Sweeping jet actuator as a fresh attempt has been applied in controlling flow separations and improving aerodynamic performances in a linear turbine cascade with tip clearance. In the present study, the oscillating jet process of sweeping jet actuator in the tip clearance was illustrated and a potential advantage from a system integration perspective was validated by an unsteady numerical study. The excitation frequencies and excitation modes were also investigated for achieving the further understanding of the mechanism of sweeping jet actuator for controlling flow separations. By using sweeping jet actuator, the flow separation near the upper endwall was delayed and the flow loss at the outlet of the cascade was reduced. For the optimal case, the time-averaged total pressure loss decreased by about 11.7% with the jet flow rate of only 0.35% of the inlet flow rate. In addition, it was found that there exists an optimum frequency to achieve the optimum controlling effects on the flow separations. Because of the blockage of tip leakage flow at the local gap by the high-momentum fluid from sweeping jet actuator, the controlling effects on the tip leakage vortex loss were better than that on the passage vortex loss. Through the use of four excitation modes in this study, the total pressure losses at the outlet were all reduced in different degrees. Under the present boundary conditions and working parameters, the unsteady controlling mode of sweeping jet actuator was found to perform much better than the other steady modes.
BoothTCDodgePRHepworthHK. Rotor-tip leakage. Part I—Basic methodology. J Eng Gas Turb Power1982; 104: 154–161.
2.
BindonJP. The measurement and formation of tip clearance loss. J Turbomach1989; 111: 257–263.
3.
Huang A. Loss mechanisms in turbine tip clearance flow. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2011.
4.
LeeSESangWLKwakHS. Tip leakage aerodynamics over stepped squealer tips in a turbine cascade. Exp Therm Fluid Sci2011; 35: 135–145.
5.
ZhouCHodsonHTibbottI, et al.Effects of winglet geometry on the aerodynamic performance of tip leakage flow in a turbine cascade. J Turbomach2013; 135: 051009–051009.
6.
ZhouC. Effects of endwall motion on thermal performance of cavity tips with different squealer width and height. Int J Heat Mass Transfer2015; 91: 1248–1258.
7.
ChenSZhouZMengQ, et al.Experiment study of the winglet-cavity tip on the aerodynamic performance in a turbine cascade. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy2017; 231: 676–685.
8.
CheonJHLeeSW. Tip leakage aerodynamics over the cavity squealer tip equipped with full coverage winglets in a turbine cascade. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2015; 56: 60–70.
9.
Zhou Z, Chen S and Wang S. Aerodynamic optimisation of a winglet-cavity tip in a high-pressure axial turbine cascade. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2018; 232: 649–663.
10.
AhnJMhetrasSHanJC. Film-cooling effectiveness on a gas turbine blade tip using pressure-sensitive paint. J Heat Transfer2005; 127: 521–530.
11.
ZhouCHodsonH. The tip leakage flow of an unshrouded high pressure turbine blade with tip cooling. J Turbomach2011; 133: 041028–041028.
12.
HuangJCorkeTCThomasFO. Plasma actuators for separation control of low-pressure turbine blades. AIAA J2006; 44: 51–57.
13.
ThomasFOCorkeTCIqbalM, et al.Optimization of dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators for active aerodynamic flow control. AIAA J2009; 47: 2169–2178.
14.
OngJMillerRJUchidaS. The effect of coolant injection on the endwall flow of a high pressure turbine. J Turbomach2012; 134: 051003–051003.
15.
GoldsteinRJChenHP. Film cooling on a gas turbine blade near the end wall. J Eng Gas Turb Power1985; 107: 117–122.
16.
GaoJZhengQZhangZ, et al.Aero-thermal performance improvements of unshrouded turbines through management of tip leakage and injection flows. Energy2014; 69: 648–660.
17.
Dobrzynski B, Saathoff H, Kosyna G, et al. Active flow control in a single-stage axial compressor using tip injection and endwall boundary layer removal. In: ASME turbo expo 2008: power for land, sea, and air, Berlin, Germany, 9–13 June 2008, paper no. GT- 2008-50214, pp.139–148. New York: ASME.
18.
BunkerRS. A review of shaped hole turbine film-cooling technology. J Heat Transfer2005; 127: 441–453.
19.
BehrTKalfasAIAbhariRS. Control of rotor tip leakage through cooling injection from the casing in a high-work. J Turbomach2008; 130: 538–544.
20.
Rao NM and Camci C. Axial turbine tip desensitization by injection from a tip trench: part 1 – effect of injection mass flow rate. In: ASME turbo expo 2004: power for land, sea, and air, Vienna, Austria, 14–17 June 2004, paper no. GT-2004-53256.
21.
Rao NM and Camci C. Axial turbine tip desensitization by injection from a tip trench: part 2őleakage flow sensitivity to injection location. In: ASME turbo expo 2004: power for land, sea, and air, Vienna, Austria, 14–17 June 2004, paper no. GT-2004-53258.
22.
Seele R, Graff E, Lin J, et al. Performance enhancement of a vertical tail model with sweeping jet actuators. In: 51th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Texas, USA, 7–10 January 2013, paper no. AIAA-2013-0411.
23.
SeeleRTewesPWoszidloR. Discrete sweeping jets as tools for improving the performance of the V-22. J Aircraft2009; 46: 2098–2106.
24.
DeSalvo M, Whalen E and Glezer A. High-lift enhancement using active flow control. In: 6th AIAA flow control conference, Louisiana, USA, 25–28 June 2012, paper no. AIAA-2012-3245.
25.
CerretelliCWuerzWGharaibahE. Unsteady separation control on wind turbine blades using fluidic oscillators. AIAA J2010; 48: 1302–1311.
26.
Tewes P, Taubert L and Wygnanski J. On the use of sweeping jets to augment the lift of a l-wing. In: 28th AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, Illinois, USA, 28 June–1 July 2010, paper no. AIAA-2010-4689.
27.
Melton LP. Active flow separation control on a NACA 0015 wing using fluidic actuators. In: AIAA paper, 2014, pp.2014–2364.
28.
Vatsa V, Koklu M and Wygnanski I. Numerical simulation of fluidic actuators for flow control applications. In: 6th AIAA flow control conference, Louisiana, USA, 25–28 June 2012, paper no. AIAA-2012-3239.
29.
Koklu M. Application of sweeping jet actuators on the NASA hump model and comparison with CFDVAL2004 Experiments. In: 47th AIAA flow control conference, Colorado, USA, 5–9 June 2017, paper no. AIAA-2017-3313.
30.
Maines BH, Ghee TA, Raghu S, et al. Comparison of flow control actuators on a diamond wing planform. In: 48th AIAA aerpspace science meeting, Florida, USA, 8–12 January 2018, paper no. AIAA-2018-0325.
31.
Meng Q, et al. Numerical investigation of a sweeping jet actuator for active flow control in a compressor cascade. In: ASME paper, Oslo, Norway, 11–15 June 2018, paper no. GT-2018 -76052.
32.
Graff E, Seele R, Lin J, et al. Sweeping jet actuators – a new design tool for high lift generation. Technical Reports NASA, Report no. NF1676L-16485, 20 May 2013.
33.
ZhouZ, et al.Experiment study of aerodynamic performance for the suction-side and pressure-side winglet-cavity tips in a turbine blade cascade. Exp Therm Fluid Sci2018; 90: 220–230.
34.
KokluMOwensLR. Comparison of sweeping jet actuators with different flow-control techniques for flow-separation control. AIAA J2017; 55: 848–860.
35.
Woszidle R, Nawroth H, Raghu S, et al. Parametric study of sweeping jet actuators for separation control. In: 5th AIAA flow control conference, Illinois, USA, 28 June–1 July 2010, paper no. AIAA-2010-4247.
36.
HecklauMWiederholdOZanderV, et al.Active separation control with pulsed jets in a critically loaded compressor cascade. AIAA J2011; 49: 1729–1739.
37.
Koklu M and Pack Melton LTG. Sweeping jet actuator in a quiescent environment. In: 43rd AIAA flow control conference, San Diego, USA, 24–27 June 2013, paper no. AIAA-2013-2477.
