Human service nonprofits are becoming increasingly involved with selling services and other commercial activities. There has been a debate about the advantages and disadvantages of the transition of human service nonprofits. A path model was constructed to understand factors associated with the commercialization of human service nonprofits. The model was tested using the data collected from 67 human service nonprofits. The model showed an overall statistical fit. It was found that commercial revenues were negatively associated with donative revenues. Higher levels of commercial income can significantly contribute to an organization's self-sufficiency, ability to attract and retain staff, and reputation. However, commercial revenues do not make a significant contribution to the organization's ability to attract donors and volunteers, mission, and service delivery when the effects of other variables are controlled for. Limitations of the data and methodology used for this study are discussed and suggestions for future research are provided.
Adams, C., & Perlmutter, F. (1991). Commercial venturing and the transformation of America's voluntary welfare agencies. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 20(1), 25-38.
2.
Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 78-117.
3.
Cordes, J. A., & Weisbrod, B. A. (1998). Differential taxation of nonprofits and the commercialization of nonprofit revenues. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17(2), 195-214.
4.
Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Chen, F., Paxton, P.& Kirby, J. B. (2003). Finite sampling properties of the point estimates and confidence intervals of the RMSEA. Sociological Methods & Research, 32(2), 208-252.
5.
Dees, J. G. (2004). Putting nonprofit business ventures in perspective. In S. M. Oster, C. W. Massarsky, & S. L. Beinhacker (Eds.), Generating and sustaining nonprofit earned income: A guide to successful enterprise strategies (pp. 1-18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Eilkenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk?Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132-140.
7.
Felty, D. W., & Jones, M. B. (1998). Human services at risk. Social Service Review, 72(2), 192-208.
8.
Grønbjerg, K. A. (2001). The U.S. nonprofit human service sector: A creeping revolution. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(2), 276-297.
9.
Hodge, D. R., & Gillespie, D. (2003). Phrase completions: An alternative to Likert scales. Social Work Research, 27(1), 45-55.
10.
James, E. (1998). Commercialism among nonprofits: Objectives, opportunities, and constraints. In B. A. Weisbrod (Ed.), To profit or not to profit: The commercial transformation of the nonprofit sector(pp. 271-286). New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Lynn, L. E. (2002). Humanservices and the state: The public appropriation of private charity. Social Service Review, 76(1), 58-82.
12.
Massarsky, C. W., & Beinhacker, S. (2002a). Enterprising nonprofits: Revenue generation in the nonprofit sector. Yale School of Management-The Goldman Sachs Partnership on Nonprofit Ventures. Retrieved October 5, 2003, from www.pewtrusts.com/pdf/vf_yale_business_plan_0603.pdf
13.
Massarsky, C. W., & Beinhacker, S. (2002b). Nonprofit enterprise: Right for you?Nonprofit Quarterly, 9(3), 50-55.
14.
Oster, S. M. (2004). Pricing goods and services. In S. M. Oster, C. W. Massarsky, & S. L. Beinhacker (Eds.), Generating and sustaining nonprofit earned income: A guide to successful enterprise strategies(pp. 61-76). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15.
Phills, J. A., & Chang, V. (2005). The price of the commercial success—Minnesota Public Radio: Social purpose capitalism. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 3(1), 65-72.
16.
Salamon, L. M. (1993). The marketization of welfare: Changing nonprofit and for-profit roles in the American welfare state. Social Service Review, 67(1), 16-39.
17.
Salamon, L. M. (1995). Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
18.
Salamon, L. M.(1999). America's nonprofit sector: A primer(2nd ed.). NewYork: Foundation Center.
19.
Schiff, J., & Weisbrod, B. (1993). Competition between for-profit and non-profit organizations in commercial markets. In A. Ben-Ner & B. Gui (Eds.), The nonprofit sector in the mixed economy(pp. 127-148). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
20.
Sloan, F. A. (1998). Commercialism in nonprofit hospitals. In B. A. Weisbrod (Ed.), To profit or not to profit: The commercial transformation of the nonprofit sector(pp. 151-168). New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Stone, M. M., Hager, M. A., & Griffin, J. J. (2001). Organizational characteristics and funding environments: A study of a population of UnitedWay-affiliated nonprofits. Public Administration Review, 61(3), 276-289.
22.
Titmuss, R. M.(1971). The gift relationship: Fromhuman blood to social policy. NewYork: Pantheon.
23.
Tocqueville, A. de (2000). Democracy in America(S. Kessler & S.D. Grant, Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. (Original work published 1839)
24.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS). (2002). What we do? Retrieved December 10, 2003, from www.hhs.gov/news/press/2002pres/profile.html
25.
Weisbrod, B. A. (Ed.). (1998). To profit or not to profit: The commercial transformation of the nonprofit sector. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Weisbrod, B. A. (2004). The pitfalls of profits. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 2(3), 40-47.
27.
Young, D. R. (1998). Commercialism in nonprofit social service associations: Its character, significance, and rationale. In B. A. Weisbrod (Ed.), To profit or not to profit: The commercial transformation of the nonprofit sector(pp. 195-216). New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Young, D. R., & Salamon, L. M. (2002). Commercialization, social ventures, and for-profit competition. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The state of nonprofit America(pp. 423-446). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
