (1995). Renaissance: A case study in revitalization and strategic realignment. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 4(3), 19-26.
24.
FischerE.ReuberR. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unfamiliar: The challenges of reputation formation facing new firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31, 53-75.
25.
García-ÁlvarezE.López-SintasJ. (2001). A taxonomy of founders based on values: The root of family business heterogeneity. Family Business Review, 14, 209-230.
26.
GlynnM. A. (2008). Beyond constraints. How institutions enable identities. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SuddabyR.Sahlin-AnderssonK. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 413-430). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
27.
JohnsonM.ZinkhanG. M. (1990). Defining and measuring company image. In DunlapB. J. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference of the Academy of Marketing Science (pp. 346-350). New Orleans, LA: Academy of Marketing Science.
28.
KaplanA. (1964). The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavior science. New York, NY: Chandler.
29.
KellerK. L. (2003). Strategic brand management: Building, measuring and managing brand equity. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
30.
HabbershonT. G.WilliamsM. L. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12, 1-25.
31.
HabbershonT. G.WilliamsM. L.MacMillanI. (2003). Familiness: A unified systems theory of family business performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 451-465.
32.
HandlerW. C. (1992). The succession experience of the next generation. Family Business Review, 5, 283-307.
33.
HashimN. H.MurphyJ. (2006). Branding on the web: Evolving domain name usage among Malaysian hotels. Tourism Management, 28, 621-624.
34.
IndN. (1997). The corporate brand. London, England: Macmillan.
35.
MarkwickN.FillC. (1995). Towards a framework for managing corporate identity. European Journal of Marketing, 31, 396-409.
36.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2003). Challenge versus advantage in family business. Strategic Organization, 1, 127-134.
37.
MillerD.SteierL.Le Breton-MillerI. (2003). Lost in time: Intergenerational succession, change, and failure in family business. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 513-531.
38.
MiltonL. P. (2008). Unleashing the relationship power of family firms: Identity confirmation as a catalyst for performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 1063-1081.
39.
MorckR. K. (2005). A history of corporate governance around the world: Family business groups to professional managers. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
40.
NaughtonK.VlasicB. (1998, March23). The nostalgia boom. Business Week, pp. 58-64.
41.
OlinsW. (1989). Corporate identity: Making business strategy visible through design. London, England: Thames & Hudson.
42.
OlsonP.ZuikerV.DanesS. M.StaffordK.HeckR. K. Z.DuncanK. A. (2003). The impact of the family and the business on family business sustainability. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 639-666.
43.
OrthU. R.GreenM. T. (2009). Consumer loyalty to family versus non-family business: The roles of store image, trust and satisfaction. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16, 248-259.
44.
ParmentierM. A. (2011). When David met Victoria: Forging a strong family brand. Family Business Review, 24(3), 217-232.
45.
ParsonsT. (1956). Suggestions for a sociological approach to the theory of organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1, 63-85.
46.
PrattM. G.RockmannK. R.KaufmannJ. B. (2006). Constructing professional identity: The role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 235-262.
47.
Quinn-TrankC.WashingtonM. (2009). Maintaining the legitimacy of legitimating organizations: The institutional work of the AASCB and its constituents in business education. In LawrenceT.SuddabyR. (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 236-261). London, England: Cambridge University Press.
48.
SchmittB. H.PanY. (1994). Managing corporate and brand identities in the Asia-Pacific region. California Management Review, 36(4), 32-48.
49.
SharmaP. (2004). An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review, 17, 1-36.
50.
SimõesC.DibbS.FiskR. P. (2005). Managing corporate identity: An internal perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33, 153-168.
51.
SonnenfeldJ. A.SpenceP. L. (1989). The parting patriarch of a family firm. Family Business Review, 2, 355-375.
52.
SteierL. (2009). Familial capitalism in global institutional contexts: Implications for corporate governance and entrepreneurship in East Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26, 513-535.
53.
SundaramurthyC.KreinerG. E. (2008). Governing by managing identity boundaries: The case of family business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 415-436.
54.
TagiuriR.DavisJ. (1996). Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review, 9, 199-208.
55.
TealE. J.UptonN.SeamanS. E. (2003). Comparative analysis of strategic marketing practices of high-growth U.S. family and non-family firms. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 8, 177-195.
56.
ThompsonC. J.PollioH. R.LocanderW. B. (1994). The spoken and the unspoken: A hermeneutic approach to understanding the cultural viewpoints that underlie expressed consumer meanings. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 432-452.
57.
van RielC. B. M. (1995). Principles of corporate communication. Hemel Hempstead, England: Prentice-Hall.
58.
van RielC. B. M.BalmerJ. M. T. (1997). Corporate identity: The concept, its measurement and management. European Journal of Marketing, 31, 340-355.
59.
VillalongaB.AmitR. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value?Journal of Financial Economics, 80, 385-417.
60.
WardJ. L. (1987). Keeping the family business healthy: How to plan for continuing growth, profitability, and family leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
61.
WestheadP.HoworthC. (2007). “Types” of private family firms: An exploratory conceptual and empirical analysis. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 19, 405-431.
62.
ZinkhanG. M.GaneshJ.JajuA.HayesL. (2001). Corporate image: A conceptual framework for strategic planning. In MarshallG.GroveS. (Eds.), Enhancing knowledge development in marketing (Vol. 12, pp. 152-160). Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.
